Methodologist – profession of the future
Keywords:
professional map, professional thinking, methodological thinking, methodologist, method, professional, professional methodologyzationAbstract
The research actualize problem of professionalization methodological activity and versatily substantiates the rise in the near future profession of methodologist as one of the most prospective for the subject field of intellectual practice and at the same time as culturally and socially most necessary considering that competent production forms, methods, ways, means and instruments of thinking, activity, collective and individual think-committing of all possible direction and content, still stays either exclusive, esoteric or carried amateurishly and mostly imperfect, ineffective. It is proved that updating tendency of modern culture is methodological thinking which encompassing in removed view all other forms and types of thinking, characterized by over-subjectivity, problematization, reflexivity, discursively, universality and original practicality. At this, first condition of perfect development of such thinking is not so much in mastering by specialist fundamental knowledge and practical skills but in mastering the method as instrument of think-activity in conjunction with mastering its lengthy functional field which allows finding in the particular circumstances of everyday business optimal ways of setting and solving professional tasks and problems. It is established that the processes of professionalization and socialization methodology are stimulated not only revolutionary situation in the field of production and demonstration opportunities of new methods, forms and schemes of activity organization the cognition and intensive development of different directions (system-think-activity,rational-humanist, vita-cultural and other methodologies). A decisive role in becoming of the profession of methodologist plays multilevel, differently-modular and dynamic multicomponent system of methodologyzation as multisphere of professional activity, modular-developing organizational space of which covering principles, approaches, methods and ways as its basic forms, enabling problem-modular and at the same time reflective think-activity, that is main channel of activity perfect methodological thinking. Direction, zmistovlennya, peculiarities of course and resultant efficiency of the last depends on actualized in the discussion type of methodological module (intentional-individual, cognitive-subjective, normative-personal, value-individual, spiritual-universum), completeness of usage schematic procedures, configuration, modulation and mapping and as a result from circumstantiality of newly created products of methodologyzation – mind-schemes, models, programs, projects, methodological plan-maps of research, paradigmatic-research maps, categorical matrices. Ascertained ingenuity of concept of methodological module at research of human consciousness as existential-being givens, evidenced of what is essential specification of methodological horizon of cognition of this extremely paradoxical phenomenon. On the other hand, consciousness itself, in extended limits of unlimited freedom of reasoning and problem communication is valid subject of methodology and methodological work-activity directly related to the expansion of mind-giving horizons of consciousness for providing of which creates special intellectual means. Definitely as a result – consciousness and self-consciousness, make available the highest forms of being presence of human in the world and world in the human is a framework condition of existence and development of perfect thinking, activity, committing, methodologyzation. On these concepts and bases appears the author’s version of the cyclically-committing approach which in complementarity of logically substantiated principles, regularities and derivative rules-regulations made it possible to substantiate complete paradigm cycle of collective cognitive creativity of scientists, logical-semantic structure of deed of cognition the known representative of post-criticism in second half of the XX century and also full game-committing as onto-phenomenal givens. Besides, at the end of the research making a start from requirements of the principle quaternary, formulated rules of collective thinking, professional roles and main principles of think activity of methodologist. In particular, argumented that its minimal role set should be simultaneous competent activity as a philosopher, epistemologist, analyst and practitioner on organization, guidance and management and to provide professional harmonization of the world of methodology and sphere of methodologyzation need to achieve availability of four system characteristics: always renewable fundamental methodological knowledge, presence of methodologist’s person, capable to pure thought, schematization, problem-dialogue consciousness and appropriate lifestyle; activity of group and organizations, able to effectively implement philosophical and applied methodologyzation; systematic responsible methodological self-practicing those who calls themselves methodologist in the bosom of methodological Kastalia.
References
Ball G.O. Systjema pryncypіv racіogumanіzmu / Georgіj Olexіjovych Ball // Psyhologіja і suspіl’stvo. – 2011. – №4. – S. 16–33.
Volkov V.Е. Obrazovatjel’naja programma sjeti mjetodologichjeskih laboratorij / V.Е. Volkov // Voprosy mjetodologii. – 1994. – №3-4. – S. 140–141.
Gjeorgij Pjetrovich Schjedrovickij / G.P. Schjedrovickij; [pod rjed. P.G. Schjedrovickogo, V.L. Danilovoj]. – M.: Ross. polit. enc-ja (ROSSPEN), 2010. – 600 s. – (Filosofija Rossii vtoroj poloviny HH v.).
Gromyko Ju.V. Moskovskaja mjetodologichjeskaja shkola: sociokul’turnyje uslovija vozniknovjenija, idjejnoje sodjerzhanije, probljemy razvitija / Jurij Gromyko // Voprosy mjetodologii. – 1991. – №4. – S. 21–39.
Gumenjuk (Furman) O.Y. Psyhologіja vplyvu: [monografіja] / Oxana Yevstahіyіvna Gumenjuk (Furman). – Ternopіl’: Еkonomіchna dumka, 2003. – 304 s.
Gusjel’cjeva M. Kul’turno-іstorechnij pіdhіd V.A. Romjencja: іdjeja kul’tury ta іdjeyі v kul’turі / Marina Gusjel’cjeva // Psyhologіja і suspіl’stvo. – 2011. – №2. – S. 92–104.
Zinchjenko A.P. “Izgotovljenije mysli” po G.P. Schjedrovickomu / Aljexandr Prokop’jevich Zinchjenko // Voprosy mjetodologii. – 1996. – №1-2. – S. 123–127.
Zinchjenko A.P. K programmje rabot po tjemje “Shjemy i mjehanizmy shjematizacii v mysljedjejatjel”nosti” / Aljexandr Prokop’jevich Zinchjenko // Kjentavr. – 1994. – №1. – S. 3–8.
Zinchjenko A.P. Programma stroitjel’stva sovrjemjennoj sistjemy obrazovanija / Aljexandr Prokop’jevich Zinchjenko // Voprosy mjetodologii. – 1994. – №3–4. – S. 141–145.
Kopilov G. Pro prirodu “naukovih rjevoljucіj” / Gjennadіj Kopilov // Psihologіja і suspіl’stvo. – 2010. – №2. – S. 113–127.
Kopylov G. Mjetodologija i mjetodologizacija v kontjextje vrjemjeni / Gjennadij Kopylov // Kjentavr. – 1992. – № 1. – Vyp. 5. – S. 6–11.
Krajchinskaja S.B. Lokal’naja obrazovatjel’naja sistjema. Shtrihi k projektu / S.B. Krajchinskaja // Voprosy mjetodologii. – 1994 – №3–4. – S. 151–153.
Lakatos I. Fal’sifikacija i mjetodologija nauchno-issljedovatjel’skih programm / Imrje Lakatos. – M.: Mjedium, 1995. – 184 s.
Laponov M. Fіlosofіja jak nauka. Osnovi fіlosofs’koyі mjetodologіyі / Mikola Laponov, Vadym Komіssarov // Systjema suchasnih mjetodologіj: [hrjestomatіja u 4-h tomah] / uporjad., vіdp. rjed., pjerjekl. A.V. Furman. – Ternopіl’: TNЕU, 2015. – T.1. – S. 200–222.
Lukovjenko J.V. Disciplina uma / Jurij Viljenovich Lukovjenko // Voprosy mjetodologii. – 1994. – №3–4. – S. 156–158.
M’jasoyіd P. Mjetatjeorjetichnij analіz u psihologіyі / Pjetro M’jasoyіd // Psihologіja і suspіl’stvo. – 2009. – №4. – S. 54–82.
Mamardashvili M. Lekcii po antichnoj filosofii / Mjerab Mamardashvili. – SPb.: Azbuka, Azbuka-Attikus, 2014. – 256 s. – (Azbuka-klassika. Non-Fiction).
Mamardashvili M.K. Kak ja ponimaju filosofiju / Mjerab Konstantinovich Mamardashvili. – [2-je uzd., izmjen. i dop.] / sost. i obsch. rjed. Ju.P. Sjenokosova. – M. : Izd. gruppa “Progrjess”, “Kul”tura”, 1992. – 416 s.
Maracha V. Vstrjecha mjetodologa i samosoznanija / Vjachjeslav Maracha // Kjentavr. – 1991. – № 2. – Vyp. 4. – S. 25–37.
Maracha V. Struktura i razvitije nauki s tochki zrjenija mjetodologichjeskogo institucionalizma / Vjachjeslav Maracha // Kjentavr. – 2004. – №33. – S. 45–63.
Mackjevich V.V. Podhod / Vladimir Mackjevich // Vsjemirnaja enciklopjedija: Filosofija; gl. nauch. rjed. i sost. A.A. Gricanov. – M.: AST, Mn.: Harvjest, Sovr. lit-tor, 2001. – S. 794–795.
Mjejtuv P. Shjematizacija v mjetodologichjeskoj rabotje / P. Mjejtuv, V. Butorin // Kjentavr. – 1994. – №1. – S. 9–17.
Nikitin V.A. Idjeja obrazovanija ili sodjerzhanije obrazovatjel’noj politiki / Vladimir Afrikanovich Nikitin. – K.: Optima, 2004. – 205 s.
Nietzsche F. Volja k vlasti: opyt pjerjeocjenki vsjeh cjennostjej / Friedrich Nietzsche. – M.: Rjefl-Buk, 1994. – 352 s.
Popper K.R. Nischjeta istoricizma / Karl R. Popper; pjer. s angl. – M.: Izd. gruppa “Progrjess-VIA”, 1993. – 187 s.
Psyhologіja vchynku: Shljahamy tvorchostі V.A. Romjencja: zb. st. / uporjad. P.A. M’jasoyіd; vіdp. rjed. A.V. Furman. – K.: Lybіd’, 2012. – 296 s.
Psyhologіja і suspіl’stvo: Spjecvipusk, prisvjachjenij 85-j rіchnicі z dnja narodzhjennja Volodimira Andrіjovicha Romjencja. – 2011. – №2. – 190 s.
Rak M. Mjesto normirovanija i jego stratjegija v procjessah razvitija / M. Rak // Kjentavr. – 2005. – №35. – S. 7–13.
Romjenjec’ V.A. Іstorіja psyhologіyі XX stolіttja: [navch. posіb.] / V.A. Romjenjec’, І.P. Manoha. – K.: Lybіd’, 1998. – 992 s.
Romjenjec’ V.A. Prjedmjet і princypy іstoriko-psihologіchnogo doslіdzhjennja / Volodymyr Romjenjec’ // Psyhologіja і suspіl’stvo. – 2013. – №2. – S. 6–27.
Romjenjec’ V.A. Psyhologіja tvorchostі: [navch. posіbnyk] / Volodymyr Romjenjec’. – [2-gje vid., dop.]. – K.: Libіd’, 2001. – 288 s.
Romjenjec’ V.A. Іstorіja psyhologіyі : XІX – pochatok XX stolіttja : [navch. posіb.] / V.A. Romjenjec’. – K.: Lybіd’, 2006. – 832 s.
Saakov V.V. Epistjemologichjeskaja probljematika v razrabotkje sistjemy mjetodologichjeskih laboratorij / V.V. Saakov // Voprosy mjetodologii. – 1994. – №3–4. – S. 158–159.
Systjema suchasnyh mjetodologіj: [hrjestomatіja u 4-h tomah] / uporjad., vіdp. rjed., pjerjekl. A.V. Fuman. – Ternopіl’: TNЕU, 2015. – T. 1. – 314 s.; T. 2. – 344 s.; T. 3. – 400 s.; T. 4. – 388 s.
Stjopin V.S. Gjenjezis social’no-gumanitarnyh nauk (filosofskij i mjetodologichjeskij aspjekty) / Vjachjeslav Sjemjonovich Stjopin // Voprosy filosofii. – 2004. – №3. – S. 37–43.
Stjopin V.S. Osnovanija nauki i ih sociokul’turnaja razmjernost’ / Vjachjeslav Sjemjonovich Stjopin. – M., 1996. – Rjezhim dostupa k stat’je: http://philosophy.ru/iphras/library/ruspaper/STIOPIN1.htm
Stjopin V.S. Stanovljenije nauchnoj tjeorii: [monografija] / Vjachjeslav Sjemjonovich Stjopin. – Minsk: Izd-vo BGU,1976. – 319 s.
Stjopin V.S. Tjeorjetichjeskoje znanije : struktura, istorichjeskaja evoljucija : [monografija] / Vjachjeslav Sjemjonovich Stjopin. – M. : Progrjess-Tradicija, 2000. – 744 s.
Furman A.V. Volodymyr Romjenjec’ jak mjetodolog psyhosofіjnogo duhu / Anatolіj V. Furman // Psyhologіja і suspіl’stvo. – 2011. – №2. – S. 7–14.
Furman A.V. Gjenjeza nauky jak global’na doslіdnic’ka programa: ciklіchno-vchinkova pjerspjektiva / Anatolіj V. Furman // Psyhologіja і suspіl’stvo. – 2013. – №4. – S. 18–36.
Furman A.V. Іdjeja і zmіst profjesіjnogo mjetodologuvannja: [monografіja] / Anatolіj Vasyl’ovich Furman. – Tjernopіl’: TNЕU, 2015. – 362 s.
Furman A.V. Іdjeja profjesіjnogo mjetodologuvannja: [monografіja] / Anatolіj Vasyl’ovich Furman. – Yalta-Tjernopіl’: Еkonomіchna dumka, 2008. – 205 s.
Furman A.V. Katjegorіyі vіtakul’turnoyі mjetodologіyі jak jefjektivnij zasіb analіzu і rozv’jazannja skladnih probljem / Anatolіj V. Furman // Іnstytut expjerimjental’nyh systjem osvіty: Іnform. bjuljetjen’. – Vip. 4. – Tjernopіl’, 2004. – S. 4–7.
Furman A.V. Mjetodologіchnje obgruntuvannja bagatorіvnjevostі paradygmal’nih doslіdzhjen’ u socіal’nіj psyhologіyі / Anatolіj V. Furman // Psyhologіja і suspіl’stvo. – 2012. – №4. – S. 78–125.
Furman A.V. Mjetodologіja paradigmal’nih doslіdzhjen’ u socіal’nіj psyhologіyі: [monografіja] / Anatolіj Vasyl’ovich Furman. – K.: Іnstytut polіtichnoyі і socіal’noyі psyhologіyі; Ternopіl’: Еkonomіchna dumka, 2013. – 100 s.
Furman A.V. Paradygma jak prjedmjet mjetodologіchnoyі rjefljexіyі / Anatolіj V. Furman // Psyhologіja і suspіl’stvo. – 2013. – №3. – S. 72–85.
Furman A.V. Svіdomіst’ jak ramkova umova mjetodologuvannja u socіogumanіtaristicі / Anatolіj V. Furman // Psyhologіchnі zasadi rozvitku, psyhodіagnostiki ta korjekcіyі osobystostі v sistjemі njepjerjervnoyі osvіti / za nauk. rjed. Tomchuka M.І. // Zb. mat. Podіl’s’koyі n.-pr. konf. – Vіnnicja: KVNZ “Vіnnic’ka akadjemіja njepjerjervnoyі osvіti”, 2016. – S. 147–156.
Furman A.V. Tjeorjetichna modjel’ gri jak uchinjennja / Anatolіj V. Furman // Nauka і osvіta. – 2014. – №5/CXXІ. – S. 95–104.
Furman A.V., Shandruk S.K. Oganіzacіjno-dіjal’nіsnі іgry u vyschіj shkolі: [monografіja] / Anatolіj V. Furman, Sergіj Shandruk. – Ternopіl’: TNЕU, 2014. – 272 s.
Furman A.V., Shandruk S.K. Sutnіst’ gry jak uchinok: [monografіja] / Anatolіj V. Furman, Sergіj Shandruk. – Ternopіl’: TNЕU, 2014. – 120 s.
Schjedrovickij G. P. Izbrannyje trudy / Gjeogrij Pjetrovich Schjedrovickij ; [rjed.-sost. A. A. Piskoppjel’, L. P. Schjedrovickij]. – M. : Shk. kul’t. politiki, 1995. – 760 s.
Schjedrovic’kij G.P. Mjetodologіchnje znachjennja opozicіyі naturalіstichnogo і sistjemodіjal’nіsnogo pіdhodіv / Gjeorgіj Schjedrovic’kij // Psihologіja і suspіl’stvo. – 2013. – №1. – S. 40–47.
Schjedrovickij G.P. Moskovskij mjetodologichjeskij kruzhok: razvitije idjej i podhodov / Iz arhiva G.P. Schjedrovickogo. – T.8, vyp. 1. – M.: Put’, 2004. – 352 s.
Schjedrovickij G.P. Organizacionno-djejatjel’nostnaja igra: Sbornik tjextov (2). Iz arhiva G.P. Schjedovickogo. – T.9. – M.: Nasljedije MMK, 2004. – 320s.
Schjedrovic’kij G. Rozumіnnja ta іntjerprjetacіyі shjemi znannja / Gjeorgіj Schjedrovic’kij // Psihologіja і suspіl’stvo. – 2001. – №4. – S. 8–15.
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
1. PROPOSED POLICY FOR JOURNALS THAT OFFER OPEN ACCESS
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
2. PROPOSED POLICY FOR JOURNALS THAT OFFER DELAYED OPEN ACCESS
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work [SPECIFY PERIOD OF TIME] after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
