Architectonics of activity theory: reflexive-deed scenario of metamethodologization

Anatoliy V. Furman


Interdisciplinary research is devoted to the reflexive-deed reconstruction of the methodological theory of activity, created by G.P. Shchedrovitsky (1929 – 1994) in the frameworks of the collective thinking activity of the Moscow Methodological Circle representatives half a century ago as a complex organization of ontological representations, categorical means, integration-active capabilities and schematizations of methodological thinking, concentrated in the step-by-step formation of ever-growing methodological reflection. With the help of the author’s constructed metamethodological optics this theory is substantiated in its ontological, architectonical, epistemological and philosophic-methodological aspects, highlighted in the polysystemic architectonic mosaic of its ideas and themes, concepts and conceptions, foundations and principles, ideas and constructs, notions and categories, thought-schemes and models, matrices and paradigms, and the most importantly – in conscious thought-actional operation it can appear as a perfect system-actional approach, which is a harbinger of the latest methodology as an original organism or a unique field of TA (thought activity). The essential horizon of such a methodology primarily orients the thinker not on scientific-subject ideas, pictures and knowledge, but on the transformation and development of means, methods and structures of interpenetrating thinking and activity, ie on their reflection in the central link – methodological organization of thinking. Significantly enriching the normative (particularly, sign-symbolic) space of culture, the world of methodology is constructed as one of a kind, original and unique, layer or dimension of human existence – enabling thought-activity, thought-action, professional methodologization. Considering the subject field of the current research, firstly, reflection is highlighted as an attributive center of methodological thinking and methodology in general, secondly, the stages of development of methodological reflection as components of an action are analyzed, thirdly, it has been created for the first time the matrix of genesis of the indicated reflection as an act of methodology creation, fourthly, it has been revealed the method of constructing metamethodological optics of detailed study of the activity theory on the material of the reinterpreted reflexive-deed scenario of the inspirer’s action of system-actional methodology.  In the author’s version of composing, metamethodological optics is a complex mechanism for selecting and specifying lenses-modules of interdependent thinking, understanding, activity, reflection, organized by the quintet scheme of philosophical categories as the basis for distinguishing systemic reflexive knowledge: the role of u n i- v e r s a l is performed by the vitacultural methodology developed by us, the place of g e n e r a l is occupied by a sphere of professional methodologization advocated by us, the position of s p e c i a l is occupied by a cyclic-deed approach that we have proposed, the position of i n i v i d u a l is taken by the author’s scheme-model of thought-deed, the place of s p e c i f i c is occupied by such a minimal fractal integrity of a special, conceptually diverse, idea of an object, which finds a graphic expression in the form of a thought scheme (a square wrapped in a circle) and four or five categorical definitions of this object. The main part of the study is devoted to a comprehensive content filling of each of the five reasoned stages of the methodological reflection becoming as components of full-fledged deed: propaedeutic stage – p r e – s i t u a t i o n, the quintessence of which is the idea of actional approach and methodological organization of thinking, the first stage – s i t u a t i o n, the core of which forms the construction of ontological schemes of activity and organization of the process of its reproduction, the second stage – m o t i v a t i-      o n, where the most important acts are reflexive immersion of thinking into the world of activity and the emergence of ontology of thought-activity, the third stage – d e e d  a c t i o n  the main essence of which is reduced to reflexive immersion of TA ontology into a substantial horizon of thinking and to a compliance with the requirements of the multiple knowledge principle, the fourth stage – a f t e r a c t i o n, the most important in which is the reflexive closure of methodological thinking through various reflexive identifications. Thus, the thematically and substantively detailed horizontal of the newly created matrix of the methodological reflection genesis, which is the essence of self-thoughtful – philosophical and therefore methodological – thinking and alpha and omega of methodology in general. At the same time, among the most significant step-by-step creative products of the author’s performance it is worth noting: a) the concept of metamethodologization, that enabled the creation of the latest metamethodological optics of scrupulous elaboration of the activity theory according to the logic of a deed scenarioing of a creative way of the STA-methodology’s founder; b) the thought-scheme of component-tacts of the methodological turn of thinking as a reflexive-canonical deed; c) the cyclic-deed reconstruction of the method of systemic analysis in the unity of different procedures and stages of its implementation; d) the four-stage scheme of the evolution of a scientific subject in two orthogonal dichotomous dimensions of the implementation of methodological work: “empirical (sensory) – logical” and “specific – abstract”; e) the abstract ontological scheme of activity as a full-fledged deed of its reproduction in the cyclical complementarity of ontologems of situation, actualization, translation and reflexive practice and in the context of vitaculture; f) the biquater organizations of the corpus of epistemological units (idea, ontology, universum, STA-approach and scheme, category, theory, STA-methodology) in the polysystem substantiation of thought-actional representations; g) the thought-schemes of connection of ontogenetic stages of reflexive-deed closure of methodological thinking with different reflexive identifications, etc. As a result of the study conducted it is concluded that the model of reflexive-scenario looping of methodology, gained for the first time, for today is a holistic ontological picture of methodological TA, and in the long run – of the universe of thought-activity and thought-deed in general. A clear confirmation of this yet is the unique step-by-step spectrum of competent methodological practice – from the creation, development and usage of various technologies of methodological work and reflective metamethodologization to canon-oriented methodological seminars and sessions, organization-actional and organization-deed games.

Ключові слова

theory of activity; system-actional approach; methodology; methodological thinking; principle of cultural conformity; reflection; methodological reflection; metamethodological

Повний текст:



Miasoid, P. A. & Shatyrko, L. O. (Eds.). (2016). Akademik V. A. Romenets: tvorchist i pratsi [Akademiс V. A. Romenets: creativity and work]. Kyiv: Lybid [in Ukrainian].

Bakhtin, M. (2019). Do filosofii vchynku [To the philosophy of action]. Psykholohiya i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 1, 5-34 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A. V. & Furman, O. I. & Shandruk, S. K. & Co (Eds.). (2019). Vitakulturna metodolohiia: antolohiia. Do 25-richchia naukovoi shkoly profesora A.V. Furmana [Viticultural methodology: an anthology. To the 25th anniversary of professor A.V. Furman's Scientific School]. Ternopil: TNEU [in Ukrainian].

Shchedrovitskiy, P. H. & Danylova, V. L. (Eds.). (2010). Georgiy Petrovich Shchedrovitskiy. Moscow: ROSSPEN [in Russian].

Hirniak, A.N. (2020). Phychology modular-developmental interaction process: monografiia. Ternopol [in Ukrainian].

Hirniak, A.N., Hirniak, G.S. (2020). Metodolohichne obhruntuvannya psykholohichnykh zminnykh empirychnoho doslidzhennya efektyvnosti modulno-rozvyval'noyi vzayemodiyi [Methodological justication psychological variables empirical research efficiency modular developmental inmepaktion]. Psykholohiya I suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 2, 177-191 [in Ukrainian].

Hirniak, A.N. (2021). Phychological fundamentals of participants modular-developmental interaction process in the educational establichments: Thess for a doctors degree in Phychology: 19.00.07. Ivano-Frankivsk [in Ukrainian].

Huseltseva, M. (2020). Merezhevyi pliuralizm u psykholohii: perspektyvy polimetodolohii i transdystsyplinarnosti [Network pluralism in psychology: prospects for the field of methodology and transdisciplinarity]. Psykho­lohiya i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 2, 43-60 [in Ukrainian].

Huseltseva M.S. (2017). Metodolohichna optyka yak instrument piznannia [Methodological optics as a tool of cognition]. Psykholohiya i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 4, 39-55 [in Ukrainian].

Gusserl, E. Kartezianski medytatsii. Vstup do fenomenolohii / per. z nim. Kyiv: Tempora, 2 021. 304 s. [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A.V., Biskup, V.S., Morschakova, O.S. (comp.) (2020). Zahalna sotsiolohiya [General sociology]. Kyiv: Lira-K [in Ukrainian].

Zinov'yev, A.A. (2002). Zkhodzhennya vid abstraktnoho do konkretnoho (na materiali "Kapitalu" K. Marksa) [Ascent from the a abstract to the concrete (on the material of K. Marx's "Kapital")]. Moskov: Instytut filosofiyi RAN [in Russian].

Kant, I. (2001). Krytyka chystoho rozumu [Critique of pure reason]. (Trans. from german). Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Kotlyarevskyy I. (1968). Eneyida [Aeneid]. Kyiv: VKhL "Dnipro" [in Ukrainian].

Mamardaschvili, M.K. (1992). Yak ya rozumiyu filosofiyu [As i understand philosophy]. Moskov: Uzd. gryppa "Progress", "Kultura" [in Russian].

Furman, A.V. & Furman, O.I. & Shandruk, S.K. & Co (2019). Metodolohiia i psykholohiia humanitarnoho piznannia. Do 25-richchia naukovoi shkoly profesora A. V. Furmana [Methodology and psychology of humanitarian cognition. To the 25th anniversary of professor A. V. Furman's scientific school]. Ternopil: TNEU [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A.V. (gol. red.) (2002). Modulno-rozvyvalna systema yak sotsiokul'turni orhanizatsiya [Modular and developmental system as socio-cultural organization]. Psykholohiya i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 3-4, 12-92 [in Ukrainian].

Miasoid, P.A. (2009). Metateoretychnyy analiz u psykholohiyi [Metatheoretical analysis in psychology]. Psykholohiya i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 4, 54-82 [in Ukrainian].

Miasoid, P. (2019). Pryntsyp istoryzmu i myslennia u psykholohii [The principle of historicism and thinking in psychology]. Psykholohiya i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 34, 38-72 [in Ukrainian].

Miasoid P.A. (2016). Psykholohichne piznannia: istoriia, lohika, psykholohiia [Psychological cognition: history, logic, psychology]. Kyiv: Lybid [in Ukrainian].

Kyrychuk, O.V. & Romenets, V.A. (Eds.). (2006). Osnovy psykholohii [Fundamentals of psychology]. Kyiv: Lybid [in Ukrainian].

Myasoid, P.A. & Furman, A.V. (Eds.). (2012). Psykholohiia vchynku: Shliakhamy tvorchosti V.A. Romentsia [Psychology act: the way of creativity, of Romenets V.A.]. Kyiv: Lybid [in Ukrainian].

Pasichnuk, I.D. (2015). Psykholohiia myslennia [Psykhology thinking ]. Ostrog [in Ukrainian].

Reus, A.G. & Zinchenko, A.P. (2003). Putevoditel po metodologii Organizatsii, Rukovodstva i Upravleniya: hrestomatiya po rabotam G. P. Schedrovitskogo [A guide to the methodology of Organization, Leadership and Management: a reader on the work of G.P. Shchedro­vitsky]. Moscow: Delo [in Russian].

Putevoditel po osnovnyim ponyatiyam i shemam metodologii organizatsii, rukovodstva i upravleniya: hrestomatiya po rabotam G. P. Schedrovitskogo [A guide to the basic concepts and schemes of the methodology of Organization, Leadership and Management: a reader on the works of G.P. Shchedrovitsky]. (2004). Moscow: Delo [in Russian].

Revasewich, I.S. (2017). Predmetne pole psykhokul'tury: ratsional'na rekonstruktsiya teoretychnukh uyavlen [Subject field of psychoculture: rational reconstruction theoretical igeas]. Psykholohiya i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 1, 50-61 [in Ukrainian].

Romenets, V.A. (2007). Іstorіya psikhologіi ХIХ - pochanku ХХ stolіttia [History of Psychology XIX - early XX century]. Kyiv: Lybіd [in Ukrainian].

Romenets, V.A. & Manokha, P.I. (2017). Istoriia psykholohii XX stolittia [History of psychology of the twentieth century]. Kyiv: Lybid [in Ukrainian].

Romenets, V.A. (2013). Predmet i pryntsypy istoryko-psykholohichnoho doslidzhennia [Subject and principles of historical and psychological research]. Psykholohiya i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 2, 6-27 [in Ukrainian].

Sabaduha, V.O. (2019). Metafizyka syspil'noho ta osobystisnoho buttya [Metaphysics of the social and personal existence]. Ivano-Frankivs'k [in Ukrainian].

Savchun, M.V. (2013). Metodolohemy psykholohiyi [Methodologists of psychogy]. Kyiv: Akademvudav [in Ukrainian].

Samoyilov, O.E. (2020). Dialogika idea jak zasobu myslennia [Dialogics of idea form-kreation as a means of thinking]. Psykholohiya i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 3, 5-32 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A.V. (Ed.). (2015). Systema suchasnykh metodolohii: khrestomatiia u 4-kh tomakh [The system of modern methodologies: a textbook in 4 volumes]. Ternopil: TNEU [in Ukrainian].

Sossur F. de. (1998). Kurs zahalnoi lingwistyky [General linguistics course]. Kyiv: Osnovy [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A.A. (2019). Intencijinist yak sytnisna oznaka smyslozhyttievoho byttia osobystosti [Intentionality as an essential feature of the personality's meaning-life existence]. Psykholohiya i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 3-4, 118-137 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A.A. (2020). Metodolohiia psykholohichnoho piznannia smyslozhyttievoi sfery osobystosti [Methodology of psychological knowledge of the sense of life sphere of personality]. Psykholohiya i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 1, 5-34 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A.A. (2016). Psykholohiia osobystosti: tsinnisno-oriientatsiinyi vymir [Personality psychology: value-orientation dimension]. Odesa: ONPU; Ternopil: TNEU [in Ukrainian]

Furman, A.A. (2017). Psykholohiia smylozhyt­tievoho rozvytku osobystosti [Psychology of the meaning-life personality development]. Ternopil: TNEU [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A.V. (2021). Avtorska programa dyscypliny "Psykholohia yak sfera myslediialnosti" [Author's program of the discipline "Psychology as a sphere of thinking activity"]. Psykholohiya i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 1, 160-185 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A.V. (2006). Vstup do teorii osvitnoi diialnosti [Introduction to the theory of educational activity]. Ternopil: Instytut ESO [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A. V. (2013). Geneza nauky yak hlobalna doslidnytska prohrama: tsyklichno-vchynkova perspektyva [Genesis of science as a global research program: cyclical-action perspective]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 4, 18-36 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A.V., Hirniak, A.N., Hirniak ,G.S. (2016). Gromadskyi monitoring roboty suddiv Ternopilschny [Public monitoring of the courts work of Ternopil region]. Psykholohiya i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 3, 122-128 [in Ukrainian].

a. Furman, A.V., Dovhan, A.O. (2019). Onovlena svitogliadna mapa buttia, osmuslenoho v suspilnomy ta osobustisnomy vumirach [An updated outlook map of being, understood in social and personal dimensions]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 3-4, 148-157 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A.V. (2016). Ideia i zmist profesiinoho metodolohuvannia [The idea and content of professional methodology]. Ternopil: TNEU [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A.V. (2020). Katehoriina matrytsia teoretychnoi psykholohii [Categorical matrix of theoretical psychology]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 2, 13-51 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A.V. & Kovalova, T. (2011). Katehoriina matrytsia vzaiemozviazku obraziv subiektyvnoi realnosti i psykholohichnykh chynnykiv samo aktualizatsii dorosloho [Categorical matrix of the relationship of images of subjective reality and psychological factors of self-actualization of the adult]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 4, 72-81 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A.V. (2018). Metateoretychna mozaika zhyttia svidomosti [Metatheoretical mosaic of the life of consciousness]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 34, 13-50 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A.V. (2018). Metateoretychni kontsepty piznannia svidomosti [Metatheoretical concepts of cognition of consciousness.]. Psykholohiia osobystosti - Personality psychology, 1 (9), 5-11 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A.V. (2017). Metodolohichna optyka tsyklichno-vchynkovoi orhanizatsii teorii yak systemy orhanizatsii ratsionalnoho znannia [Methodological optics of cyclic-action organization of theory as a system of organization of rational knowledge]. Vitakulturnyi mlyn - Viticultural mill, 19, 4-15 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A.V. (2021). Metateoretychna rekonst­ruktsiia systemomuslediialnisnyi pidkhid do rosuminnia svidomosti [Methodological reconstruction of system-thought-activity approach to consciousness understanding]. Psykholohiia osobystosti - Per­sonality psychology, №1(10), 5-35 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A.V. (2013). Metodolohiia paradyhmalnykh doslidzhen u sotsialnii psykholohii [Methodology of paradigmatic research in social psychology]. Kyiv; Ternopil: TNEU [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A.V. (2016). Metodolog - profesiia majbutn'ogo [Methodologist - profession of the future]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 1, 16-42 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A.V. (2005). Modulno-rozvyvalna orhanizatsiia myslediialnosti - skhema profesiinoho metodolohuvannia [Modular and developmental organiza­tion of thinking - a scheme of professional methodology]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 4, 40-69 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A.V. (2017). Modulno-rozvyvalnyi orhprostir metodolohuvannia: arhumenty rozshyrennia [Modular-developmental organizational space of methodology: arguments of expansion]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 1, 34-49 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A.V. (1997). Modulno-rozvyvalne navchannia: pryntsypy, umovy, zabezpechennia [Modular and developmental education: principles, conditions, provision]. Kyiv: Pravda Iaroslavychiv [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A.V., Morschakova, O.S. (2015). Socialna kultura [Social culture]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 1, 26-36 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A.V. (sziens. konsylt.-red.) (20052021). Vitakulturniy mlyn - Vitacultural mill. Moduli 122 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A.V. (2009). Osvitni stsenariyi: sutnist', kompozytsiya, pryntsypy stvorennya [Essence composition principles of creation]. Psykholohiya i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 3, 174-192 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A.V. (2009). Osvitni stsenariyi u systemi modulno-rozvyvalnoho navchannya [Essence composition of system modular development teaching]. Ternopil: NDI MEVO [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A.V. (2013). Paradyhma yak predmet metodolohichnoi refleksii [Paradigm as a subject of methodological reflection]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 3, 72-85 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A.V. (2011). Psykhokultura ukrainskoi mentalnosti [Psychoculture of the Ukrainian mentality]. Ternopil: Ekonomichna dumka [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A.V. (2017). Svidomist yak ramkova umova piznannia i metodolohuvannia [Consciousness as a framework condition for cognition and methodology]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 4, 16-38 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A.V. (2015). Svit metodolohii [The world of methodology]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 2, 4760 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A.V. (2021). Suchasni tendentsiyi rozvytku sfery phycolohii v optytsi vitakul'turnoi metogolohiyi [Current trends spnere development of optics and cultural methodology]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 1, 6-15 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A.V. (2014). Teoretychna model' hry yak uchynennya [Theoretical model of the game as an act]. Nauka i osvita. Psykholohiya. - Sciense and education. Psychology, 5/CXXII, 95104 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A.V. (2020). Teoretychna model osobystisnoho pryynyattya lyudyny lyudynoyu [Theoretical model of the personal acceptance man man]. Psykholohiya i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 1, 56-77 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A.V. (2006). Typolohichnyi pidkhid u systemi profesiinoho metodolohuvannia [Typological approach in the system of professional methodology]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 2, 78-92 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A.V., Furman O.Ye. (2021). Metodolohichne obhruntuvannya psylholohii yak sfery myslediyal'nosti [Methodologicak justication psychology as areas of thought]. Psykholohiya osobystosti - Personality psychology, 2, 9-45 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A.V. & Shandruk, S.K. (2014). Orhanizatsiyno-diyalnisni ihry u vyshchiy shkoli [Organizational-activity games in high school]. Ternopil: TNEU [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A.V., Shandruk, S.K. (2014). Sutnist hry yak uchynennya [The essence of the game committing]. Ternopil: TNEU [in Ukrainian].

Furman, O.Ye., Hirniak, A.N. (2020).Sutnisne vyznachennia modulno-rozvyvalnoi vzayemodiyi vykladacha i studentiv v osvitn'omu protsesi [The essential definitions of modular developmental interaction of teacher and students the educational process]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 3, 53-81 [in Ukrainian].

Furman (Gumenyuk), O.I. (2012). Metodologiya piznannya osvitnogo vchynku v konteksti innovacijno-psychologichnogo klimatu. [Methology cognition of educational act in the context innovation and psycholohi climate]. Psychologia i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 1, 47-48 [in Ukrainian].

Furman (Humeniuk), O.I. (1998). Modulno-rozvyvalna systema: model psykholohichnoho zrostannia vchytelia i uchnia [Modular development system: a model of psychological growth of teacher and student]. Osvita i upravlinnia - Management and education. Vol. 2. Issue 2, 75-81 [in Ukrainian].

Furman (Humeniuk), O.I. (2008). Teoriia i metodolohiia innovatsiino-psykholohichnoho klimatu zahalnoosvitnoho zakladu [Theory and methodology of innovation-psychological climate of the general educational institution]. Yalta-Ternopil: Pidruchnyky i posibnyky [in Ukrainian].

Furman, O.I., Didora, M.I., Khrystyniuk, U.I. (2022). Social'ni normy yak psykhoculturnyi faktoe zhyttyeaiyal'nosti osobystosti [Social norms as a psychocultural factor vital activity of the individual]. Psykholohiya i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 1, 179-198 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, O.I., Furman, A.A., Dykyi, Ya.O. (2021). Vchynok i podia yak sociemna organizovanist' zhyttyevoho schlyakhy osobystosti [Act and event as a sociemis organization of the pirsonality's life path]. Psykholohiya i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 2, 143-168 [in Ukrainian].

Hairulin, O. (2021). Psyholohiya ihrovoho modeliuvannya socialnoho zhyttya subyekta: monografiya. Ternopil, 2021, 404 [in Ukrainian].

Shchedrovitsky, G.P. (2022).'Zasadnuchi yiavlennia ta katehorijni zasoby teorii diial'nosti [Basic ideas and categorical means of activity theory]. Psykholohiya i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 1, 95-126 [in Ukrainian].

Shchedrovitsky, G.P. (2005). Znak i dejatelnost. [Sign and activity]. Kn. 1. Moskva [in Russian].

Shchedrovitsky, G.P. (2016). Znachennya i smysl [Meaning and signiticance]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 3, 24-45 [in Ukrainian].

Shchedrovitsky, G.P. (1995). Izbrannye trudy [Selected Works]; Piskoppel, A.A. & Shchedrovitskyi, L.P. (Eds.) Moscow: Shk. kult. politiki [in Russian].

Shchedrovitsky, G.P. (2004). Metodolohichna orhanizatsiia systemno-strukturnyh doslidzhen' i rozrobok [Methodological organization systemno-strukturnyh research and development]. Psykholohiya i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 2, 30-49 [in Ukrainian].

Shchedrovitsky, G.P. (2000). Metodolohichna orhanizatsiia sfery psykholohii [Metodological organization sphere of psychology]. Psykholohiya i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 2, 7-49 [in Ukrainian].

Shchedrovitsky, G. (2013). Metodolohichne znachennia opozytsii naturalistychnoho i systemodiialnisnoho pidkhodiv [Methodological significance of the opposition of naturalistic and systemic approaches]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 1, 40-47 [in Ukrainian].

a. Shchedrovitsky, G.P. (2005). Myslennya. Rozuminnya. Refleksiya [Thinking. Understanding. Reflection]. Moscow: Nauka [in Russian].

Shchedrovitsky, G. (2006). Orhanizatsiino-diialnisna hra yak nova forma orhanizatsii ta metod rozvytku kolektyvnoi myslediialnosti [Organizational-activity game as a new form of organization and method of development of collective thinking]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 3, 5869 [in Ukrainian].

Shchedrovitsky, G.P. (2004). Organizatsionno-deyatelnostnaya igra: Sbornik tekstov (2). Iz arhiva G.P. Schedrovitskogo [Organizational-activity game: Collection of texts (2). From the archive of G.P. Shchedrovitsky]. Vol. 9. Moscow: Nasledie MMK [in Russian].

Shchedrovitsky, G.P. (2003). Orhanizatsiia. Rukovodstvo. Upravlennya [Organization. Management. Guide]. Vyp. 1. Moskov: Put' [in Russian].

Shchedrovitsky, G.P. (1996). Ontolohichni osnovy programmy issledovaniya myslitel'noi deyatel'nosti po rescheniju zadach i problem [Ontological foundations programs research mental activity to solve problems]. Voprosy metodolohii - Guestions of methodology, 3, 18-43.

Shchedrovitsky, G.P. (2021). Psykholohiia i metodologiia: perspektyvy spivorhanizatsiyi [Psychology and methodology: prospects of co-organization]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 2, 122-142 [in Ukrainian].

Shchedrovitsky, G.P. (2015). Syntez znan: problemy i metody [Synthesis of knowledge: problems and methods]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 2, 61-83 [in Ukrainian].

Shchedrovitsky, G.P. (2005). Skhema myslediialnosti - systemno-strukturna budova, znachennia i zmist [The scheme of mentality - the system-structural structure, meaning and content]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 4, 29-39 [in Ukrainian].

Shchedrovitsky, G.P. (1997). Filosofiya. Nauka. Metodologiya [Philosophy. Science. Methodology]. Moskcow [in Russian].

Yakovenko, Yu.I. (2022). Metodolohichna travma v sotsiohumanitarnykh naukakh [Methodological trauma in the cocio-humanitarian sciences]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 1, 127-148 [in Ukrainian].

Yakovenko, Yu.I. (2022). Stan korporatyvnoi cul'tury sociolohiv yak peredumova zmistovoho rozvytku dyschypliny [The state of corporate culture of sociologists as a prereguisite for the substantive development of the discipline]. Habitus, 33, 34-40 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A.V. (2016). Volodymyr Rovenets as the architect of the methodology of humanitarian cognition. Psykholohiya i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 2, 10-24 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, O. І. (2015). The innovative psychological climate: its scope, structure and parameters. Problems of Psychology in the 21 st. Century, Vol. 9, 1, 14-19 [in English].



  • Поки немає зовнішніх посилань.

ISSN 2523-4099 (online), ISSN 1810-2131 (print)