The concept of development of future psychologists’ professional creative abilities

Authors

  • Serhiy Shandruk doctor of psychological sciences, professor, Honored Education Worker of Ukraine, professor of the psychology and social work department of Ternopil National Economic University, Head of the department for monitoring the quality of education and methodical work Ternopil National Economic University, Chairman of the subcommittee on social work of the scientific and methodological commission on health and social security of the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, а member of the editorial board and permanent author of the Psychology and Society journal, Ternopil ResearcherID: I-8105-2017 http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1544-622Х

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35774/pis2020.01.035

Keywords:

professional creativity, psychologist, professional creative abilities, creative personality

Abstract

The theoretical generalization and methodological solution of the actual problem - system development of professional creative abilities of future practical psychologists is carried out in the work. The results of the scientific substantiation and categorical analysis of the concepts of “creativity” and “creative professional abilities” are presented, and then on their foundation the conceptual basis of A.V. Furman’s cyclic-deed approach to the development of creative abilities of psychological profile students are defined. It has been established that in the structure of the readiness of professional psychologists, a significant role belongs to the creative component, namely to professional creativity as the ability of personality to display and creatively change the products of psychological work, becoming an active subject, responsible and ready to create individuality. The levels of development of the basic components of future psychologists’ professional creativity have been empirically detected and the interdependence of these components has been substantiated. The realization of creative grounds and practical aspects of the development of these abilities is conditioned by the establishment of certain regularities of their formation. In particular, there is: a) a progressive sequence of stages of the cyclical course of personal creative action, starting with the emergence of problematic situations, the identification of original solutions, the emergence of a motivated creative field and a full understanding of a new way of solving the problem and critical awareness of the personal dynamics and results of creation the creativity products; b) cyclicality of deployment of the creating process by personality the results of creation and features of search-and-brain creative work, determining the way-method to solve the problem and reflection of creatively-oriented self-actualization of personality; c)  metasystematic in the formation of professional creativity of the specialist as a set of search strategies (analogizing, combining, reconstructing, etc.), which is the basis of creative design of the original or personalized product; d) self-organization of the personality’s creative process as a synergistic integrity of intellectually and existentially coordinated behavioral and action stages of realization, which actualizes the potential of her volitional, mental, motivational, communicative activity and, as a consequence, stimulates the development of creative approach to the effective implementation of industrial or business tasks. The organizationally active game technology as an effective psychocultural form of training the psychologist-professional personality is substantiated and the expediency of using this technology to actualize the creative potential of future specialists of psychological profile and their readiness for productive work is proved. Fulfillment of principles and norms of the cyclical-gradual approach made it possible to enrich the substantive-semantic field of development of professional creative abilities of applicants for higher education. First of all, psychodidactic conditions are defined, that is, the development and implementation of such an educational model is carried out, which reflects the system-building unity of causes and circumstances in creative cognition and thought-producing activities, and thus realizes the accelerated formation of creative individuality. The proposed model contains a set of qualitative and quantitative characteristics-elements of both creativity in general and the creative potential of personality in particular, in the dynamics of the actualized creative process of professional improvement. The following components of the psychologist’s act of creativity are singled out in the psychological structure: emotional-cognitive (ability to situationally mobilize his psycho-energy, purposefulness, volitional resource of behavior), need-motivational (needs, motives, goals, other stimuli – desires, beliefs, etc., occurrence of the creative activity interest) communicative-productive (realization of the optimal style of communication, discussion of the creative act process, precise realization of creative actions) and professional-creative (conscious control over the result of his creative act and in terms of his creative development and / or individual achievements). Therefore, the development of the psychologist’s professional creative abilities is first and foremost a qualitative change of search creative activity spheres, their components and structural components by entering it into the sphere of productive activity. And it is better to develop this level of opportunity through the involvement of those psychological mechanisms that represent an influential system of different conditions, relationships, means, connections and actualization of other mental phenomena and tendencies that ensure the development of the abilities of creative individuality. The author’s methodological and theoretical models of the development of professional creative abilities on the basis of logical-psychological structure of the act in the complementarity of situational, motivational, active and after-action components, which made it possible to single out and describe the stages, phases, strategies and levels of the personally creative deed and realization by students-psychologists their own creative potential. The effectiveness of the proposed cyclically-deed technology of actualizing the creative abilities of students and the formation of their creative personality precisely as professional psychologists has been proved experimentally.

References

Miasoid, P. A. & Shatyrko, L. O. (Eds.). (2016). Akademik V. A. Romenets: tvorchist i pratsi [Akademiс V. A. Romenets: creativity and work]. Kyiv: Lybid [in Ukrainian].

Bogojavlenskaja, D. B. (2002). Psihologija tvorcheskih sposobnostej [Psychology of creativity]. Moscow: “Akademia” [in Russian].

Furman, A. V. & Furman, O. I. & Shandruk, S. K. & Co (2019). Vitakulturna metodolohiia: antolohiia. Do 25-richchia naukovoi shkoly profesora A. V. Furmana [Viticultural methodology: an anthology. To the 25th anniversary of professor A. V. Furman’s Scientific School]. Ternopil: TNEU [in Ukrainian].

Galamian, L. I. (2014). Osnovnye zakonomernosti tvorcheskoj dejatelnosti studentov i sposoby ee aktivizacii [The main laws of students creative activity and methods of its activation]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universitet – Bulletin of Volgograd State University. Vol 6, 1, 85-97 [in Russian].

Moliako, V. O. & Muzyka, O. L. (Eds.). (2006). Zdibnosti, tvorchist, obdarovanist: teoriia, metodyka, rezultaty doslidzhen [Abilities, creativity, talent: theory, methodology, research results]. Zhytomyr: Ruta [in Ukrainian].

Matiushkin, A. M. (1972). Problemnye situacii v myshlenii i obuchenii [Problematic situations in thinking and learning]. Moscow: Pedagogika [in Russian].

Mahmutov, M. I. (1975). Problemnoe obuchenie. Osnovnye voprosy teorii [Problematic training. The main issues of the theory]. Moscow: Pedagogika [in Russian].

Furman, A. V. & Furman, O. I. & Shandruk, S. K. & Co (2019). Metodolohiia i psykholohiia humanitarnoho piznannia. Do 25-richchia naukovoi shkoly profesora A. V. Furmana [Methodology and psychology of humanitarian cognition. To the 25th anniversary of professor A. V. Furman’s scientific school]. Ternopil: TNEU [in Ukrainian].

Modulno-rozvyvalna systema yak sotsiokulturna orhanizatsiia [Modular-developmental system as a socio-cultural organization]. (2002). Psykholohiya i suspilstvo (spetsvypusk) – Psychology and society (special issue), 3–4 [in Ukrainian].

Miasoid, P. A. (2016). Psykholohichne piznannia: istoriia, lohika, psykholohiia [Psychological knowledge: history, logic, psychology]. Kyiv: Lybid [in Ukrainian].

Ponomarev, I. A. Fazy tvorcheskogo processa [Phases of the creative process]. URL: http://www.practicalthinking.narod.ru/ponomarev/ponomarev.pdf [in Russian].

Myasoid, P. A. & Furman, A. V. (Eds.). (2012). Psykholohiia vchynku: Shliakhamy tvorchosti V. A. Romentsia [Psychology act: the way of creativity, of V. A. Romenets]. Kyiv: Lybid [in Ukrainian].

Psykholohiia i suspilstvo: spetsvypusk, prysviachenyi 85-y richnytsi z dnia narodzhennia Volodymyra Andriiovycha Romentsia – Psychology and Society: a special issue dedicated to the 85th anniversary of the birth of Volodymyr Romenets. (2011). Vol 2 [in Ukrainian].

Romenets, V. A. (2018). Vykhovannia tvorchykh zdibnostei u studentiv [Education of students creative abilities]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo – Psychology and society, 3–4, 178–223 [in Ukrainian].

Romenets, V. A. (2001). Psykholohiia tvorchosti [Psychology of creativity]. Vol. 2. Kyiv: Lybid [in Ukrainian].

Romenets, V. A. & Manokha, P. I. (2017). Istoriia psykholohii XX stolittia [History of psychology of the twentieth century]. Kyiv: Lybid [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A. A. (2016). Psykholohiia osobystosti: tsinnisno-oriientatsiinyi vymir [Personality psychology: value-orientation dimension]. Odesa: ONPU; Ternopil: TNEU [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A. V. (2014). Vstup do teorii osvitnoi diialnosti [Introduction to the theory of educational activity]. Ternopil: NDU MEO [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A. V. (2013). Heneza nauky yak hlobalna doslidnytska prohrama: tsyklichno-vchynkova perspektyva [Genesis of science as a global research program: a cyclical-action perspective]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo – Psychology and society, 4, 18–36 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A. V. (2016). Ideia i zmist profesiinoho metolohuvannia [The idea and content of professional methodologization]. Ternopil: TNEU [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A. V. (2019). Metodolohiia yak sfera nauky, myslediialnosti, metodolohuvannia [Methodology as a sphere of science, art, and methodology]. Metodolohiia i psykholohiia humanitarnoho piznannia – Methodology and psychology of humanitarian cognition, 6–235. Ternopil: TNEU [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A. V. (1997). Modulno-rozvyvalne navchannia: pryntsypy, umovy, zabezpechennia [Modular development training: principles, conditions, provision]. Kyiv: Pravda Yaroslavychiv [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A. V. (2007). Navchalna problemna sytuatsiia yak obiekt psykholohichnoho piznannia [Educational problem situation as an object of psychological knowledge]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo – Psychology and society, 1, 9–80 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A. V. (2013). Paradyhma yak predmet metodolohichnoi refleksii [The paradigm as a subject of methodological reflection]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo – Psychology and society, 3, 72–85 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A. V. (2014). Teoretychna model hry yak uchynennia [The theoretical model of the game as a teaching]. Nauka i osvita – Science and education, 5, 95–104 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A. V. (2007). Teoriia navchalnykh problemnykh sytuatsii: psykholoho-dydaktychnyi aspekt [Theory of educational problem situations: psycho-didactic aspect]. Ternopil: Aston [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A. V. & Shandruk, S. K. (2014). Orhanizatsiino-diialnisni ihry u vyshchii shkoli [Organizational and activity games in high school]. Ternopil: TNEU [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A. V. & Shandruk, S. K. (2014). Sutnist hry yak uchynennia [The essence of the game as a deed]. Ternopil: TNEU [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A. V. & Shandruk, S. K. (2014). Tsyklichno-vchynkova model hry yak ontofenomenalnoi danosti. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo – Psychology and society, 4, 24–74 [in Ukrainian].

Furman (Humeniuk), O. I. (2008). Teoriia i metodolohiia innovatsiino-psykholohichnoho klimatu zahalnoosvitnoho zakladu [Theory and methodology of innovation-psychological climate of the general educational institution]. Yalta-Ternopil: Pidruchnyky i posibnyky [in Ukrainian].

Shandruk, S. K. (2019). Metodolohichne obhruntuvannia teorii rozvytku profesiinykh tvorchykh zdibnostei osobystosti [Methodological substantiation of the theory of development of professional creative abilities of the individual]. Metodolohiia i psykholohiia humanitarnoho piznannia – Methodology and psychology of humanitarian cognition, 363–454. Ternopil: TNEU [in Ukrainian].

Shandruk, S. K. (2012). Psykholohichni osoblyvosti zahalnoi i tvorchoi obdarovanosti pidlitkiv [Psychological features of general and creative talent of teenagers]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo – Psychology and society, 4, 161–166 [in Ukrainian].

Shandruk, S. K. (2015). Psykholohiia profesiinykh tvorchykh zdibnostei [Psychology of professional creative abilities]. Ternopil: Ekonomichna dumka [in Ukrainian].

Shandruk, S. K. (2015). Teoretychna model rozvytku profesiinykh tvorchykh zdibnostei osobystosti praktychnoho psykholoha [Theoretical model of development of professional creative abilities of the personality of the practical psychologist]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo – Psychology and society, 4, 107–121 [in Ukrainian].

Shchedrovytskyi, H. P. (2006). Orhanizatsiino-diialnisna hra yak nova forma orhanizatsii ta metod rozvytku kolektyvnoi myslediialnosti [Organizational-activity game as a new form of organization and method of development of collective thinking]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo – Psychology and society, 3, 58–69 [in Ukrainian].

Shhedrovickiy, G. P. (2004). Oraganizacionno-deyatelnostnaya igra [Organization-activity game]. Iz arhiva G.P. Shhedrovickogo – From the archive of G.P. Shchedrovitsky. Vol. 9. Moscow: Nasledie MMK [in Russian].

Shandruk, S. K. (2015). Theoretical-methodological foundtions organization of training-produktive activity of dtudents-psychologists. Naukovyi ogliad – Scientific review, 7 (17), 134–144 [in English].

Issue

Section

Статті

How to Cite

Shandruk, Serhiy. “The Concept of Development of Future psychologists’ Professional Creative Abilities”. Psyhology & Society, no. 1, May 2020, pp. 35-55, https://doi.org/10.35774/pis2020.01.035.