Optimization of psychologists’ professional responsibility formation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35774/pis2024.02.201

Keywords:

responsibility, psychologists, personality

Abstract

The article substantiates the formulation of recommendations for optimizing the development of professional responsibility among modern university’s students-psychologists; it is highlighted that the essence of optimization is to choose the best option or method of action-deed out of a set of possible directions or versions from the standpoint of the best circumstances and the least used resources, the time spent and the efforts made; basic principles and rules for strengthening the components of the future psychologists’ professional responsibility are proposed; it has been analyzed the signs-characteristics of irresponsible behavior in order for each of them not to get into the nets of personal degradation; psychological steps that the successor must take in order to cultivate responsibility as a personal trait-quality are outlined; an ethical alphabet of professional responsibility is suggested, which includes prescriptions, recommendations, according to which a person can act as a specialist in his business; it is described that the psychologist’s professional responsibility is his basic (fundamental) socio-psychological property or characteristic as a competent specialist, which is produced (formed) by him during professional activity.

Author Biography

  • Arsen Lypka

    Doctor of Philosophy in Psychology, lecturer at the Psychology and Social Work Department of West Ukrainian National University, Ternopil.

    a.lypka@wunu.edu.ua

    ORCID: 0000-0002-1981-4675

References

Lypka A.O. (2024). Psykholohichna dynamika rozvytku profesiynoyi vidpovidalnosti maybutnikh psykholohiv [Psychological dynamics of the future psychologists' professional responsibility development]: dys. … doktora filosofiyi zi spetsialnosti 053 Psykholohiya, Ternopil. 232 s [in Ukrainian].

Lypka A. (2019). Psykholohichni porady ta rekomendatsiyi shchodo aktyvizatsiyi profesiynoyi vidpovidalnosti psykholohiv [Psychological advice and recommendations on the activation of the psychologists' professional responsibility]. Psykholohiya i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 2, 139-146 [in Ukrainian]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35774/pis2019.02.139

https://doi.org/10.35774/pis2019.02.139

Furman A.V. (2013). Paradyhma yak predmet metodolohichnoyi refleksiyi [Paradigm as a subject of methodological reflection]. Psykholohiya i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 3, 72-85 [in Ukrainian].

Furman O.Ye. (2015). Hromadyanska vidpovidalnist osobystosti yak predmet psykholohichnoho doslidzhennya [Civil responsibility of personality as a subject of psychological research]. Psykholohiya i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 1, 65-91 [in Ukrainian].

Furman. O.Ye. (2023). Prostir i chas u filosofsko-psykholohichnomu dyskursi [Space and time in philosophical and psychological discourse]. Systema suchasnykh metodolohiy: khrestomatiya u 4-kh tomakh/ uporyad., vidp. red., perekl. AV. Furman. Ternopil: ZUNU. T.5 (dodatkovyy). S. 495-542 [in Ukrainian].

Downloads

Published

2024-12-11

How to Cite

Lypka, Arsen. “Optimization of psychologists’ Professional Responsibility Formation”. Psyhology & Society, vol. 90, no. 2, Dec. 2024, pp. 201-1, https://doi.org/10.35774/pis2024.02.201.