Categorical matrix of theoretical psychology

Authors

  • Anatoliy Furman Doctor of Psychological Sciences, Professor, Academician of the Academy of Sciences of the Higher School of Ukraine, Head of the Psychology and Social Work Department of Ternopil National Economic University, Head of PO “Intellectual Headquarters of Civil Society”, co-chair of the Regional Branch of the Sociological Association of Ukraine, member of the National Union of Journalists of Ukraine, Colonel-General of Ukrainian and foreign Cossacks, editor of the “Psychology and Society journal”, Ternopil. a.furman@tneu.edu.ua ORCID: 0000-0003-1550-6955 ResearcherID: G-4932-2017 http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1550-6955

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35774/pis2020.02.013

Keywords:

theoretical psychology, mental reality, psycho-spiritual reality, metaknowledge, subject thinking, philosophical methodology, concept, category, categorical profile of scientific school, metatheoretization

Abstract

The methodological research is devoted to the substantiation of the composition, structure, functions, content filling and features of interpretation and usage by the scientist-thinker the categorical matrix of theoretical psychology as an original world of metatheoretical self-reflexive thought-activity. At the same time the cyclical-deed organizational scheme to achieve this goal is purposefully implemented, which focuses on four interdependent fundamental perspectives-stages of cognitive creativity development: a) in the frameworks of outstanding achievements of the most influential scientific schools of domestic and foreign time-space of the XX-th century concerning the creation of a categorical system of psychological science in general and theoretical psychology in particular from different worldviews (situational component); b) in the format of the author’s definition of segments or dimensions of the subject field of this relatively new and so far little elaborated by intellectuals direction of modern psychology development (psychological cognition as a thought activity, fundamental problems of psychology, methodological principles and approaches, tasks, problem and versions of creation of psychology’s categorical order – motivational component); c) in a logically reasoned set of interdependent conditions, regularities, procedures and characteristics of implementation of a typological approach as an accurate, perfect and at the same time multi-module and multifunctional tool of professional methodological work (active component); d) in the complementarity of metatheoretization and reflexive methodologization, when analytical-synthetic mastering is subject to both available in psychological discourse conceptual and categorical definitions and formulations, and the canonical model of theoretical psychology, which essentially appears as an aspect of human existence and in a taxonomically perfect composition of harmonized between each other themes and categorical definitions (post-action component). For the transition from a naturalistic approach in cognition of mental reality and hence from numerous theories of mental and self-sufficient object-centered thinking to self-reflexive directed metatheoretization of psychological science over one’s own achievements on the historical canvas of humankind cultural development by actualizing universal resources of methodological thinking and, therefore, to the heights of theoretical psychology, the author substantiates a five-module methodological optics of the study of its categorical order, covering a functionally level-by-level set of lenses-tools of methodologization at the levels: s p e c i f i c – is a quaternary or quintet thought-scheme as a basic material-means of methodological activity implementation; s i n g u l a r – the construction of a categorical matrix, which allows the creation of 12 systematic taxa of categorical quaternity, semantically presenting theoretical psychology as a separate newly emerging conscious layer of human existence;                  s p e c i a l – a typological approach in the dialectical mosaic of its categories, principles, norms, procedures, parameters and intellectual means, which allows to obtain a perfect typology in its optimal invariant - the categorical matrix; g e n e r a l – the sphere of professional methodologization-as-practice, which is a dialectical continuation and thought-deed concretization of the world of methodology-as-teaching in its central link – methodological thinking; u n i v e r s a l – a vitacultural methodology that not only enriches the semiotic completeness of culture and expands the existential horizons of consciousness, but also enables the thought-active and thought-deed practice of high perfection. It is proved that, unlike numerical tables, categorical matrices on construction, semantic attachment, internal combination of elements, methodological purpose and functional field of influence on multiplication of ideal forms of thinking-thought activity of human conscious ability make original and heuristic, though supercomplicated tool of cognition and methodologization, and therefore characterize the latest stage in the evolution of rational-humanitarian knowledge in its core – the categorical genesis of both individual sciences and interdisciplinary directions of cognitive creativity. Five advantages of this self-sufficient author’s tool are rubriced and argued in the work: fundamentality of epistemic content filling, logicity  of form and way of obtaining categorical ensemble, optimality of structure and internal balance of taxonomic categories configuration, ideality of constructed and designed as a theoretical model of a holistic picture of categories in their harmonious synthesis, practicality in the broadest sense of freedom of metatheoretization, methodologization, thinking action and self-reflection with categories and taxa of the matrix. The optimal architectonics  of this matrix was found, which in the central (inner) part contains a systematics of 16 mutually agreed and in certain hierarchical combinations of grouped taxonomic categories, organized into eight taxa, and its outer contour, which forms two (horizontally and vertically) equally named, however different in aspects of consideration of the multidisciplinary object of metatheoretization, chains of dialectical categories “general – special – singular – specific – universal”, which are named as two mutually penetrated thematic bases, that receive the resulting boundaries below and above – generalization of the top achievements of theoretical psychology. In this way 12 categorical taxa were obtained, each of which can be subjected to a detailed study. Taking into account the advantages of the categorical matrix, its five main functions are substantiated and meaningfully characterized – structural-systemic, logical-cognitive, organizational-synthesizing, thought-communicative and instrumental-methodological, as well as, accordingly, has been pointed out on vitacultural, typological, taxonomic, system-thought-action and cyclically-deed approaches that implement these approaches, and on a number of principles that specify each of these approaches. With regard to the essential content filling of the categorical matrix proposed for the first time to the scientific society, it is comprehensively highlighted that behind each of the 12 quintetly ordered taxa of categories (five horizontally and vertically and two diagonally) there is either a direction or a school of theoretical psychology development or a methodological principle or approach in psychology, or a certain system or epistemic organization of psychological cognition or theoretical creativity. It is proved that the stated model of the matrix makes it possible for a psychologist-thinker to achieve a personified (motivated and comprehended) canvas of the categorical order of theoretical psychology, not only in revealing hitherto unknown and little understood dimensions-aspects of human existence, but also in curbing the emotional saturation, vagueness and organic spontaneity of actualized concepts of thinking as a life-giving core of lace of psychological categories, which realizes self-reflexive progress in the bosom of increasing the mental potential of one’s own conscious ability to learn and create psycho-spiritual in all possible forms and markers of its phenomenal manifestation. At the same time, it is concluded that the world of theoretical psychology is the most thoroughly founded and the most meaningfully enriched by the creative scientific achievements of the outstanding Ukrainian intellectual and worthy person Volodymyr Roments. In particular, his multi-volume author’s presentation  of the history of world’s psychology, which implements the fundamentals, regularities and norms of the deed’s principle in psychology from ancient times to the end of the twentieth century, contains that extremely important vitacultural material which not only appears as a product of psychological cognition and from which previously unseen horizons of the field of historical-psychological research are mentally spread, but also which can be subjected to repeated self-reflection of psychological science by its individual and collective subjects of creativity. This means that in the future the final philosophical-psychological field of reflection will be subject to renewal, which according to the deed principle is canonically constructed by the talent of Academician Romenets and which requires further methodological comprehension. At the same time, canonical psychology and its derivative epistemic formations (the procedure of canonization of psychological systems, the concept of psychological canon, etc.) in unity with psychosophy of the deed as a methodology of cognition of the sources and essence of human existence are specific cultural patterns of self-reflexively performed metatheoretization, which is implemented with the help of personally well-developed principles, postulates and means of philosophical methodologization (especially the deed principle and the method of action dialectics). In general, a new categorical matrix solves one of the most important tasks of theoretical psychology – provides analytically reasoned selection-construction of the optimal typology of categories by four main criteria:  a) by a methodological substantiationess of research tools and instruments of its construction, structure, content, interpretation and usage, b) by a conceptual-conscious completeness of psychological thinking about the mental and psycho-spiritual as separate aspects of human life in the socio-humanitarian sphere, c) by a horizon of conceptual-terminological complementarity of the fields of categories and themes involved, d) by a quantitative set and structural-functional invariance of categorical taxa. Finally, it is reasonably stated that the quintessence of the categorical composition of theoretical psychology at the level of the universal horizontally and vertically of the matrix is the act of metatheoretization in its spiral integrity of situational, motivational, action and post-action components and in the form of individual (personal) and group (representatives of a separate scientific school) implementation.

References

Miasoid, P. A. & Shatyrko, L. O. (Eds.). (2016). Akademik V. A. Romenets: tvorchist i pratsi [Akademiс V. A. Romenets: creativity and work]. Kyiv: Lybid [in Ukrainian].

Aliiev, Sh. & Miasoid, P. & Furman, A. V. (2012). Vchynkova pryroda praktyky (filosofsko-psyxolohichna interpretaciia tvorchoho dialogu V.A. Romencia iz M.M. Bahtinym) [Acting nature of practice (philosophical and psychological interpretation of the creative dialogue of V.A. Roments with M.M. Bakhtin)]. Psykholohiya i suspilstvo – Psychology and society, 3, 6–23 [in Ukrainian].

Balin, V. D. (2012). Vvedenie v teoreticheskuyu psihologiyu. [Introduction to theoretical psychology]. Saint Petersburg [in Russian].

Ball, H. O. (2017). Ratsiohumanistychna oriientatsiia v metodolohii liudynoznavstva [Rational humanistic orientation in the methodology of anthropology]. Kyiv: “SKD” [in Ukrainian].

Ball, H. (2015). Teoretychna psykholohiia yak tsaryna naukovosti i dukhovnosti (do vydannia ukrainskoho perekladu knyhy Filipa Lersha “Struktura osoby”) [Theoretical psychology as a field of science and spirituality (before the publication of the Ukrainian translation of Philip Lersch`s book “The Structure of the Person”)]. Psykholohiya i suspilstvo – Psychology and society, 3, 72–79 [in Ukrainian].

Bakhtin, M. (2019). Do filosofii vchynku [To the philosophy of action]. Psykholohiya i suspilstvo – Psychology and society, 1, 5–34 [in Ukrainian].

Vasylchenko, I. P. (2004). Vyshcha matematyka dlia ekonomichnykh spetsialnostei [Higher mathematics for economic specialties]. Kyiv: Kondor, [in Ukrainian].

Vasilyuk, F. E. (2003). Metodologicheskiy analiz v psihologii [Methodological analysis in psychology]. Moscow: MGPPGU, Smys [in Russian].

Shynkaryk, M. I. (Ed.). (2003). Vyshcha matematyka [Higher mathematics]. Ternopil: TNEU [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A. V. & Furman, O. I. & Shandruk, S. K. & Co (Eds.). (2019). Vitakulturna metodolohiia: antolohiia. Do 25-richchia naukovoi shkoly profesora A.V. Furmana [Viticultural methodology: an anthology. To the 25th anniversary of professor A.V. Furman’s Scientific School]. Ternopil: TNEU [in Ukrainian].

Gandmaher, F. R. (1988). Teoriya matrits [Matrix theory]. (Trans. from german). Moscow: Nauka [in Russian].

Shchedrovitskiy, P. H. & Danylova, V. L. (Eds.). (2010). Georgiy Petrovich Shchedrovitskiy. Moscow: ROSSPEN [in Russian].

Hetmantsev, V. D. (2001). Liniina alhebra i liniine prohramuvannia [Linear algebra and linear programming]. Kyiv: Lybid [in Ukrainian].

Hirniak, A. N. (2007). Zasib yak psykhodydaktychna katehoriia [Means as a psychodidactic category]. Vitakulturnyi mlyn – Viticultural mill, 6, 16–20 [in Ukrainian].

Huseltseva, M. (2020). Merezhevyi pliuralizm u psykholohii: perspektyvy poli metodolohii i transdystsyplinarnosti [Network pluralism in psychology: prospects for the field of methodology and transdisciplinarity]. Psykholohiya i suspilstvo – Psychology and society, 2, 43–60 [in Ukrainian].

Huseltseva M. S. (2017). Metodolohichna optyka yak instrument piznannia [Methodological optics as a tool of cognition]. Psykholohiya i suspilstvo – Psychology and society, 4, 39–55 [in Ukrainian].

Guseltseva, M. S. (2013). Evolyutsiya psihologicheskogo znaniya v smene tipov ratsionalnosti (istoriko-metodologicheskoe issledovanie) [Evolution of psychological knowledge in the change of types of rationality (historical and methodological research)]. Moscow: Akropol [in Russian].

Zinchenko, V. P. (2003). Teoreticheskiy mir psihologii [The theoretical world of psychology]. Voprosyi psihologii – Psychology issues, 5, 3–17 [in Russian].

Kant, I. (2001). Krytyka chystoho rozumu [Critique of pure reason]. (Trans. from german). Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Konverskiy, A. E. (2010). Logika traditsionnaya i sovremennaya [Traditional and modern logic]. Moscow: Ideya-Progress [in Russian].

Krymskyi, S. (2015). Piznannia yak transtsendentsii sofii i spokusa praktykoiu. Systema suchasnykh metodolohii [Cognition as the transcendence of Sophia and the temptation of practice. The system of modern methodologies]. (Furman, A.V. ed.). Ternopil: TNEU, 228–232 [in Ukrainian].

Krymskyi, S. B. (2009). Rankovi rozdumy [Morning Reflections]. Kyiv: Maisternia Biletskykh [in Ukrainian].

Mamardashvili, M. K. & Pyatigorskiy, A. M. (2011). Simvol i soznanie (Metafizicheskie rassuzhdeniya o soznanii, simvole i yazyike) [Symbol and consciousness (Metaphysical reasoning about consciousness, symbol and language)]. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya [in Russian].

Furman, A. V. & Furman, O. I. & Shandruk, S. K. & Co (2019). Metodolohiia i psykholohiia humanitarnoho piznannia. Do 25-richchia naukovoi shkoly profesora A. V. Furmana [Methodology and psychology of humanitarian cognition. To the 25th anniversary of professor A. V. Furman’s scientific school]. Ternopil: TNEU [in Ukrainian].

Miasoid, P. A. (2004). Zahalna psykholohiia [General psychology]. Kyiv: Vyshcha shkola [in Ukrainian].

Miasoid, P. A. (2011, 2013). Kurs zahalnoi psykholohii [General psychology course]. Kyiv: Aletra [in Ukrainian].

Miasoid, P. (2019). Pryntsyp istoryzmu i myslennia u psykholohii [The principle of historicism and thinking in psychology]. Psykholohiya i suspilstvo – Psychology and society, 3–4, 38–72 [in Ukrainian].

Miasoid P. A. (2016). Psykholohichne piznannia: istoriia, lohika, psykholohiia [Psychological cognition: history, logic, psychology]. Kyiv: Lybid [in Ukrainian].

Miasoid P. (2021) Teoriia v istorychnomu postupi psykholohichnoho piznannia [Theory in the historical progress of psychological cognition]. Psykholohiya i suspilstvo – Psychology and society, 1–2 (in press) [in Ukrainian].

Kyrychuk, O. V. & Romenets, V. A. (Eds.). (2006). Osnovy psykholohii [Fundamentals of psychology]. Kyiv: Lybid [in Ukrainian].

Petrovskiy, A. V. & Yaroshevskiy, M. G. (2001). Teoreticheskaya psihologiya [Theoretical psychology]. Moscow: Izd. centr “Akademiya” [in Russian].

Plotnikov, V. I. (2003). Tipologicheskiy podhod. Sovremennaya filosofiya: slovar [Typological approach. Modern philosophy: Dictionary]. Moscow: Akad. proekt, 464–471 [in Russian].

Myasoid, P. A. & Furman, A. V. (Eds.). (2012). Psykholohiia vchynku: Shliakhamy tvorchosti V.A. Romentsia [Psychology act: the way of creativity, of Romenets V. A.]. Kyiv: Lybid [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A. V. (Ed.). (2011). Psykholohiia i suspilstvo: Spetsvypusk, prysviachenyi 85-y richnytsi z dnia narodzhennia Volodymyra Andriiovycha Romentsia [Psychology and Society: Special issue dedicated to the 85th anniversary of the birth of Vladimir Andreevich Romenets.], 2, 1–190 [in Ukrainian].

Reus, A. G. & Zinchenko, A. P. (2003). Putevoditel po metodologii Organizatsii, Rukovodstva i Upravleniya: hrestomatiya po rabotam G. P. Schedrovitskogo [A guide to the methodology of Organization, Leadership and Management: a reader on the work of G.P. Shchedrovitsky]. Moscow: Delo [in Russian].

Putevoditel po osnovnyim ponyatiyam i shemam metodologii organizatsii, rukovodstva i upravleniya: hrestomatiya po rabotam G. P. Schedrovitskogo [A guide to the basic concepts and schemes of the methodology of Organization, Leadership and Management: a reader on the works of G.P. Shchedrovitsky]. (2004). Moscow: Delo [in Russian].

Romenets, V. A. (2005). Istoriia psykholohii: Starodavnii svit. Seredni viky. Vidrodzhennia [History of psychology: The ancient world. Middle Ages. Revival]. Kyiv: Lybid [in Ukrainian].

Romenets, V. A. (1990). Istoriia psykholohii ХVII stolittia [History of psychology of the XVII century]. Kyiv: Vyshcha shkola [in Ukrainian].

Romenets, V. A. (1993). Istoriia psykholohii epokhy prosvitnytstva [History of psychology of the Enlightenment]. Kyiv: Vyshcha shkola [in Ukrainian].

Romenets, V. A. (2007). Іstorіya psikhologіi ХIХ – pochanku ХХ stolіttia [History of Psychology XIX – early XX century]. Kyiv: Lybіd [in Ukrainian].

Romenets, V. A. & Manokha, P. I. (2017). Istoriia psykholohii XX stolittia [History of psychology of the twentieth century]. Kyiv: Lybid [in Ukrainian].

Romenets, V. A. (2013). Predmet i pryntsypy istoryko-psykholohichnoho doslidzhennia [Subject and principles of historical and psychological research]. Psykholohiya i suspilstvo – Psychology and society, 2, 6–27 [in Ukrainian].

Saveleva, M. Y. (2002). Vvedenie v metateoriyu soznaniya [Introduction to the metatheory of consciousness]. Kyiv: Vidavets PARA-PAN [in Russian].

Furman, A. V. (Ed.). (2015). Systema suchasnykh metodolohii: khrestomatiia u 4-kh tomakh [The system of modern methodologies: a textbook in 4 volumes]. Ternopil: TNEU [in Ukrainian].

Stopin, V. (2015). Kultura [Culture]. Psykholohiya i suspilstvo – Psychology and society, 1, 16–25 [in Ukrainian].

Styopin, V. S. (2000). Teoreticheskoe znanie: struktura, istoricheskaya evolyutsiya [Theoretical knowledge: structure, historical evolution]. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya [in Russian].

Tkachenko, O. M. (2009). Pryntsypy, katehorii i metodolohichni problemy psykholohii [Principles, categories and methodological problems of psychology]. Psykholohiya i suspilstvo – Psychology and society, 1, 45–133 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A. A. (2020). Metodolohiia psykholohichnoho piznannia smyslozhyttievoi sfery osobystosti [ethodology of psychological cognition of the meaning of life sphere of personality]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo – Psychology and society, 1, 5–34 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A. A. (2017). Psykholohiia smylozhyttievoho rozvytku osobystosti [Psychology of the meaning-life personality development]. Ternopil: TNEU [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A. V. & Biskup, V. S. & Morshchakova, O. S. (2019). Metodolohichne obgruntuvannia katehoriinoi matrytsi suchasnoi sotsiolohichnoi teorii. Zahalna sotsiolohiia [Methodological substantiation of the categorical matrix of modern sociological theory. General sociology]. Kyiv: Lira-K, 337–343 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A. V. (2011). Volodymyr Romenets yak metodoloh psykhosofiinoho dukhu [Volodymyr Romenets as a methodologist of psychosophical spirit]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo – Psychology and society, 2, 7–14 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A. V. (2013). Geneza nauky yak hlobalna doslidnytska prohrama: tsyklichno-vchynkova perspektyva [Genesis of science as a global research program: cyclical-action perspective]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo – Psychology and society, 4, 18–36 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A. V. & Hirniak, A. N. (2009). Psykhodydaktychna ekspertyza modulno-rozvyvalnykh pidruchnykiv [Psychodidactic examination of modular development textbooks]. Ternopil: TNEU, “Ekonomichna dumka” [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A. V. (2014). Zasadnychi umovy vynyknennia naukovykh shkil [Basic conditions for the emergence of scientific schools]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo – Psychology and society, 1, 49–58 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A. V. (2016). Ideia i zmist profesiinoho metodolohuvannia [The idea and content of professional methodology]. Ternopil: TNEU [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A. V. (2014). Katehoriinyi profil naukovoi shkoly [Categorical profile of the scientific school]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo – Psychology and society, 2, 23–39 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A. V. (2008). Katehoriohenez yak metodolohichna problema: vid rozvytku poniat do katehoriinoi modeli svitu [Categoriogenesis as a methodological problem: from the development of concepts to the categorical model of the world]. Vitakulturnyi mlyn – Viticultural mill, 7, 4–9 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A. V. (2008). Katehoriohenez yak napriam profesiinoho metodolohuvannia [Categoriogenesis as a direction of professional methodology]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo – Psychology and society, 2, 53–58 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A. V. & Kovalova, T. (2011). Katehoriina matrytsia vzaiemozviazku obraziv subiektyvnoi realnosti i psykholohichnykh chynnykiv samo aktualizatsii dorosloho [Categorical matrix of the relationship of images of subjective reality and psychological factors of self-actualization of the adult]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo – Psychology and society, 4, 72–81 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A. V. (2018). Metateoretychna mozaika zhyttia svidomosti [Metatheoretical mosaic of the life of consciousness]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo – Psychology and society, 3–4, 13–50 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A. V. (2018). Metateoretychni kontsepty piznannia svidomosti [Metatheoretical concepts of cognition of consciousness.]. Psykholohiia osobystosti – Personality psychology, 1 (9), 5–11 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A. V. (2019). Metateoretychna rekonstruktsiia predmetnoho polia kanonichnoi psykholohii [Metatheoretical reconstruction of the subject field of canonical psychology]. Psykholohiia osobystosti – Personality psychology, №1(10), 5–17 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A. V. (2019). Metodolohichna skhema vidnovlennia predmetnoho polia kanonichnoi psykholohii [Methodological scheme of restoration of the subject field of canonical psychology]. Vitakulturnyi mlyn – Viticultural mill, 21, 4–27 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A. V. (2017). Metodolohichna optyka tsyklichno-vchynkovoi orhanizatsii teorii yak systemy orhanizatsii ratsionalnoho znannia [Methodological optics of cyclic-action organization of theory as a system of organization of rational knowledge]. Vitakulturnyi mlyn – Viticultural mill, 19, 4–15 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A. V. (2019). Metodolohichne obgruntuvannia predmetnoho polia teoretychnoi psykholohii [Methodological substantiation of the subject field of theoretical psychology]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo – Psychology and society, 3–4, 5–37 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A. V. (2013). Metodolohiia paradyhmalnykh doslidzhen u sotsialnii psykholohii [Methodology of paradigmatic research in social psychology]. Kyiv; Ternopil: TNEU [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A. V. (2019). Metodolohiia yak sfera nauky, myslediialnosti, metodolohuvannia. Metodolohiia i psykholohiia humanitarnoho piznannia. Do 25-richchia naukovoi shkoly profesora A.V. Furmana [Methodology as a field of science, thinking, methodology. Methodology and psychology of humanities cognition. To the 25th anniversary of the scientific school of Professor A.V. Furman]. Ternopil: TNEU, 6–235 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A. V. (2005). Modulno-rozvyvalna orhanizatsiia myslediialnosti – skhema profesiinoho metodolohuvannia [Modular and developmental organization of thinking - a scheme of professional methodology]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo – Psychology and society, 4, 40–69 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A. V. (2017). Modulno-rozvyvalnyi orhprostir metodolohuvannia: arhumenty rozshyrennia [Modular-developmental organizational space of methodology: arguments of expansion]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo – Psychology and society, 1, 34–49 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A. V. (2013). Paradyhma yak predmet metodolohichnoi refleksii [Paradigm as a subject of methodological reflection]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo – Psychology and society, 3, 72–85 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A. V. (2011). Psykhokultura ukrainskoi mentalnosti [Psychoculture of the Ukrainian mentality]. Ternopil: Ekonomichna dumka [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A. V. & Morshchakova, O. (2013). Psykhokultura yak samoorhanizovana sfera liudskoho buttia [Psychoculture as a self-organized sphere of human existence]. Vitakulturnyi mlyn – Viticultural mill, 15, 4–12 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A. V. (2017). Svidomist yak ramkova umova piznannia i metodolohuvannia [Consciousness as a framework condition for cognition and methodology]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo – Psychology and society, 4, 16–38 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A. V. (2015). Svit metodolohii [The world of methodology]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo – Psychology and society, 2, 47–60 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A. V. (2007). Teoretychne obgruntuvannia systemy bazovykh kontseptiv psykholohichnoi diahnostyky [Theoretical substantiation of the system of basic concepts of psychological diagnostics]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo – Psychology and society, 4, 39–55 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A. V. (2014). Typy naukovykh shkil ta umovy yikh efektyvnoho funktsionuvannia [Types of scientific schools and conditions of their effective functioning]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo – Psychology and society, 3, 11–29 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A. V. (2006). Typolohichnyi pidkhid u systemi profesiinoho metodolohuvannia [Typological approach in the system of professional methodology]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo – Psychology and society, 2, 78–92 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A. V. (2001). Ukrainska mentalnist ta yii kulturno-psykholohichni koordynaty [Ukrainian mentality and its cultural and psychological coordinates]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo – Psychology and society, 1, 9–73 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A. V. (2003). Yak rozpiznaty naukovu shkolu [How to recognize a scientific school]. Naukovyi svit – Scientific world, 5, 14–16. [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A. V. & Shandruk, S. K. (2014). Orhanizatsiyno-diyalnisni ihry u vyshchiy shkoli [Organizational-activity games in high school]. Ternopil: TNEU [in Ukrainian].

Furman (Humeniuk), O. Y. (2008). Teoriia i metodolohiia innovatsiino-psykholohichnoho klimatu zahalnoosvitnoho zakladu [Theory and methodology of innovation-psychological climate of secondary school]. Yalta–Ternopil: Pidruchnyky i posibnyky [in Ukrainian].

Mikulinskiy, S. R. & Yaroshevskiy, M. G. & Kryober, G. & Shteyner G. (1977). Shkoly v nauke [Schools in Science]. Moscow: Nauka [in Russian].

Shchedrovitskiy G. P. (1995). Izbrannye trudy [Selected Works]; Piskoppel, A. A. & Shchedrovitskiy, L. P. (Eds.) Moscow: Shk. kult. politiki [in Russian].

Schedrovitskiy, G. P. (2001). Lektsii po metametodologii proektirovaniya [Lectures on design metamethodology]. http: www.shkp.ru / archive / second / 2001-1/4 [in Russian].

Shchedrovytskyi, H. (2013). Metodolohichne znachennia opozytsii naturalistychnoho i systemodiialnisnoho pidkhodiv [Methodological significance of the opposition of naturalistic and systemic approaches]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo – Psychology and society, 1, 40–47 [in Ukrainian].

Shchedrovytskyi, H. (2006). Orhanizatsiino-diialnisna hra yak nova forma orhanizatsii ta metod rozvytku kolektyvnoi myslediialnosti [Organizational-activity game as a new form of organization and method of development of collective thinking]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo – Psychology and society, 3, 58–69 [in Ukrainian].

Schedrovitskiy, G. P. (2004). Organizatsionno-deyatelnostnaya igra: Sbornik tekstov (2). Iz arhiva G.P. Schedrovitskogo [Organizational-activity game: Collection of texts (2). From the archive of G.P. Shchedrovitsky]. Vol. 9. Moscow: Nasledie MMK [in Russian].

Shchedrovytskyi, H. P. (2015). Syntez znan: problemy i metody [Synthesis of knowledge: problems and methods]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo – Psychology and society, 2, 61–83 [in Ukrainian].

Shchedrovytskyi, H. P. (2005). Skhema myslediialnosti – systemno-strukturna budova, znachennia i zmist [The scheme of mentality – the system-structural structure, meaning and content]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo – Psychology and society, 4, 29–39 [in Ukrainian].

Schedrovitskiy, G. P. (1997). Filosofiya. Nauka. Metodologiya [Philosophy. Science. Methodology]. Moskcow [in Russian].

Yaroshevskiy, M. G. (1983). Opponenskiy krug i nauchnoe otkryitie [Opponen circle and scientific discovery]. Voprosyi filosofii – Questions of philosophy, 10, 49–62 [in Russian].

Furman, A. V. (2016). Volodymyr Romenets as Architect of methodology of humanitarian cognition. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo – Psychology and society, 2, 11–24 [in English].

Issue

Section

Статті

How to Cite

Furman, Anatoliy. “Categorical Matrix of Theoretical Psychology”. Psyhology & Society, no. 2, Jan. 2021, pp. 13-51, https://doi.org/10.35774/pis2020.02.013.