Psychological debunking of myths about the omnipotence of artificial intelligence

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35774/pis2025.02.011

Keywords:

intelligence, subject, artificial intelligence

Abstract

In the modern world, where AI technologies are becoming an integral part of various spheres of human activity, it is important to critically evaluate, comprehensively analyze and psychologically argue the m y t h s that arise around these technologies. The object of study in the article is myth-making at the current stage of engineering and technical development of humanity, which is associated with unjustified speculations about the omnipotence and safety of AI for psycho-spiritual development and the existential essence of an individual, group, and society. The intentional subject of the study is the psychological debunking of the five most popular m y t h s about AI that are actively circulating in the current globalized world, namely, tales about omnipotence, neutrality, lack of threats, and the replacement of humans with such a fictional and false intelligence. Instead, there is a fully justified danger of the individual losing his own autonomy and unique identity in the era of the increasingly obvious dominance of intelligent machines. Essentially, it is about situational analysis, detailed identification and multiple reflection from the position of epistemological achievements of modern psychology not only as a humanistic science, but also as an omnipresent sphere of thought, the falsity and even fatal fallacy of widespread pop ideas about the exceptional usefulness, limitless possibilities and real dangers of this far-fetched or invented intelligence. It is proven with motivation that the above myths are distorted conscious stereotypes and potentially dangerous factors, primarily in the purely psychological sense of human existence, because they form misconceptions among the masses about the real possibilities and limitations of AI, and, in addition, they have a destructive effect on the public perception of information technologies and their correct use in everyday life. First of all, it is emphasized that artificial machine intelligence, despite all its grandiose achievements in automating and optimizing gaming, educational, and labor processes, is not capable of completely replacing humans or becoming neutral in its activities. Moreover, without proper control and ethical oversight, AI can be used not only for the benefit of society, but also for manipulation, violation of human rights, and even creating threats to social stability. All this emphasizes the importance of a comprehensive approach to the development and use of its technologies, where it is necessary to take into account both technical and ethical and purely psychomental aspects of human existence. Finally, it is concluded that the exceptional heuristic of a thorough interdisciplinary study of myths and mythologemes in theoretical, applied and purely psychological practice is necessary to enable the safe, constructive and effective use of AI in various spheres of globalized humanity in the future.

Author Biographies

  • Anatolii V. Furman

    Doctor of Psychological Sciences, Professor, Academician of the Academy of Sciences of the Higher School of Ukraine, Professor of the Psychology and Social Work Department of West Ukraine National University, Head of PO “Intellectual Headquarters of Civil Society”, co-chair of the Regional Branch of the Socio­logical Association of Ukraine, member of the National Union of Journalists of Ukraine, Editor-in-Chief of the “Psychology and Society” journal, Ternopil.

    a.furman@wunu.edu.ua

    ORCID: 0000-0003-1550-6955    

    ResearcherID: G-4932-2017

  • Yurii Mykoliuk

    a postgraduate student at the Department of Psychology and Social Work of the West Ukrainian National University, Ternopil.

    s.mykoliyk@wunu.edu.ua

References

Verkhovod, L.I., Hots, A.A., Zhurba, I.V. (2024). Shtuchnyy intelekt yak chastyna buttya suchasnoyi lyudyny: sotsial'no-filosofs'ka refleksiya [Artificial intelligence as part of the existence of modern man: socio-philosophical reflection]. Aktual'ni problemy filosofiyi ta sotsiolohiyi - Current problems philosophy and sociology, 47, 9-14 [in Ukrainian].

https://doi.org/10.32782/apfs.v047.2024.2

Holod, I. (2025). Dotsent Politekhniky rozviyav mify pro shtuchnyy intelekt [Associate professor of the Polytechnic University dispelled myths about artificial intelligence]. Tsentr komunikatsiyi L'vivs'koyi politekhniky - Communication center Lviv Polytechnic, 30 April, 4 p. [in Ukrainian].

Mel'nyk, M., Malynoshevs'ka, A., Androsovych, K. (2024). Heneratyvnyy shtuchnyy intelekt u psykholohiyi: naslidky ta rekomendatsiyi dlya nauky i praktyky [Generative artificial intelligence in psychology: implications and recommendations for science and practice]. Informatsiyni tekhnolohiyi i zasoby navchannya - Information technologies and teaching aids, 103(5), 188-206 [in Ukrainian].

https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v103i5.5748

Meniv, L.D. (2023). Vykorystannya shtuchnoho intelektu u sferi trudovykh vidnosyn ta yikh vplyv na prava pratsivnykiv [The use of artificial intelligence in the sphere of labor relations and their impact on the rights of employees]. International scientific and practical conference «Modern problems of science, education and society», SPC «Sciconf.com.ua», Kyiv, 26-28 March, 1004-1010 [in Ukrainian].

Obolens'kyy, O., Kosyts'ka, V., Rvach, A. (2023). Shtuchnyy intelekt u publichnomu upravlinni: vymohy, problemy ta ryzyky [Artificial intelligence in public administration: requirements, problems and risks]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats' «Vcheni zapysky» - Collection of scientific papers «Scientific notes», 33(4), 121-137 [in Ukrainian].

https://doi.org/10.33111/vz_kneu.33.23.04.10.068.074

Sydorchuk, Yu.M. (2017). Filosofs'ko-pravovi problemy vykorystannya shtuchnoho intelektu [Philosophical and legal problems of using artificial intelligence]. Pravo i suspil'stvo - Law and society, 3, chapter 2, 16-19 [in Ukrainian].

Skalats'ka, O.V. (2024). Mizhdystsyplinarnyy potentsial mediafilosofiyi u prostori shtuchnoho intelektu (ShI): filosofs'ky aspekty [Interdisciplinary potential of media philosophy in the space of artificial intelligence (AI): philosophical aspects]. Aktual'ni problemy filosofiyi ta sotsiolohiyi - Current problems of philosophy and sociology, 47, 151-156 [in Ukrainian].

Sukhorol's'kyy, P.M. (2020). Osnovy futurolohiyi [Fundamentals of Futurology]. L'viv. 628 p. [in Ukrainian].

Turuta, O.V., Turuta, O.P. (2022). Shtuchnyy intelekt kriz' pryzmu fundamental'nykh prav lyudyny [Artificial intelligence through the prism of fundamental human rights]. Naukovyy visnyk Uzhhorods'koho natsional'noho universytetu. Seriya: Pravo - Scientific bulletin of Uzhhorod National University. Series: Law, 71, 49-54 [in Ukrainian].

https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2022.71.7

Furman, A.V. (2021). Avtors'ka prohrama iz dystsypliny «Psykholohiya yak sfera myslediyal'nosti» [Author's program in the discipline «Psychology as a sphere of thought activity»]. Psykholohiya i suspil'stvo - Psychology and society, 1, 154-179 [in Ukrainian].

https://doi.org/10.35774/pis2021.01.160

Furman, A.V., Furman, O.Ye. (2021). Metodolohichna orhanizatsiya psykholohiyi yak sfery myslediyal'nosti [Methodological organization of psychology as a sphere of thought]. Psykholohiya i osobystist' - Psychology and personality, 2 (20), 9-45 [in Ukrainian].

https://doi.org/10.33989/2226-4078.2021.2.239951

Bostrom, N. (2016). Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 432 p. [in English].

Garcia, A.C.B., Garcia, M.G.P., Rigobon, R. (2024). Algorithmic discrimination in the credit domain: what do we know about it? AI & Society, 39, 2059-2098 [in English].

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01676-3

Huang, Ch. (2023). A Survey on Artificial Intelligence Ethics. IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence (Volume: 4, Issue: 4, August 2023), 799-819 [in English].

https://doi.org/10.1109/TAI.2022.3194503

Leavy, S., O'Sullivan, B., Siapera, E. (2020). Data, power and bias in artificial intelligence. 28 July, 5 p. [in English].

McKenzie, K.F., Kirby, J.F. (2021). General Kenneth F. McKenzie Jr. Commander of U.S. Central Command and Pentagon Press Secretary John F. Kirby Hold a Press Briefing. 17 September, 6 p. [in English].

Musk, E. The sheer insanity of that actual response from Google's AI is staggering! (Tesla, SpaceX, USA) [in English].

O'Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. New York: Crown. 272 p. [in English].

Russell, S. (2019). Human Compatible: Artificial Intelligence and the Problem of Control. New York: Viking. 352 р. [in English].

Turkle, Sh. (2011). Alone Together. New York: Basic Books. 387 p. [in English].

Downloads

Published

2025-09-09

How to Cite

Furman, Anatolii V., and Yurii Mykoliuk. “Psychological Debunking of Myths about the Omnipotence of Artificial Intelligence”. Psyhology & Society, vol. 92, no. 2, Sept. 2025, pp. 11-21, https://doi.org/10.35774/pis2025.02.011.