Subject field of psycho-culture: the rational reconstruction of theoretical ideas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35774/pis2017.01.050Keywords:
rational reconstruction of science, research program, cultural psychology, psychological culture, psycho-culture, mentality, societal psyche, vita-cultural paradigm, professional methodologizationAbstract
The article presents a research of the problem of interaction of mind and culture as a “unique self-developing systems”. For the sake of a better understanding of peculiarities of becoming of concept-notion of psycho-culture is implemented an attempt to build a rational reconstruction of theoretical ideas about given phenomenon as a highly complex sphere of social reality in the context of vita-cultural paradigm (by the concept of A.V. Furman). Based on the proposed thought-scheme is disclosed and substantiated the succession of motion-development of the category “psycho-culture”: from cultural and cross-cultural psychology (thesis) to the psychological culture (antithesis) that is logically integrated as a result of synthesis into a life of psycho-culture. It is claimed that “psycho-culture” and “psychological culture” unreasonably are singled out by researches as interchangeable categorical concepts and identified with pedagogical competence and professional perfecting of the personality. In the framework of indicated problem the most methodologically mature arises philosophical-psychological concept of A. V. Furman, in which he considers psycho-culture as certain historically conditioned, dynamic, program-spiritual setting of a large or localized society in one or another way of their life activity (in the forms of behavior, activity, communication, commitment), which ensures the survival, reproduction and renewal psychosocial vitality of separate communities and groups very first ideas, settings, values, ideas, norms and models of people’s action, national mentality and societal psyche in general. As a result of critical-constructive rethinking of the relationship of psyche and culture from the standpoint of a professional methodologization had built model-configurator of cognition the psycho-culture that structurally reflects objectively existing relationships between fundamental concepts.
References
Abaev N. V. Chan’-buddizm i kul’tura psihicheskoj dejatel’nosti v srednevekovom Kitae [Jelektronnyj resurs] . N. V. Abaev. Rezhim dostupa: www. litmir. net. br. ?b=209080 [in Russian].
Ardashova Ya. I. Psykhokultura v konteksti kulturnoho postupu suspilstva [Elektronnyi resurs] . Ya. I. Ardashova . Filosofiia i politolohiia v konteksti suchasnoi kultury. 2015. № 1. S. 11-18. Rezhym dostupu: file:. D:. Downloads. filipol_2015_1_4%20(1). pdf [in Ukrainian].
Ball H. Intehratyvno-osobystisnyi pidkhid u psykholohii: vporiadkuvannia holovnykh poniat . H. Ball . Psykholohiia i suspilstvo. 2009. № 4. S. 25-53. [in Ukrainian].
Berdiaiev M. Problema etychnoho piznannia . Mykola Berdiaiev . . Psykholohiia i suspilstvo. 2016. №4. S. 17-29. [in Ukrainian].
Brenner O. Ratsionalna rekonstruktsiia istorii psykholohii yak metafizychna problema metodolohii psykholohii [Elektronnyi resurs] . Oleksandr fon Brenner. Rezhym dostupu: http:. ukrarticles. pp. ua. nauka. 11434-racionalnaya-rekonstrukciya-istorii-psixologii-kak-metafizicheskaya-problema-metologii-psixologii. html [in Ukrainian].
Burkalo N. I. Osoblyvosti kroskulturnykh doslidzhen v psykholohii [Elektronnyi resurs] . N. I. Burkalo. Rezhym dostupu: http:. www. rusnauka. com. 36_PVMN_2012. Psihologia. 12_123663. doc. htm [in Ukrainian].
Humeniuk (Furman) O. Ye. Spontanno-dukhovna orhanizatsiia Ya-kontseptsii universuma: lektsiia. Ternopil: Ekonomichna dumka, 2003. 40 s. [in Ukrainian].
Gusel’ceva M. S. Kul’turno-psihologicheskij analiz v psihologii i smezhnyh naukah [Elektronnyj resurs] . M. S. Gusel’ceva . Psihologicheskie issledovanija: jelektronnyj nauchnyj zhurnal. 2009. № 2(4). Rezhim dostupa: http:. psystudy. ru[in Russian].
Danyliuk I. Kulturna psykholohiia yak okremyi napriam etnichnoi psykholohii . Ivan Danyliuk . Sotsialna psykholohiia. 2008. № 4. S. 86-93. [in Ukrainian].
Dialektyka [Elektronnyi resurs]. Rezhym dostupu: https:. uk. wikipedia. org. wiki. [in Ukrainian].
Donchenko O. Vstup do “arkhetypovoho menedzhmentu” . Olena Donchenko . Psykholohiia osobystosti. 2012. № 1 (3). S. 195-203. [in Ukrainian].
Zhenzhera S. V. Mozhlyvosti vyznachennia naukovoho statusu sotsialnykh modelei v mezhakh kontseptsii teoretychnoho znannia V. S. Stopina [Elektronnyi resurs] . S. V. Zhenzhera. Rezhym dostupu: file:. D:. Downloads. gums_2012_15_33. pdf [in Ukrainian].
Kisenko O. O. Sutnist ta struktura psykholohichnoi kultury sotsialnoho pratsivnyka [Elektronnyi resurs] . O. O. Kisenko. Rezhym dostupu: http:. www. sworld. com. ua. konfer30. 63. pdf [in Ukrainian].
Krymskyi S. B. Rankovi rozdumy : zb. st. . S. B. Krymskyi. K. : Maisternia Biletskykh, 2009. 120 s. [in Ukrainian].
Lakatosh I. Istoriia nauky ta yii ratsionalni rekonstruktsii . Imre Lakatosh; [per. Z anhl. prof. A. V. Furmana] . Psykholohiia i suspilstvo. 2016. № 3. S. 13-23. [in Ukrainian].
Macumoto D. Psihologija i kul’tura . D. Macumoto. SPb. : prajm-EVROZNAK, 2002. 416s. [in Russian].
Onufriieva L. A. Psykholohichnyi aspekt stanovlennia profesiinoi kultury u maibutnikh fakhivtsiv sotsionomichnykh profesii [Elektronnyi resurs] . L. A. Onufriieva . Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu imeni H. S. Skovorody. Psykholohiia. 2013. Vyp. 46(1). S. 140-151. Rezhym dostupu: http:. nbuv. gov. ua. UJRN. VKhnpu_psykhol_2013_ 46(1)__19 [in Ukrainian].
Orban-Lembryk L. E. Peretyn kultury, osvity y vykhovannia: sotsialno-psykholohichna interpretatsiia . L. E. Orban-Lembryk . Zbirnyk naukovykh prats: filosofiia, sotsiolohiia, psykholohiia. Ivano-Frankivsk: VDV TsIT, 2006. Vyp. 11. Ch. I. S. 3-17. [in Ukrainian].
Popova T. Kulturno-istorychni kontseptsii i dydaktychni problemy proektuvannia zmistu suchasnoi pryrodnycho-naukovoi osvity . T. Popova, A. Pavlenko . Vytoky pedahohichnoi maisternosti. 2012. Vyp. 9. S. 201-207. [in Ukrainian].
Psihologija i kul’tura . [pod red. D. Macumoto]. SPb. : Piter, 2003. 718s. [in Russian].
Revasevych I. Osoblyvosti vzaiemodii liudyny ta ekonomiky u predstavnykiv riznykh kultur . Iryna Revasevych . Psykholohiia i suspilstvo. 2005. №3. S. 39-52. [in Ukrainian].
Revasevych I. Psykhokulturna vzaiemodiia liudyny ta ekonomiky . Iryna Revasevych . Psykholohiia i suspilstvo. 2008. №3. S. 56-62. [in Ukrainian].
Revasevych I. Refleksyvne obgruntuvannia hlybynnoho smyslu psykhokulturnoho kodu ekonomiky . I. Revasevych . Psykholohiia i suspilstvo. 2015. № 4. S. 66-72. [in Ukrainian].
Romenets V. A. Istoriia psykholohii: XIX - pochatok XX stolittia: navch. posibn. . V. A. Romenets. K. : Lybid, 2007. 832 s. [in Ukrainian].
Slobodchikov V. I. Osnovy psihologicheskoj antropologii. Psihologija cheloveka : Vvedenie v psihologiju sub#ektivnosti : uch. posob. dlja vuzov . V. I. Slobodchikov, E. I. Isaev. M. : Shkola-Press, 1995. 384 s. [in Russian].
Sokoliuk A. Osobystisno-profesiinyi rozvytok maibutnoho fakhivtsia yak subiekta profesiinoho stanovlennia [Elektronnyi resurs] . A. Sokoliuk. Rezhym dostupu: http:. social-science. com. ua. article. 1267[in Ukrainian].
Tarasova T. Psykholohichna kultura osobystosti yak aktualnyi vyklyk sohodennia [Elektronnyi resurs] . T. Tarasova. Rezhym dostupu: http:. dspace. uabs. edu. ua. jspui. handle. 123456789. 12169[in Ukrainian].
Turianska V. E. Psykholohichna kultura yak chynnyk uspishnosti profesiinoi diialnosti maibutnoho inzhenera-pedahoha: avtoref. dys. na zdobuttia nauk. stupenia kand. psykhol. nauk : spets. 19. 00. 03 “Psykholohiia pratsi; inzhenerna psykholohiia” . V. E. Turianska. Kharkiv, 2009. 16 s. [in Ukrainian].
Furman A. A. Psykholohiia osobystosti : tsinnisno-oriientatsiinyi vymir : [monohrafiia] . Anatolii Anatoliiovych Furman. Odesa : ONPU; Ternopil : TNEU, 2016. 312 s. [in Ukrainian].
Furman A. V. Ideia profesiinoho metodolohuvannia : [monohrafiia] . Anatolii Vasylovych Furman. Yalta - Ternopil : Ekonomichna dumka, 2008. 205 s. [in Ukrainian].
Furman A. V. Katehorii vitakulturnoi metodolohii yak efektyvnyi zasib analizu i rozviazannia skladnykh problem . Anatolii V. Furman . Instytut eksperymentalnykh system osvity (naukovo-doslidnyi): Informatsiinyi biuleten. Vypusk 4. Ternopil: Ekonomichna dumka, 2004. S. 4-7. [in Ukrainian].
Furman A. V. Kontseptualno-zmistovi zasady ekonomiky osvity . A. V. Furman . Ekonomika osvity: Zbirka naukovykh prats NDTs “Ekonomika vyshchoi osvity” NDI Vyshchoi osvity APN Ukrainy. T. 1. Ternopil: Ekonomichna dumka, 2001. S. 11-19. [in Ukrainian].
Furman A. V. Prohrama avtorskoho kursu “Psykhokultura innovatsiinykh sotsiosystem” . A. V. Furman, I. Revasevych . Psykholohiia i suspilstvo. 2004. № 4. S. 221-235. [in Ukrainian].
Furman A. V. Psykhokultura ukrainskoi mentalnosti : [nauk. vyd. ] . Anatolii Vasylovych Furman. [2-e vyd. ] . Ternopil : NDI MEVO, 2011. 168 s. [in Ukrainian].
Furman A. V. Psykhokultura yak samoorhanizovana sfera aksiobuttia . Anatolii V. Furman, O. Morshchakova . Vitakulturnyi mlyn. 2013. Modul 15. S. 13-22. [in Ukrainian].
Furman A. V. Teoriia osvitnoi diialnosti yak metasystema . Anatolii Furman . Psykholohiia i suspilstvo. 2002. № 3-4. S. 20-58. [in Ukrainian].
Furman O. Ye. Psykholohichni parametry innovatsiino-psykholohichnoho klimatu zahalnoosvitnoho navchalnoho zakladu [ Tekst ] : 19. 00. 07 : dys. . d-ra psykhol. nauk [Elektronnyi resurs] . Oksana Yevstakhiivna Furman ; Ternopilskyi nats. un-t . Ternopil, 2015. 467 s. Rezhym dostupu: http:. dspace. tneu. edu. ua. handle. 316497. 1205[in Ukrainian].
Chaprak Ya. V. Psykholohichna kultura yak nevidiemnyi komponent profesionalizmu pedahoha [Elektronnyi resurs] . Ya. V. Chaprak, M. V. Chaprak. Rezhym dostupu: http:. www. nbuv. gov. ua. old_jrn. Soc_Gum. Vknukim_ped. 2009_21. 17. pdf[in Ukrainian].
Shvalb Yu. Svidomist yak vidnoshennia liudyny do svitu . Yu. Shvalb . Psykholohiia i suspilstvo. 2004. № 4. S. 154-166. [in Ukrainian].
Shhedrovickij G. P. Izbrannye trudy . G. P. Shhedrovickij. M. : Shk. kul’t. politiki, 1995. 760 s. [in Russian].
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
1. PROPOSED POLICY FOR JOURNALS THAT OFFER OPEN ACCESS
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
2. PROPOSED POLICY FOR JOURNALS THAT OFFER DELAYED OPEN ACCESS
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work [SPECIFY PERIOD OF TIME] after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).