Theoretical model of personal perception of human by human
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35774/pis2020.01.056Keywords:
person, personality, inner acceptance, psychic image, decision making, perception, social perceptionAbstract
The methodological study is devoted to the justification of the cyclical-action strategy and adequate intellectual means of psychological cognition of the personal acceptance of the person by the person as super-complex, substantially rooted and phenomenally numerous, developmentally and functionally dynamic meta-process of the presence in the psycho-spiritual world of the one who is self-analysing this acceptance. The first stage of the research attempt was to create a reliable theoretical platform for building an ideal structural and functional model of personal acceptance as a complete spiral of committing an individual by performing a comparative analysis, on the one hand, the stages of the development of perception as a cognitive process (in particular, categorization and cognition) events, on the other hand, the stages of acceptance as aspects of communication-exchange and at the same time as a multifunctional personal process-micro-stage of ontogeny that were studied by scientists in different recursion theoretical psychological knowledge. The unifying paradigm link and the universal tool for methodologizing this comparative analysis was the logical and structural scheme of actions made by V. Romenet’s, according to which the component cyclic unfolding of mental processes is in the cognitive work of the researcher; a psychological canon, to which tendency moves and under which phenomenology and perception and acceptance are carried out. Therefore, in addition to the regular isolation of situational, motivational, active and post-action periods and their main mechanisms of facilitation (perceptual presence, cognitive presence, thought-study penetration, reflexive absorption), in the multifaceted realization of the personal acceptance inner act, it was given a more detailed, personal and compatible with their existential existence of dominant components (recognition, characterization, interest, intentions), tweaking, deliberation, reflexion, appreciation) and subprocesses (naming, categorization, definition, cognition, comprehension, implementation, conceptualization, living). As a result, the newly created theoretical model, covering two stages – recognition and enrichment, four periods and their basic mechanisms, eight stages and their most necessary mental reconciliation and organization, characterizes the personal acceptance of a person by a person, which is a) virtually complete self-act; b) phenomenally elevates such an act to the level of the psychological canon; c) existentially counts down from the first meeting of a person with a person as a clash of their worlds, consciousnesses and destinies in the situational current of everyday life; d) dialectically unfolds as a complicated process in the framework of the ontogeny of the individual and with a tendency to change the meaning-sense format of the original life of consciousness of both contacts; e) the event ends as a reflexive absorption of the consciousness of another, fragmentarily providing optimization of personal development and cyclic-semantic enrichment of the internal conditions of functioning of the conscious ability of the human-contributor. Therefore, the unprecedented complexity of personal acceptance of such a figure is caused not only by the limited spectrum of phenomenal receptions of interpersonal contact and the presence of hidden belts and links of psycho-spiritual mediation in the general dynamics of its internal development, but also by the fact that the said process unfolds in the life of a particular agent of a social act by a double interpenetrating channel or direction – naturally ontogenetic, that is, as a value-meaning provision of personality, and at the same time unnaturally conscious, that is, as a complement and complication of the living conditions of the conscious flow of a person’s ability to be subjectively present in the world as an inspired personality and universe. Considering this complexity, which is difficult to convey by conventional psychological semantics and the author’s thesaurus and graphic modeling, at the end of the study, figurative analogies and a more metaphorical language for describing the patterns of developmental progress of the psycho-spiritual megamechanism are argued. In particular, the complete complex mechanics of three well-known devices – synthesizer, synchronizer, collider - is projected on the wistful architectonics of the cyclical-factual spiral of personal acceptance, resulting in a depiction of the work-activity of this acceptance as a subjective synthesizer, internally, and internal synthesizer.
References
Miasoid, P. A. & Shatyrko, L. O. (Eds.). (2016). Akademik V. A. Romenets: tvorchist i pratsi [Akademiс V. A. Romenets: creativity and work]. Kyiv: Lybid [in Ukrainian].
Furman, A. V. & Furman, O. I. & Shandruk, S. K. & Co (Eds.). (2019). Vitakulturna metodolohiia: antolohiia. Do 25-richchia naukovoi shkoly profesora A.V. Furmana [Viticultural methodology: an anthology. To the 25th anniversary of professor A.V. Furman’s Scientific School]. Ternopil: TNEU [in Ukrainian].
Metodologiya i psyxologiya gumanitarnogo piznannya: kol. monografiya. Do 25-richchya naukovoyi shkoly profesora A.V. Furmana (2019). Ternopil: TNEU [in Ukrainian].
Miasoid, P.A. (2011, 2013). Kurs zagalnoyi psychologii: pidruchnyk: v 2 t. Kyiv: Aletra, T1, T2 [in Ukrainian].
Miasoid, P. A. (2019). Pryntsyp istoryzmu i myslennia u psykholohii [The principle of historicism and thinking in psychology]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo – Psychology and society, 3–4, 38–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35774/pis.2019.03.038.
Miasoid, P. A. (2016). Psykholohichne piznannia: istoriia, lohika, psykholohiia [Psychological knowledge: history, logic, psychology]. Kyiv: Lybid [in Ukrainian].
Romenets, V. A. & Kyrychuk, O. V. (Eds.). (2006). Osnovy psykholohii [Principles of psychology]. Kyiv: Lybid [in Ukrainian].
Myasoid, P. A. & Furman, A. V. (Eds.). (2012). Psykholohiia vchynku: Shliakhamy tvorchosti V.A. Romentsia [Psychology act: the way of creativity, of Romenets V. A.]. Kyiv: Lybid [in Ukrainian].
Romenets, V. A. (2000). Vchynova orhanizatsiia kanonichnoi psykholohii [rganization of canonical psychology]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo – Psychology and society, 2, 25–56 [in Ukrainian].
Romenets, V. A. (2007). Іstorіya psikhologіi ХIХ – pochanku ХХ stolіttia [History of Psychology XIX – early XX century]. Kyiv: Lybіd [in Ukrainian].
Romenets, V. A. & Manokha, P. I. (2017). Istoriia psykholohii XX stolittia [History of psychology of the twentieth century]. Kyiv: Lybid [in Ukrainian].
Romenets, V. A. (1995). Postannya kanonichnoyi psychologii [The origin of canonical psychology]. Osnovy psychologii – Fundamentals of psychology. Kyrychuk, O. V. & Romenets, V. A. (Eds.). Kyiv: Lybid [in Ukrainian].
Romenets, V. A. (2013). Predmet i pryncypy istoryko-psychologichnogo doslidzhennya [Subject and principles of historical and psychological research]. Psykholohiya i suspilstvo – Psychology and society, 2, 6–27 [in Ukrainian].
Furman, A. A. (2020). Metodolohiia psykholohichnoho piznannia smyslozhyttievoi sfery osobystosti [Methodology of psychological knowledge of the sense of life sphere of personality]. Psykholohiya i suspilstvo – Psychology and society, 1, 5–34 [in Ukrainian].
Furman, A. A. (2016). Psykholohiia osobystosti: tsinnisno-oriientatsiinyi vymir [Personality psychology: value-orientation dimension]. Odesa: ONPU; Ternopil: TNEU [in Ukrainian]
Furman, A. A. (2017). Psykholohiia smylozhyttievoho rozvytku osobystosti [Psychology of the meaning-life personality development]. Ternopil: TNEU [in Ukrainian].
Furman, A.V. & Humeniuk (Furman), O.I. (2006). Psykholohiia Ia-kontseptsii [Psychology of self-concept]. Lviv: Novyi svit–2000 [in Ukrainian].
Furman, A. V. (2016). Ideia i zmist profesiinoho metolohuvannia [The idea and content of professional methodologization]. Ternopil: TNEU [in Ukrainian].
Furman, A. V. (2018). Metateoretychna mozaika zhyttia svidomosti [A meta-theoretical mosaic of the life of consciousness]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo – Psychology and society, 3–4, 13–50 [in Ukrainian].
Furman, A. V. (2018). Metateoretychni kontsepty piznannia svidomosti [Metatheoretical concepts of cognition of consciousness]. Psykholohiia osobystosti – Psychology of personality, 1 (9), 5–11 [in Ukrainian].
Furman, A. V. (2019). Metateoretychna rekonstrukciya predmetnogo polya kanonichnoiy psychologii [Metatheoretical reconstruction of the subject field of canonical psychology]. Psykholohiia osobystosti – Psychology of personality, 1 (10), 5-21 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15330/ps.10.1.5-21 [in Ukrainian].
Furman, A. V. (2019). Metodolohichna skhema vidnovlennia predmetnoho polia kanonichnoi psykholohii [Methodological scheme of restoration of the subject field of canonical psychology]. Vitakulturnyi mlyn – Viticultural mill, 21, 4–27 [in Ukrainian].
Furman, A. V. (1991). Problemni sytuatsii v navchanni [Problem situations in learning]. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Furman, A. V. (2016). Psykhodiahnostyka osobystisnoi adaptovanosti [Psychodiagnosis of personal adaptability]. Ternopil [in Ukrainian].
Furman, A. V. (2017). Svidomist yak ramkova umova piznannia i metodolohuvannia [Consciousness as a framework condition and methodologization]. Psykholohiia osobystosti – Psychology of personality, 4, 16–38. [in Ukrainian].
Furman, A. V. (1994). Psykholoho-pedahohichna teoriia navchalnykh problemnykh sytuatsii [Psychological-pedagogical theory of educational problem situations]. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Furman, A. V. (2007). Teoriia navchalnykh problemnykh sytuatsii: psykholoho-pedahohichnyi aspekt [Theory of educational problem situations: psychological and pedagogical aspect]. Ternopil: Aston [in Ukrainian].
Furman (Humeniuk), O. I. (2008). Teoriia i metodolohiia innovatsiino-psykholohichnoho klimatu zahalnoosvitnoho zakladu [Theory and methodology of innovation-psychological climate of the general educational institution]. Yalta-Ternopil: Pidruchnyky i posibnyky [in Ukrainian].
Furman, O. І. (2015). Psychologichni parametry innovacijno-psychologichnogo klimatu zagalnoosvitnogo navchalnogo zakladu [Psychological parameters of the innovation-psychological climate of a comprehensive educational institution]. Odesa [in Ukrainian].
Furman, O. I. (2003). Psykholohiia vplyvu [Psychology of influence]. Ternopil: Ekonomichna dumka [in Ukrainian].
Furman, O. I. (2018). Ia-kontseptsiia yak predmet bahatoaspektnoho teoretyzuvannia. Psykholohiya i suspilstvo – Psychology and society, 1–2, 38–67 [in Ukrainian].
Barabanschikov, V. A. (2009). Ontologicheskaya paradigma issledovaniy vospriyatiya [Ontological research paradigm]. Psihologicheskiy zhurnal – Psychological journal, Vol. 30, 5, 81–95 [in Russian].
Bodalev, A. A. (1982). Vospriyatie i ponimanie cheloveka chelovekom [Perception and understanding of man by man]. Moscow: MGU [in Russian].
Bodalev, A. A. (1985). Subektivnaya znachimost drugogo cheloveka i opredelyayuschee ego faktoryi [The subjective significance of another person and its determining factors]. Vestnik MGU. Ser. 14. Psihologiya – Bulletin of Moscow State University. Ser. 14. Psychology, 2, 13–17 [in Russian].
Bruner, D. (1975). O pertseptivnoy gotovnosti. Hrestomatiya po oschuscheniyu i vospriyatiyu [On perceptual readiness. Reader on sensation and perception]. (Gippenreyter, Y. B. & Mihalevskaya, M. B. (Eds.)). Moscow [in Russian].
Bruner, D. (1977). Psihologiya poznaniya. Za predelami neposredstvennoy informatsii [Psychology of knowledge. Outside of direct information]. (Trans. engl.). Moscow: Progress [in Russian].
Vygotskiy, L. S. (2002). Psihologiya [Psychology]. Moscow: EKSMO-Press [in Russian].
Lomov, B. F. (1984). Metodologicheskie i teoreticheskie problemyi psihologii [Methodological and theoretical problems of psychology]. (Zabrodin, Y. M. & Shorohova, E. V. (Eds.)). Moscow: Nauka [in Russian].
Obozov, N. N. (1974). Mezhlichnostnyie otnosheniya [Interpersonal relationships]. Leningrad: Izd-vo LGU [in Russian].
Rubinshteyn, S. L. (2003). Byitie i soznanie. Chelovek i mir [Being and consciousness. Human and the world]. Sankt-Peterburg, 281–426 [in Russian].
Sannikov, O. I. (2016). Psykholohiia pryiniattia zhyttievykh rishen osobystistiu [Psychology accepted life experience especially]. Odesa [in Ukrainian].
Furman, A. V. (1989). Urovni resheniya problemnih zadach uchaschimisya [Levels of solving problem problems by students]. Voprosyi psihologii – Psychology issues, 3, 43–53 [in Russian]
Hekhauzen, H. (2003). Motivatsiya i deyatelnost [Motivation and activity]. (Trans. germ.). Sankt-Peterburg: Piter [in Russian]
Bruce, V. (1988). Recognizing Faces. London: Erlbaum Assoc. [in English].
Furman, A. V. (2016). Volodymyr Rovenets as the architect of the methodology of humanitarian cognition. Psykholohiya i suspilstvo – Psychology and society, 2, 10–24 [in Ukrainian].
Furman, O. І. (2015). The innovative psychological climate: its scope, structure and parameters. Problems of Psychology in the 21 st. Century, Vol. 9, 1, 14–19 [in English].
Furman, O. (2015). Social-psychological impact a sa parametr of innovative-psychological climate. International journal of economics and society, Vol. 1, Issue 2, 143–148 [in English].
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
1. PROPOSED POLICY FOR JOURNALS THAT OFFER OPEN ACCESS
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
2. PROPOSED POLICY FOR JOURNALS THAT OFFER DELAYED OPEN ACCESS
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work [SPECIFY PERIOD OF TIME] after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
