Humanistic flow in psychology

Authors

  • Roman Tratch American psychologist of Ukrainian origin, a doctor of philosophy, a professor, a member of the National Academy of Pedagogical Sciences of Ukraine, a member of the American Psychological Association (APA), a member of the Association of Humanistic Psychology (AHP), professor of psychology at the National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy, Honored Professor of Psychology at St. John Fisher College, Member of the Taras Shevchenko Scientific Society (NTShA), permanent author and member of the editorial board of the journal Psychology and Society

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35774/pis2017.02.033

Keywords:

western psychology, human psychic processes, natural science psychology, explanation, understanding, descriptive psychology, experimental psychology, behaviorism, teaching

Abstract

It is presented in the article in the historical-analytical aspect the distinction and is highlighted conceptual-categorical and psychophenomenal features of the rise and development of the three main streams of the progress of the psychological science over the last one and a half century, namely, natural sciences, psychoanalytic and humanistic. Limited explanatory possibilities of the first two in their various branches are argued and, in return, the heuristic opportunities and prospects of the development of the third stream as the most human-centric and encouraging, concerning the risks of technogenic civilization and the dominance of the global scale of human consumption over the processes of nature-conservation production and the creation of society.

References

Ball, G.A. (1993). Koncepcija samoaktualizacii lichnosti v gumanisticheskoj psihologіi. K.-Donetsk: Rovesnik. 32 s. [In Russian].

Ball, G.A. (2006). Psihologija v raciogumanisticheskoj perspektive: Izbrannyje trudy. K.: Osnova. 408 s. [In Russian].

Humanistychna psykholohiia: Antolohiia: [navch. pos.]: u 3-kh t. . uporiadn. i nauk. red. Roman Trach (USA) i Heorhii Ball (Ukraine). K.: Univ. vyd-vo Pulsary, 2001. Tom 1: Humanistychni pidkhody u zakhidnii psykholohii KhKh st. 252 s. [In Ukrainian].

Humanistychna psykholohiia: Antolohiia: [navch. pos.]: u 3-kh t. . uporiadn. i nauk. red. Roman Trach (SShA) i Heorhii Ball (Ukraina). K.: Univ. vyd-vo Pulsary, 2001. Tom 2: Psykholohiia i dukhovnist: (svitohliadni aspekty humanistychno zoriientovanykh napriamiv u suchasnii zakhidnii psykholohii). 2005. 279 s. [In Ukrainian].

Shykarenko‚ O. (1996). Etychnyi potentsial “filosofii sertsia” Pamfila Yurkevycha . Filosofska i sotsiolohichna dumka. № 3-4 [In Ukrainian].

Dilthey, W. (1931). Ideen ьber eine beschreibende und zergliedernde Psychologie . Dilthey, W. Gesammelte Schriften. Bd. 5. Leipzig:Teubner [In English].

Diamond, S. (1974). In search of the primitive. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction [In English].

Frankl, V.E. (1963). Маn’s search for meaning. New York: Washington Square [In English].

Fromm, E. (1968). The revolution of hope. –New York: Rinehart [In English].

Impara, J.C. & Plake, B.S. (Eds.) (1998). The Thirteenth Mental Measurements Yearbook. Lincoln, NB: Buros Insitute of Mental Measurements [In English].

Lane, R.E. (2000). The loss of happiness in market democracies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press [In English].

Lersch, Ph. (1970). Aufbau der Person: 11 Aufl. Mьnchen: J.A. Barth [In English].

Maslow, A.H. (1970). Motivation and Personality: 3rd ed. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley [In English].

May, R. , Angel, E. & Ellenberger, H.F. (Eds.) (1958). Existence: A New Dimension in Psychiatry and Psychology. New York: Basic Books [In English].

Plake, B.S. & Impara, J.C. (Eds.) (1999). Supplement to the Thirteenth Mental Measurements Yearbook. Lincoln, NB: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements [In English].

Rogers, C.R. (1942). Counseling and Psychotherapy. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin [In English].

Issue

Section

Статті

How to Cite

Tratch, Roman. “Humanistic Flow in Psychology”. Psyhology & Society, no. 2, Mar. 2019, pp. 33-40, https://doi.org/10.35774/pis2017.02.033.