Self-concept as the subject of multi-aspect theorizing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35774/pis2018.01.038Keywords:
consciousness, self-consciousness, identification, personality, Self-concept, Self-image, Self-attitude, Self-deed, Self-spiritual, positive-harmonious Self-concept, global Self-conceptAbstract
The article substantiates self-concept as a systemic ontogenetic formation of the human’s inner world, which is unique in its functions, purpose and self-organizing actualization, since it forms a number of important thoughts, ideas, attitudes, knowledge, experiences, feelings, dreams, disappointments and installations about oneself; it develops in the family, and later in the school environment, is improved in business and industrial (professional) relations, progresses or degrades in everyday relationships throughout the life course, is the center of its social world, as it combines a person with the environment. The interrelation of the theoretical comprehension of the self-concept as the central core of self-consciousness is highlighted through four aspects: substantiation, development, formation and self-creation in complementarity with methodological approaches that interpret it as epistemologically-epistemic reality, ontogenetic reality, ontological-phenomenological givens and a noumenal-axiological organization. The psychological organization of the inner world of human from the Self-concept to the We-concepts is analysed in details, where the last one is not the sum of individual persons of the first one, but is a qualitatively new integral wholeness of representations, attitudes, installations and other mental entities about the collective consciousness of individual groups or group, which in most cases belongs, for example, to national consciousness. At the same time, there is a distinction between the three-component structure of the global Self-concept of R. Burns, which encompasses the following components: cognitive (Self-image), emotional-evaluative (Self-attitude), behavioral (Self-behavior), and author’s four-component structure of positively harmonic Self-concept (created in 2001, supplemented in 2003-2006, detailed in 2007-2018), which holds cognitive (Self-image), emotional-evaluative (Self-attitude), action-creative (Self-act), spontaneously-spiritual (Self-spiritual). In addition, dimensions of interpenetration of consciousness, self-consciousness and self-concept are described, which are mutually-caused and constitute indivisible unity, and also the author’s model of self-creation of a positively harmonious Self-concept in the structure of an innovative-psychological climate is substantiated, which is not identical to a socio-psychological or organizational one, but available in the modular-developing training system of prof. A. V. Furman, who specifies the coordinates of self-creation, depending on the ones he has singled out: 1) the periods of the modular-developing cycle (information-cognitive, normative-regulatory, value-aesthetic, spiritual), which extend and enrich the socio-cultural experience of the nation and humanity, not only with knowledge, skills, abilities, but also norms, competencies, values and development of spirituality, 2) the sequence of psycho-artistic technologies of developmental interaction in the classroom (problem-situational – the acquisition of knowledge by the subject, regulatory – the rationing of knowledge and skills by the personality, value-aesthetic - the spread of the acquired cultural experience and competences by the individuality, spontaneously-spiritual – self-realization of the person as a universe). It is proved that the idea of self-formation is substantiated by us from the model of free causing of V. A. Pertrovskiy, who develops the concept of Self as causa sui through the comprehension of the four facets (ideal Self-image, immanent Self-intention, tranfinite Self-experience, transcendental Self-thought), each of which implements in itself one of the known Aristotelian causes and can simultaneously be attributed to the rank “cause of yourself”. Namely this model is a peculiar starting point for the theoretical analysis of the self-creation problem of Self-concept, since the recognition of self-assertion in psychology makes it possible to confirm the authenticity of not only the ideas of self-movement and self-development of the personality, when development takes place in the internal space of its connections with other people, but also in the active dynamics of the psychological mechanism course of self-creation of Self through an internal meeting in the sphere of self-consciousness of vita-cultural forms of activity (behavior, activity, deed, communication) and “images of the subjective reality” (human as an individual, a subject, a personality, a universum, according to the concept of V. I. Slobodchikov, E. I. Isaev).
References
Arsenev A. S. Razmyshlenyia o rabote S. L. Rubynshteina Chelovek i myr. Anatolyi Serheevych Arsenev. Voprosy fylosofyy. 1993. № 5. S. 130-160.
Berns R. Razvytye Ya-kontseptsyi i vospytanye. Robert Berns; per. s anhl. M. : Prohress, 1986. 421 s.
Bobrov E.O. O samosoznanyy. E.O. Bobrov. Kazan, 1898. 192 s.
Boryshevskyi M. Samosvidomist yak faktor psykhichnoho rozvytku osobystosti. Myroslav Boryshevskyi. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo. 2009. №4. S. 128-135.
Bouen M. Dukhovnost y lychnostno-tsentryrovannyi podkhod. Maryia Bouen. Voprosy psykholohyy. 1992. № 3-4. S. 29-35.
Vachkov Y.V. Skazkoterapyia: Razvytye samosoznanyia posredstvom psykholohycheskoi skazky. 2-e yzd., pererab. y dop. M.: Os-89, 2003. 144 s.
Vyhotskyi L.S. Psikholohyia. Lev Semenovych Vyhotskyi. M.: Yzd-vo EKSMO-Press, 2002. 1008 s. (Seryia Mir psykholohyy).
Hehel H.V.F. Entsyklopedyia fylosofskykh nauk. Heorh Vylhelm Frydrykh Hehel. T.3. Fylosofyia dukha. Otv. red. E.P. Sytkovskyi; red. kollehyia: B.M. Kedrov y dr. M.: Mysl, 1977. 471 s. (AN SSSR. In-t fylosofyy. Fylos. nasledye).
Hirniak A.N. Ideia nesvidomoho i psykhoanaliz Z. Froida. A.N. Hirniak. Lektsiia. Yalta: Redaktsiino-vydavnychyi viddil KHU, 2008. 47 s.
Hirniak A.N. Psykhoanaliz Z. Froida yak teoriia, systema i sotsiokulturne yavyshche. A.N. Hirniak. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo. 2008. №4. S. 40-51.
Hrof S. Psykholohiia maibutnoho: uroky z suchasnykh doslidzhen svidomosti: [per. z anhl. Yaryny Vynnytskoi, Oleny Redchyts]. S. Hrof. Lviv: Afisha, 2015. 328 s.
Dzhems U. Psykholohyia. Uyliam Dzhems: [per. s anhl.; pod red. L.A. Petrovskoi]. M.: Pedahohyka, 1991. 368 s.
Zynchenko V.P. Myry soznanyia y struktura soznanyia. Vladymyr Zynchenko. Voprosy psykholohyy. 1991. № 2. S. 24-36.
Kazmyrenko V.P. Sotsyalnaia psykholohyia orhanyzatsyi: [monohrafyia]. Viacheslav Petrovych Kazmyrenko. K.: MZUUP, 1993. 384 s.
Kant I. Krytyka chystoho rozumu: [per. z nim. ta prym. I. Burkovskoho]. I. Kant. K.: Yunivers, 2000. 504 s.
Kon Y.S. Otkrytye Ya. Ihor Semenovych Kon. M.: Polytyzdat, 1978. 352 s.
Kon Y.S. V poyskakh sebia: Lychnost y ee samosoznanye. Ihor Semenovych Kon. M.: Polytyzdat, 1984. 335 s.
Kokhut Kh. Analyz samosty: Systematycheskyi podkhod k lechenyiu nartsyssycheskykh narushenyi lychnosty: [per. s anhl.]. Kh. Kokhut. M.: “KohytoTsentr”, 2003. 308 s.
Kochneva L.V. Problema samosoznanyia y psykholohycheskye uslovyia eho razvytyia v uchebnoi deiatelnosty studentov vuzov. L.V. Kochneva. Ynnovatsyy v obrazovanyy. 2006. №5. S. 84-96.
Kucherenko S. Metodolohichni pidkhody do vyvchennia samosvidomosti osobystosti pidlitkiv ta yunakiv. Svitlana Kucherenko. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo. 2009. №1. S. 134-151.
Leontev A.N. Deiatelnost. Soznanye. Lychnost. Aleksei Nykolaevych Leontev. M.: Polytyzdat, 1975. 304 s.
Lomov B.F. Ob issledovanii zakonov psykhiki. Borys Fedorovych Lomov. Psykholohycheskyi zhurnal. 1980. T.1, №1. S. 157-189.
Moskalets V.P. Psykholohiia osobystosti: navch. posib. dlia studentiv, aspirantiv, vykladachiv spets. psykholohiia, sots. pedahoh. ta in. Viktor Petrovych Moskalets. K.: Tsentr uchbovoi literatury, 2013. 416 s.
Osnovy psykholohii : pidruch. [dlia stud. vyshch. navch. zakl.]. za zah. red. O. V. Kyrychuka, V. A. Romentsia. [2-e vyd., stereotyp.]. K. : Lybid, 1996. 632 s.
Paryhyn B.D. Sotsyalno-psykholohycheskyi klymat kollektyva. Puty y metody izuchenyia: [monohrafyia]. Borys Dmytryevych Paryhyn; [pod red. V. A. Yadova]. Lenynhrad: Nauka, 1981. 192 s. (Yn-tut sotsyalno-ekonomycheskykh problem AN SSSR).
Petrovskyi V. A. Lychnost v psykholohii : paradihma subyektivnosti. Vadim Arturovych Petrovskyi. Rostov-na-Donu: Fenyks, 1995. 512 s.
Psykholohycheskaia entsyklopedyia. pod red. R. Korsyna, A. Auerbakha. [2-e izd.]. SPb.: Pyter, 2003. 1096 s.
Psykholohyia samosoznanyia: khrestomatyia. [red.-sost. D.Ia. Raihorodskyi]. Samara: Izd. Dom Bakhrar-M, 2000. 672 s.
Psykholohyia. Slovar. pod obshch. red. A.V. Petrovskoho, M.H. Yaroshevskoho. [2-e izd., yspravl. y dop.]. M.: Politizdat, 1990. 494 s.
Rodzhers K.R. Vzghliad na psykhoterapyiu. Stanovlenye cheloveka. Karl Rodzhers; per. s anhl. [obshch. red. i predysl. Isenynoi E.Y.]. M.: Izd. hruppa Prohress, Unyvers, 1994. 480 s.
Romenets V.A. Istoriia psykholohii KhKh stolittia: navch. posib. V.A. Romenets, I.P. Manokha. K.: Lybid, 1998. 992 s.
Rubynshtein S.L. Bytye i soznanye. Chelovek i mir. Serhei Leonydovych Rubinshtein. SPb.: Piter, 2003. 512 s. (Seryia Mastera psykholohyy).
Rubynshtein S. L. Osnovy obshchei psykholohii : ucheb. [dlia psykholohov, pedahohov, filosofov]. Serhei Leonydovych Rubinshtein. SPb. : Piter, 2000. 712 s. : il. (Seryia Mastera psikholohii).
Rudnev V.P. Kharakter i rasstroistva lichnosty. Patohrafyia y metapsykholohyia. V.P. Rudnev. M.: Nezavysymaia fyrma Klass, 2002. 272 s.
Skovoroda H. Narkis. Rozmova pro te : piznai sebe : tvory [v 2 t.]. Hryhorii Skovoroda. K. : AN URSR, 1961. T. 1. 1961. 640 s.
Slobodchykov V. Y. Osnovy psikholohycheskoi antropolohii. Psikholohyia cheloveka: Vvedenye v psikholohyiu subyektyvnosty: uch. posob. dlia vuzov. [V.Y. Slobodchykov, E.Y. Ysaev]. M. : Shkola-Press, 1995. 384 s.
Smyt N. Sovremennye systemy psykholohii: posob. dlia vyssh. uch. zav. Noel Smyt; [per. s anhl. N. Myronov, S. Rysev; pod obshch. red A. A. Alekseeva]. SPB.: Praim-EVROZNAK, 2003. 384 s. (Seryia Psikholohycheskaia entsyklopedyia).
Spirkin A.H. Soznanie i samosoznanie. A.H. Spirkin. M., 1972. 389 s.
Stolin V.V. Samosoznanie lichnosty: [monohrafyia]. Vladymyr Vladymyrovych Stolin. M.: MHU, 1983. 284 s.
Tatenko V.O. Volodymyr Andriiovych Romenets (1926-1998): zhyttia yak vchynok i podiia. V.O. Tatenko, T.M. Tytarenko. Romenets V.A., Manokha I.P. Istoriia psykholohii XX stolittia: navch. posib. dlia stud. vyshch. navch. zakl. K.: Lybid, 1998. S. 7-37.
Terletska L.H. Psykhichne zdorovia osobystosti. Tekhnolohiia samoanalizu : [monohrafiia]. Larysa Harriivna Terletska. K.: VPTs “Kyivskyi universytet”, 2003. 150 s.
Frankl V. Chelovek v poyskakh smysla: [sbornyk]. Viktor Frankl; [per. s anhl. y nem. D.A. Leonteva, M.P. Papushy, E.V. Edmana; obshch. red. L.Ia. Hozmana y D.A. Leonteva; vs. st. D.A. Leonteva]. M.: Prohress, 1990. 368 s.: yl. (B-ka zarubezhnoi psykholohyy).
Freid Z. “Ia” y “Ono”. Zyhmund Freid. “Ia” y “Ono”: v 2-kh kn. Tbylysy: Merany, 1991. Kn. 1. S. 351-392.
Freid Z. Vvedenye v psykhoanaliz: lektsii. Zyhmund Freid. M.: Nauka, 1989. 456 s.
Furman (Humeniuk) O. Metodolohichna model innovatsiino-psykholohichnoho klimatu eksperymentalnoi shkoly modulno-rozvyvalnoho typu. Oksana Furman (Humeniuk). Psykholohiia i suspilstvo. 2005. №4. S. 70-83.
Furman (Humeniuk) O. Metodolohiia piznannia osvitnoho vchynku v konteksti innovatsiino-psykholohichnoho klimatu. Oksana Furman (Humeniuk). Psykholohiia i suspilstvo. 2012. № 1. S. 47-81.
Furman (Humeniuk) O. Osoblyvosti sytuatyvnoho ta vikovoho rozvytku Ya-kontseptsii. Oksana Furman (Humeniuk). Psykholohiia i suspilstvo. 2005. №1. S. 46-62.
Furman (Humeniuk) O.Ie. Psykholohiia Ya-kontseptsii: [monohrafiia]. Oksana Yevstakhiivna Furman (Humeniuk). Ternopil: Ekonomichna dumka, 2002. 186 s.
Furman (Humeniuk) O.Ie. Psykholohiia Ya-kontseptsii: navch. pos. O.Ie. Furman (Humeniuk). Ternopil: Ekonomichna dumka, 2004. 310 s.
Furman (Humeniuk) O.Ie. Problematyka Ya u psykhoanalitychnii teorii Zygmunda Froida: [lektsiia]. Oksana Yevstakhiivna Furman (Humeniuk). Ternopil: Ekonomichna dumka, 2003. 34 s.
Furman (Humeniuk) O. Samotvorennia Ya-kontseptsii za modulno-rozvyvalnoi orhsystemy. Oksana Furman (Humeniuk). Psykholohiia i suspilstvo. 2001. №2. S. 33-76.
Furman (Humeniuk) O. Sotsialnyi format rozvytku Ya-kontseptsii. Oksana Furman (Humeniuk). Psykholohiia i suspilstvo. 2004. №3. S. 82-90.
Furman (Humeniuk) O.Ie. Spontanno-dukhovna orhanizatsiia Ya-kontseptsii universuma: [lektsiia]. Oksana Yevstakhiivna Furman (Humeniuk). Ternopil: Ekonomichna dumka, 2003. 40 s.
Furman (Humeniuk) O.Ie. Strukturno-funktsionalne vzaiemodopovnennia skladovykh Ya-kontseptsii liudyny. Oksana Yevstakhiivna Furman (Humeniuk). Sotsialna psykholohiia. 2005. №9. S. 29-37
Furman (Humeniuk) O.Ie. Teoriia i metodolohiia innovatsiino-psykholohichnoho klimatu zahalnoosvitnoho zakladu: Monohrafiia. Oksana Yevstakhiivna Furman (Humeniuk). Yalta-Ternopil: pidruchnyky i posibnyky, 2008. 340 s.
Furman A.A. Psykholohiia smyslozhyttievoho rozvytku osobystosti: [monohrafiia]. Anatolii Anatoliiovych Furman. Ternopil: TNEU, 2017. 508 s.
Furman A.V. Teoriia osvitnoi diialnosti yak metasystema. Anatolii Vasylovych Furman. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo. 2001. № 3. S. 105-144 ; 2002. № 3-4. S. 20-58.
Furman A. V. Modulno-rozvyvalne navchannia: pryntsypy, umovy, zabezpechennia: [monohrafiia]. Anatolii Vasylovych Furman. K.: Pravda Yaroslavychiv, 1997. 340 s.
Furman A.V. Svidomist yak ramkova umova piznannia i metodolohuvannia. A.V. Furman. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo. 2017. №4. S. 16-38.
Furman A.V., Furman (Humeniuk) O.Ie. Psykholohiia Ya-kontseptsii: Navch. pos. Anatolii Vasylovych Furman, Oksana Yevstakhiivna Furman (Humeniuk). Lviv: Novyi svit-2000, 2006. 360 s.
Furman O.Ie. Metodolohichna plan-karta doslidzhennia Ya-kontseptsii osobystosti . O.Ie. Furman: mat-ly Mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf. [«Sotsialno-psykholohichni vymiry profesiinoi maisternosti osobystosti v umovakh hlobalizovanoho svitu»], (Ternopil, 16-17 travnia 2013r.). MON Ukrainy, Ternopilskyi natsionalnyi ekonomichnyi universytet. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo: Spetsvypusk. Ternopil: Ekonomichna dumka, 2013. S. 14-15.
Furman O.Ie. Psykholohichni parametry innovatsiino-psykholohichnoho klimatu zahalnoosvitnoho navchalnoho zakladu: dys. … doktora psykhol. nauk: 19.00.07. Oksana Yevstakhiivna Furman. Odesa, 2015. 467.
Furman O. Model strukturno-funktsyonalnoi orhanyzatsyy Ya-kontseptsyy cheloveka. Oksana Furman. Problemy pedahohyky y psykholohyy: [nauch. peryod. yzd. mezhvuz. konsortsyuma. hl. red. Nayra Akopian]. Erevan: Armianskyi HPU, 2015. №2. S. 106-115.
Khramova V. Do problemy ukrainskoi mentalnosti. V. Khramova. Ukrainska dumka. K. Feniks, 1999. S. 3-35.
Khell L. Teorii lychnosty (Osnovnye polozhenyia, yssledovanyia y prymenenye). Lary Khell, Danyyl Zyhler; per. s anhl. S. Melenevskoi, D. Vyktorovoi. SPb.: Pyter-Press, 1997. 608 s. (Seryia «Mastera psykholohii»).
Chesnokova Y.Y. Problema samosoznanyia v psykholohii: [monohrafyia]. Iryna Ivanovna Chesnokova. M.: Nauka, 1977. 144 s.
Shchedrovitskii H.P. Izbrannye trudy. Heohryi Petrovych Shchedrovitskii; [red.-sost. A.A. Pyskoppel, L.P. Shchedrovytskyi]. M.: Shk. kult. polytyky, 1995. 760 s.
Yadov V.A. Dyspozytsyonnaia kontseptsyia lychnosty. V.A. Yadov. Sotsyalnaia psykholohyia v trudakh otechestvennykh psykholohov. SPb.: Pyter, 2000. S. 76-93.
Iamnytskyi V.M. Rozvytok zhyttietvorchoi aktyvnosti osobystosti: teoriia ta eksperyment: [monohrafiia]. Vadym Markovych Yamnytskyi. Odesa: PNTs APN Ukrainy. SVD Cherkasov M. P., 2006. 362 s.
Ianchuk V.A. Vvedenye v sovremennuiu sotsyalnuiu psykholohyiu: [ucheb. posobye dlia vuzov]. Vladymyr Aleksandrovych Yanchuk. Mn.: ASAAR, 2005. 768 s.
Baars B.J. A Cognitive Theory of Consciousness. Bernard J. Baars. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
Markus H. Self-schemata and processing information about the self. H. Markus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1977. P. 63-78.
Markus H. Possible Selves: The Interface between Motivation and the Self-Concept. H. Markus, P. Nurius: In Yardley K. , Honess T. (eds). Self and Identity: Psychological Perspectives. Wiley. 1987. P. 79-83.
Markus H.R. Cultural vaniation in self-concept; in G.R. Goethals, J. Strauss (eds. ) Multidisciplinary perspectives on the self. H.R. Markus, S. Kitayama. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1991. P. 103.
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
1. PROPOSED POLICY FOR JOURNALS THAT OFFER OPEN ACCESS
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
2. PROPOSED POLICY FOR JOURNALS THAT OFFER DELAYED OPEN ACCESS
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work [SPECIFY PERIOD OF TIME] after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).