Methodologies of psychological science updating
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35774/pis2018.01.027Keywords:
methodology, psychology of modernity, transitivity, sociocultural changes, cultural-analytical approach, methodological opticsAbstract
The methodological toolkit of psychology designed to study a stable and clearly structured world is powerless not only to comprehend, but also to reveal complex realities of fluid and situational changes. The ongoing transformations of the information and socio-cultural environment led to a special mobility and variability of cultural and psychological processes in the formation of the identity of modern man. In this fundamentally new situation the psychology faced the task of updating its thesaurus and discourses, methodological tools, ways of looking at the world, and styles of scientific thinking. The psychology of modernity is a new research trend, taking into account the current changes in the cognitive and sociocultural situation; studying the features of socialization and the emergence of the identity of the younger generations in a transforming world; and also the comprehending reflection of all these complex and mixed processes in the methodology of psychological science. The productive role of mixed methods, synthetic methodologies and transdisciplinary research strategies allowing to comprehend complex and mobile cultural and psychological realities is proved. On the example of analysis and correlation of the concepts of “personality”, “individuality”, “subject”, “subjectivity” in contemporary Russian psychology the work of the construct “methodological optics” is promoted contributing to the integration of psychological knowledge and also reveals how the conceptual and terminological diversity emphasizes (and reveals) various aspects of the reality being studied.
References
Antsyferova, L. I. Psikhologicheskoe soderzhanie fenomena sub’ekt i granitsy sub’ektno-deyatel’nostnogo podkhoda [Tekst]. L. I. Antsyferova. Antsyferova L. I. Razvitie lichnosti i problemy gerontopsikhologii. M. : IP RAN, 2004. S. 350-366. [In Russian].
Asmolov, A. G. Psikhologiya lichnosti. Kul’turno-istoricheskie ponimanie razvitiya cheloveka [Tekst]. A. G. Asmolov. M. : Smysl, 2007. 528 s. [In Russian].
Asmolov, A. G. Psikhologiya sovremennosti: vyzovy neopredelennosti, slozhnosti i raznoobraziya [Elektronnyi resurs]. A. G. Asmolov. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya. 2015. T. 8. № 40. S. 1. URL: http://psystudy.ru (data obrashcheniya: 05.05.2015). [In Russian].
Bauman, Z. Tekuchaya sovremennost’ [Tekst]. Z. Bauman. SPb. : Piter, 2008. 240 s. [In Russian].
Bek, U. Obshchestvo riska. Na puti k drugomu modernu [Tekst]. U. Bek. M. : Progress-Traditsiya, 2000. 383 s. [In Russian].
Belinskaya, E. P. Chelovek v izmenyayushchemsya mire. sotsial’no-psikhologicheskaya perspektiva [Tekst]. E. P. Belinskaya. M. : Prometei, 2005. 319 s. [In Russian].
Brushlinskii, A. V. Problemy psikhologii sub’ekta [Tekst]. A. V. Brushlinskii. M. : IP RAN, 1994. 346 s. [In Russian].
Brushlinskii, A. V. Psikhologiya sub’ekta [Tekst]. A. V. Brushlinskii. M. : Aleteiya, 2003. 272 s. [In Russian].
Vygotskii, L. S. Istoriya razvitiya vysshikh psikhicheskikh funktsii [Tekst]. L. S. Vygotskii. Vygotskii L. S. Sobr. soch. : v 6 t. M. : Pedagogika, 1983. T. 3. S. 5-328. [In Russian].
Giddens, E. Posledstviya sovremennosti [Tekst]. E. Giddens. M. : Praksis, 2011. 352 s. [In Russian].
Giddens, E. Uskol’zayushchii mir. Kak globalizatsiya menyaet nashu zhizn’. [Tekst]. E. Giddens. M. : Ves’ mir 2004. 120 s. [In Russian].
Girenok, F. Udovol’stvie myslit’ inache [Tekst]. F. Girenok. M. : Akademicheskii proekt, 2008. 235 s. [In Russian].
Gusel’tseva, M. S. Kul’turno-analiticheskii podkhod k izucheniyu evolyutsii psikhologicheskogo znaniya : diss. .. dokt. psikhol. nauk [Tekst]. M. S. Gusel’tseva. M., 2015a. . 459 s. [In Russian].
Gusel’tseva, M.S. Kul’turno-analiticheskii podkhod k sotsializatsii lichnosti v tranzitivnom obshchestve [Tekst]. M. S. Gusel’tseva. Psikhologіya osobistostі : Naukovii teoretiko-metodologіchnii і prikladnii psikhologіchnii zhurnal. 2013a. № 1 (4). S. 20-38. URL: http://ps.pu.if.ua/2013_4/2Gus.pdf [In Russian].
Gusel’tseva, M.S. Kul’turno-deyatel’nostnaya traditsiya: stanovlenie i razvitie [Tekst]. M. S. Gusel’tseva. Voprosy psikhologii. 2015b. № 4. S. 3-14. [In Russian].
Gusel’tseva, M.S. Sotsial’noe prostranstvo osnovanie dlya poliparadigmal’nogo sinteza [Elektronnyi resurs]. M. S. Gusel’tseva. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya. . 2013b. T. 6. № 30. URL: http://psystudy.ru (data obrashcheniya: 08.11.2013). [In Russian].
Gusel’tseva, M.S., Izotova E.I. Pozitivnaya sotsializatsiya detei i podrostkov: metodologiya i empirika. Monografiya [Tekst]. M. S. Gusel’tseva, E. I. Izotova. M. : Smysl, 2016. 320 s. [In Russian].
Zinchenko, V.P. Sub’ektivnye zametki o psikhologicheskoi diagnostike [Elektronnyi resurs]. V. P. Zinchenko. Razvitie lichnosti. 2001. № 3-4. URL: http://rl-online.ru/articles/3_4-01/194.html (data obrashcheniya: 20.10.2016). [In Russian].
Znakov, V. V. Sub’ektno-analiticheskii podkhod v psikhologii ponimaniya [Elektronnyi resurs]. V. V. Znakov. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya. 2015. T. 8. № 42. S. 12. URL: http://psystudy.ru (data obrashcheniya: 05.05.2015). [In Russian].
Knyazeva, E. N. Transdistsiplinarnye strategii issledovanii [Elektronnyi resurs]. E. N. Knyazeva. Vestnik TGPU (TSPU Bulletin). 2011. № 10 (112). S. 193-201. URL: http://iph.ras.ru/uplfile/evolep/helena/knyazeva_e-_n-_193_2.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 05.05.2015). [In Russian].
Kozlova, N. N., Smirnova, N. M. Krizis klassicheskikh metodologii i sovremennaya poznavatel’naya situatsiya [Tekst]. N. N. Kozlova, N. M. Smirnova. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 1995. № 11. S. 12-22. [In Russian].
Kornilova, T. V. Perspektivy dinamicheskoi paradigmy v psikhologii vybora [Elektronnyi resurs]. T. V. Kornilova. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya. 2014. T. 7. № 36. S. 2. URL: http://psystudy.ru (data obrashcheniya: 05.05.2015). [In Russian].
Leont’ev, D. A. Novye orientiry ponimaniya lichnosti v psikhologii: ot neobkhodimogo k vozmozhnomu [Tekst]. D. A. Leont’ev. Voprosy psikhologii. 2011. № 1. S. 3-27. [In Russian].
Leont’ev, D. A. Ekzistentsial’nyi podkhod v sovremennoi psikhologii lichnosti [Tekst]. D. A. Leont’ev. Voprosy psikhologii. 2016. № 3. S. 3-15. [In Russian].
Limonov, E. Svyashchennye monstry [Tekst]. E. Limonov. M.: Ad Marginem, 2004. 222 s. [In Russian].
Martsinkovskaya, T. D. Informatsionnaya sotsializatsiya v izmenyayushchemsya informatsionnom prostranstve [Elektronnyi resurs]. T. D. Martsinkovskaya. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya. 2012a. T. 5. № 26. S. 7. URL: http://psystudy.ru (data obrashcheniya: 20.10.2016). [In Russian].
Martsinkovskaya, T. D. Kul’tura i subkul’tura v prostranstve psikhologicheskogo khronotopa [Tekst]. T. D. Martsinkovskaya. M.: Smysl, 2016. 271 s. [In Russian].
Martsinkovskaya, T. D. Sovremennaya psikhologiya. vyzovy tranzitivnosti [Elektronnyi resurs]. T. D. Martsinkovskaya. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya. 2015b. T. 8. № 42. S. 1. URL: http://psystudy.ru (data obrashcheniya: 19.11.2015). [In Russian].
Mokii, V. S. Osnovy transdistsiplinarnosti [Tekst]. V. S. Mokii. Nal’chik: El’-Fa, 2009. 368 s. [In Russian].
Nitsshche, F. Sochineniya v 2 tomakh. T. 2. [Tekst]. F. Nitsshe. M.: Mysl’, 1990. 829 s. [In Russian].
Podd’yakov, A. N. Komplikologiya: sozdanie razvivayushchikh, diagnostiruyushchikh i destruktivnykh trudnostei [Tekst]. A. N. Podd’yakov. M.: Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki, 2014. 278 s. [In Russian].
Razrabotka i realizatsiya printsipa razvitiya v sovremennoi psikhologii [Tekst]. pod red. A.L. Zhuravleva, E.A. Sergienko. M.: IP RAN, 2016. [In Russian].
Rubinshtein, S. L. Bytie i soznanie. Chelovek i mir [Tekst]. S. L. Rubinshtein. SPb.: Piter, 2003. 512 s. [In Russian].
Sergienko, E. A. Mezhparadigmal’nye mosty [Elektronnyi resurs]. E. A. Sergienko. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya. 2016. T. 9. № 48. S. 4. URL: http://psystudy.ru (data obrashcheniya: 20.10.2016). [In Russian].
Sergienko, E. A. Model’ psikhicheskogo i sotsial’noe poznanie [Elektronnyi resurs]. E. A. Sergienko. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya. 2015. T. 8. № 42. S. 6. URL: http://psystudy.ru (data obrashcheniya: 19.11.2015). [In Russian].
Sergienko, E. A. Printsipy psikhologii razvitiya: sovremennyi vzglyad [Elektronnyi resurs]. E. A. Sergienko. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya. 2012. T. 5. № 24. S. 1. URL: http://psystudy.ru (data obrashcheniya: 14.10.2015). [In Russian].
Sergienko, E. A. Sistemno-sub’ektnyi podkhod: obosnovanie i perspektiva [Tekst]. E. A. Sergienko. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2011. T. 32. № 1. S. 120-132. [In Russian].
Sovremennye metodologicheskie strategii: Interpretatsiya. Konventsiya. Perevod. Koll. monografiya [Tekst]. pod obshch. red. B. I. Pruzhinina, T. G. Shchedrinoi. M.: Politicheskaya entsiklopediya, 2014. [In Russian].
Sub’ekt, lichnost’ i psikhologiya chelovecheskogo bytiya [Tekst]. pod red. V. V. Znakova, Z. I. Ryabikinoi. M.: IP RAN, 2005. 384 s. [In Russian].
Taleb, N. Antikhrupkost’. Kak izvlech’ vygodu iz khaosa [Tekst]. N. Taleb. M.: KoLibri, 2014. 768 s. [In Russian].
Tatenko, V.A. Psikhologiya v sub’ektnom izmerenii: monografiya [Tekst]. V. A. Tatenko. K.: Vidav. tsentr “Prosvita’, 1996. 404 s. [In Russian].
Tatenko, V. A. Problemy sub’ekta v sovremennoi psikhologii (ukrainskaya shkola) [Tekst]. V. A. Tatenko. Filosofsko-psikhologicheskoe nasledie S. L. Rubinshteina. otv. red. K. A. Abul’khanova. M. : IP RAN, 2011. C. 371-387. [In Russian].
Fuko, M. Volya k istine: po tu storonu znaniya, vlasti i seksual’nosti. Raboty raznykh let [Tekst]. M. Fuko. M. : Kastal’, 1996. 448 s. [In Russian].
Khuzeeva, G. R. Izuchenie protsessov sotsializatsii i individualizatsii detei starshego doshkol’nogo vozrasta [Tekst]. G. R. Khuzeeva. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya. 2017. T. 10. № 54. S. 8. URL : http://psystudy.ru (data obrashcheniya: 09.12.2017). [In Russian].
Chiksentmikhaii, M. V poiskakh potoka: Psikhologiya vklyuchennosti v povsednevnost’ [Tekst]. M. Chiksentmikhaii. M.: Al’pina non-fikshn, 2011. 194 s. [In Russian].
Epstein, M. PreDictionary: Experiments in Verbal Creativity [Текст]. M. Epstein. N.Y.: Franc-Tireur USA, 2011. 135 p. [In English].
Gusel’tseva, M. S. Metodologіchna optika yak іnstrument pіznannya [Tekst]. M. S. Gusel’tseva. Psikhologіya і suspіl’stvo: ukr. teoret.-metod. sotsіogumanіt. chasop. 2017. № 4 (70). S. 39-55. [In Ukrainian].
Furman, A.V. Metodolohichna optyka tsyklichno-vchynkovoi orhanizatsii teorii yak systemy ratsionalnoho znannia [Tekst]. A.V. Furman. Vitakulturnyi mlyn: metodol. almanakh. 2017. Modul 19. S. 4-15.
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
1. PROPOSED POLICY FOR JOURNALS THAT OFFER OPEN ACCESS
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
2. PROPOSED POLICY FOR JOURNALS THAT OFFER DELAYED OPEN ACCESS
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work [SPECIFY PERIOD OF TIME] after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
