Everydayness of spirituality in optics of methodological analysis

Authors

  • Jaroslava Buherko Candidate of Psychological Sciences, associate professor, assistant professor of psychology and social work of Ternopil National Economic University, doctoral student of the Department of Psychology and Pedagogy of the National Pedagogical University named after MP Drahomanov, Kyiv

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35774/pis2017.01.062

Keywords:

spirituality, objective reality, subjective reality, transcendence, spiritual reality, spiritual being, spiritual culture, spiritual practice of the human, vita-cultural methodology

Abstract

The article deals with spirituality as immanent-transcendent essence of the human when the unity of the objective (external) world and internal light of human soul is the foundation of its existence-being in the integrity and perfection, the core of self-awareness by it its own deep I. Relying on the vita-cultural methodology of A. V. Furman and his scientific school, is shown that the depth of disclosure the phenomenon of spirituality depends on several factors, determining among which are personality of the researcher, perfect mastering by him the methodology of scientific cognition and his ability to samisno actualized spiritual practicing. Created categorical matrix of psycho-spiritual  world of human which allows  to achieve  a categorical manner by implementing two methodological procedures: binary involvement of coordinate axis with dialectical categories “general – special – single – specific – universal” and determining of the center line of theorizing in a wide “cross-diagonal” range of its realization “spiritual reality – the spiritual maturity” and “Spirit – transpersonal boundary value-meanings”.

References

Buherko Ya. Fenomen dukhovnosti u konteksti filosofsko-psykholohichnykh doslidzhen . Pedagogy and Psychology. 2015. III (27). Issue 51. R. 69–74 [In Ukrainian].

Humeniuk (Furman) O. Dukhovno-universumne samotvorennia. tsentralna lanka psykholohichnoho vplyvu . Oksana Humeniuk (Furman) . Psykholohiia i suspilstvo. 2003. № 4. S. 10–28 [In Ukrainian].

Humeniuk (Furman) O. Ye. Spontanno-dukhovna orhanizatsiia Ya-kontseptsii universuma . Oksana Yevstakhiivna Humeniuk (Furman). Ternopil : Ekonomichna dumka, 2003. 40 s. [In Ukrainian].

Kubaievskyi M., Furman A.V. Metodolohuvannia yak zasib rozuminnia smyslu . Mykola Kubaievskyi, Anatolii V. Furman . Psykholohiia i suspilstvo. 2010. № 4. S. 47–57 [In Ukrainian].

Onyshchenko V. D. Filosofiia dukha i dukhovnoho piznannia : Khrystyiansko-filosofska noolohiia . V. D. Onyshchenko. Lviv : Lohos, 1998. 338 s. [In Ukrainian].

Osypov A. O. Ontolohiia dukhovnosti : [monohrafiia : u 2-kh knyhakh] . Anatolii Oleksandrovych Osypov. Mykolaiv : Vyd-vo MDHU im. Petra Mohyly, 2008. Kn. 1. 240 s. [In Ukrainian].

Revasevych I. Problema vyokremlennia ta intehruvannia form zhyttiezdiisnennia liudyny u sviti . Iryna Revasevych . Psykholohiia i suspilstvo. 2015. № 3. S.105–114 [In Ukrainian].

Tatenko V. O. Subiektno-vchynkova paradyhma v suchasnii psykholohii . V. O. Tatenko . Liudyna. Subiekt. Vchynok : Filosofsko-psykholohichni studii . [za zah. red. V. O. Tatenka]. K.: Lybid, 2006. S. 316–358 [In Ukrainian].

Tokarjeva S. B. Probljema duhovnogo opyta i metodologichjeskije osnovanija analiza duhovnosti . Svjetlana Borisovna Tokarjeva. Volgograd: Izd-vo VolGU, 2003. 256 s. [In Russian].

Frank S. L. Rjeal’nost’ i chjelovjek. Mjetafizika chjelovjechjeskogo bytija [Еljektronnij rjesurs] : S. L. Frank. Rjezhim dostupu : http:. www.magister.msk.ru. library. philos. frank. frank006.htm [In Russian].

Furman A. V. Geneza nauky yak hlobalna doslidnytska prohrama: tsyklichno-vchynkova perspektyva . Anatolii V. Furman . Psykholohiia i suspilstvo. 2013. № 4. S.18–36 [In Ukrainian].

Furman A. V. Ideia i zmist profesiinoho metodolohuvannia: [monohrafiia] . Anatolii Vasylovych Furman. Ternopil: TNEU, 2016. 378 s. [In Ukrainian].

Furman A. V. Katehorii vitakulturnoi metodolohii yak efektyvnyi zasib analizu i rozviazannia skladnykh problem . Anatolii V. Furman . Instytut eksperymentalnykh system osvity (naukovo-doslidnyi) : Informatsiinyi biuleten. Vyp. 4. Ternopil : Ekonomichna dumka, 2004. S. 4–7 [In Ukrainian].

Furman A. V. Paradyhma yak predmet metodolohichnoho analizu . Anatolii V. Furman . Psykholohiia i suspilstvo. 2013. № 3. S. 72–85 [In Ukrainian].

Furman A. V. Psykhokultura ukrainskoi mentalnosti : 2-e naukove vydannia . Anatolii Vasylovych Furman. Ternopil: NDI MEVO, 2011. 168 s. [In Ukrainian].

Yunh K. H. Arkhetypy i kolektyvne nesvidome . Karl Hustav Yunh. Lviv : Vydavnytstvo “Astroliabiia”, 2013. 588 s. [In Ukrainian].

Buherko J. The analyze of the spirituality scientific approaches studying . J. Buherko . International Journal of Economics and Society. 2015. June, Volum 1, Issue 2. P. 160–169. [In English].

Buherko J. Philosophical approaches to the study of the spiritual human being: naturalistic interpretation of spirituality . J. Buherko . Психологія і суспільство. 2016. № 3. С.46–52 [In English].

Downloads

Issue

No. 1 (2017): Psychology & society

Section

Статті

License

1. PROPOSED POLICY FOR JOURNALS THAT OFFER OPEN ACCESS


Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

    1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

    1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).



2. PROPOSED POLICY FOR JOURNALS THAT OFFER DELAYED OPEN ACCESS


Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work [SPECIFY PERIOD OF TIME] after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

    1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

How to Cite

Buherko, Jaroslava. “Everydayness of Spirituality in Optics of Methodological Analysis”. Psyhology & Society, no. 1, Mar. 2019, pp. 62-72, https://doi.org/10.35774/pis2017.01.062.