The phenomenon of artistic detail: the methodological dimensions of cognition
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35774/pis2017.03.007Keywords:
creativity, literature, poetics, artistic work, methodologization, phenomenon of artistic detail, artistic generalization, microimage, detail, analytical detailingAbstract
Logical concept of artistic detail as a system-forming phenomenon of any creative thinking, ranging from scientific, rationally oriented and completing poetic, spontaneously existential. The reflexive trajectory of the research way of the artistic detail covers the following topics: the place and role of analytical detailing in the development of literature, the detail of the artistic work as a subject of study, the typology of artistic details, the levels and peculiarities of their functioning in the perception of the work by the reader, the artistic detail as a means of figurative perception of reality in the work of Mykhailo Kotsubynskyi, the importance of detail in revealing the psychological peculiarities of the character of the heroes, the compositional function of artistic details, and others. The epic core of methodologization is the novels of the talented master of the Ukrainian word Mykhailo Mykhailovych Kotsubynskyi (1864-1913) and, in its context, the evolution of detail in his work as a means of artistic generalization. Logically argumented choice of the objective space of scientific think activity is caused by several moments that in the complementary form a subject field of given study: first, the special attention of the writer to the inner world of man, to the subtle movements of her soul; second, constant search for adequate artistic forms for this and, thirdly, the peculiarity of his creative manner. It is proved that accurate study of the novels of M. Kotsubynskyi gives a holistic representation of both the essential mosaic of artistic detail and the peculiarity of the skill of the image of details in his work in general.
References
Asafjev B.V. Muzykalnaja forma kak procjess. L., 1971 [In Russian].
Balashova T.V. Kontjext istorichjeskij i kontjext litjeraturnyj (O sovrjemjennoj francuzskoj kritikje). Mjetodologija sovrjemjennogo litjeraturovjedjenija: Probljemy istorizma. M., 1978 [In Russian].
Barhin M.G. Arhitjektura. osnova sintjezirovanija srjedy goroda. Vzaimodjejstvije i sintjez iskusstv. L., 1978 [In Russian].
Bjezklubjenko S.D. Poetika iskusstva kak tjehnologija tvorchjestva. Poetika iskusstva kak logika hudozhjestvjennogo poznanija. Bjezklubjenko S.D. Grani tvorchjeskogo mjetoda. K., 1986 [In Russian].
Blaubjerg I.V. Probljema cjelostnosti v marxistskoj filosofii. M., 1963 [In Russian].
Bushmin A.S. Ob analitichjeskom rassmotrjenii hudozhjestvjennogo proizvjedjenija. Analiz litjeraturnogo proizvjedjenija. L., 1976 [In Russian].
Vvjedjenije v litjeraturovjedjenije. Pod rjed. G.N. Pospjelova. M., 1976 [In Russian].
Vvjedjenije v litjeraturovjedjenije. Pod rjed. G.N. Pospjelova. 2-je izd., dop. M., 1983 [In Russian].
Vinokurov Е. Ostajetsja v silje: O klassikje i sovrjemjennosti. M., 1979 [In Russian].
Galanov V.Е. Zhivopis slovom: Portrjet. Pjejzazh. Vjesch. M., 1974 [In Russian].
Gjej N.K. Izobrazhjenije i vyrazhjenije. Hudozhjestvjennost litjeratury: Poetika. Stil. M., 1975 [In Russian].
Gjej N.K. Poetichjeskoje slovo. Slovo-znak. slovo-obraz. Hudozhjestvjennost litjeratury: Poetika. Stil. M., 1975 [In Russian].
Ginzburg L. Litjeratura v poiskah rjealnosti. Voprosy litjeratury. 1986. № 2 [In Russian].
Goncharov B.P. Mikroobraz i kompljex mikroobrazov. Goncharov B.P. Poetika Majakovskogo: Lirichjeskij gjeroj posljeoktjabrskoj poezii i puti jego hudozhjestvjennogo utvjerzhdjenija. M., 1983 [In Russian].
Goranov K.O njekotoryh storonah hudozhjestvjennogo obraza. Voprosy filosofii. 1966. № 4 [In Russian].
Gorin V. І. Hudozhnja detal jak mіkroobraz lіtjeraturnogo tvoru. Ukrainskje lіtjeraturoznavstvo. Lvіv, 1969 [In Ukrainian].
Djelakrua E. Mysli ob iskusstvje, o znamjenityh hudozhnikah. M., 1960 [In Russian].
Dal V. Tolkovyj slovar zhivogo vjelikorusskogo jazyka. M., 1955. T. 1 [In Russian].
Dobin Е. Djetal u Chjehova kak stjerzhjen kompozicii. Voprosy litjeratury. 1975. № 8 [In Russian].
Еjzjenshtjejn S. Еstjetyka kіnomistectva: Doslіdzhjennja. Stattі. Lekcіyi. K., 1978 [In Ukrainian].
Zhabickaja L.G. Vosprijatije hudozhjestvjennoj litjeratury i lichnost. Litjeraturnoje razvitije v junosti. Kishinjev, 1974. S. 37-61 [In Russian].
Ibrajev L.Ja. Slovo i obraz: K probljemje sootnoshjenija lingvistiki i poetiki. Filologichjeskije nauki. 1981. №1 [In Russian].
Іvanchjenko R.G. Lіtjeraturne rjedaguvannja. K.,1983 [In Ukrainian].
Ioganson B. V. Za mastjerstvo v zhivopisi. M., 1952 [In Russian].
Kaljenichjenko N.L. Vjelikij soncjepoklonnik: Zhittja і tvorchіst Mihajla Kocjubinskogo. K., 1967 [In Ukrainian].
Kaplun A.I. Stil i arhitjektura. M., 1985 [In Russian].
Kopnin P.V. Idjeja kak forma myshljenija.- K., 1963 [In Russian].
Koptіlov V. Detal і cіle v hudozhnomu perekladі. Koptіlov V. Pershotvіr і pereklad. K., 1972 [In Ukrainian].
Koh І.K. Osnovy scenіchnogo ruhu. K., 1966 [In Ukrainian].
Kuznjecov Ju.B. Djetal kak srjedstvo hudozhjestvjennogo obschjenija v novjellah M.M. Kocjubinskogo: diss. na soisk. nauchnoj stjepjeni kand. filologichjeskih nauk: 10.01.08, 10.01.03. Jurij Borisovich Kuznjecov. Kijev, 1984. 198 s. [In Russian].
Kuznjecov Ju. Djetal hudozhnja. Jurіj Kuznjecov: Rjezhim dostupu: http://www.shevchcycl.riev.ua/ statt-prolteraturnu-ta-malyarsku-yvorchst/105-detal.html [In Ukrainian].
Kuznjecov Ju.B. Еstjetika іmprjesіonіzmu (zhivopis і lіtjeratura). K., 2003[In Ukrainian].
Kuznjecov Ju.B. Іmprjesіonіzm v ukrainskіj prozі kіncja XІX. pochatku XX st. (probljemi jestjetiki і pojetiki) : avtoref. dys.. d-ra filol. nauk: 10.01.01 ; 10.01.06. Yu.B. Kuznetsov ; NAN Ukrainy. In-t l-ry im. T.H.Shevchenka. K., 2004. 40 s.[In Ukrainian].
Kuznjecov Ju.B. Poetyka Myhajla Kocubynskogo. K., 1989 [In Ukrainian].
Kuznjecov Ju.B. Slіdami fei Morgany: vyvchjennja tvorchostі Kocubinskogo v shkolі. K., 1989 [In Ukrainian].
Kuznjecov Ju.B. Hudozhnja djetal jak prijom slovjesnogo zhivopisu u tvorah M. Kocjubinskogo. Ukrainska mova і lіteratura v shkolі. 1980. № 12 [In Ukrainian].
Losev A.F. Probljema simvola i rjealistichjeskoje iskusstvo. M., 1976 [In Russian].
Ljahov V.N. Iskusstvo knigi. M., 1978 [In Russian].
Mazepa V.І. Hudozhnja tvorchіst jak pіznannja. K., 1974 [In Ukrainian].
Mjejlah M.B. Zamjetki ob izobrazitjelnoj djetali. Razmyshljenija u ekrana. L., M., 1966 [In Russian].
Obschjestvo, litjeratura, chtjenije. Vosprijatije litjeratury v tjeorjetichjeskom aspjektje. M., 1978 [In Russian].
Paustovskij K. Zolotaja roza. M., 1972 [In Russian].
Paustovskij K. Sobranije sochinjenij: V 8 t. M., 1967. T. 3 [In Russian].
Platoshkina G.I. Principy zhivopisnoj kompozicii v romanje Ljeonida Ljeonova “Skutarjevskij”. Filologichjeskije nauki. 1980. № 1 [In Russian].
Poljakov M.Ja. Voprosy poetiki i hudozhjestvjennoj sjemantiki. M.,1978 [In Russian].
Primochina N. Djemon Bloka i djemon Vrubjelja (K probljemje sopostavitjelnogo analiza proizvjedjenij slovjesnogo i izobrazitjelnogo iskusstva). Voprosy litjeratury. 1986. № 4 [In Russian].
Prishvin M.M. Njezabudki. M., 1969 [In Russian].
Putnin F.V. Djetal hudozhjestvjennaja. KLE. M., 1978. T. 9. S. 267 [In Russian].
Slovnik lіtjeraturoznavchih tjermіnіv.- K., 1971 [In Ukrainian].
Solovjev S.M. Polivariantnyje obrazy. Solovjev S.M. Izobrazitjelnyje srjedstva v tvorchjestvje F.M. Dostojevskogo. M., 1979 [In Russian].
Spirkin A. G. Kurs marxistskoj filosofii. M., 1964 [In Russian].
Tolstoj L. N. Polnoje sobranije sochinjenij. M., 1937. T. 46, T. 52 [In Russian].
Tomashjevskij B.V. Pisatjel i kniga: Ochjerk tjextologii. M., 1959 [In Russian].
Farkashova Z. Dialjektika suschnosti i javljenija hudozhjestvjennom izobrazhjenii. Sushnost i javljenije. K., 1987 [In Russian].
Faschjenko V. Drіbnota faktіv і akcjentovana podrobicja. Vіtchizna. 1965. № 11 [In Ukrainian].
Filosofskij enciklopjedichjeskij slovar. M., 1983 [In Russian].
Franko І. Zіbrannja tvorіv: U 50 t. K., 1981. T. 31 [In Ukrainian].
Frolova K.P. Analіz hudozhnogo tvoru. K., 1975 [In Russian].
Furman A.V., Furman A.A. Hudozhnja djetal u tvorchіj jekzistjencіi Tarasa Shevchjenka. Anatolіj V. Furman, Anatolіj A. Furman. Taras Shevchjenko і suchasna nacіonalna osvіta: Materіaly Mіzhnar. n.-pr. konf., TNЕU, 5-6 bjerjeznja 2014 r. Psyhologіja і suspіlstvo. 2014. Spjecvipusk. S. 124-126 [In Ukrainian].
Furman A.V., Furman O.Y. Obraz dolі v pojetichnomu svіtі Tarasa Shevchjenka. Anatolіj V. Furman, Oxana Furman. Psyhologіja і suspіlstvo. 2014. №1. S. 16-25 [In Ukrainian].
Hudozhjestvjennaja kommunikacija i sjemiotika. Tjeorii, shkoly, koncjepcii (kritichjeskije analizy). M., 1986 [In Russian].
Chjernjakov A.A. Hudozhjestvjennaja djetal kak objekt estjetichjeskogo analiza: avtorjef. diss. .. kand. filos. nauk. M.: MGU, 1979. 15 s. [In Russian].
Chudakov A.P. Poetika Chjehova. M., 1971 [In Russian].
Chudakov A.P. Prjedmjetnij mir litjeratury (K probljemje katjegorij istorichjeskoj poetiki). Istorichjeskaja poetika: Itogi i pjerspjektivy. M., 1986 [In Russian].
Jacjenko M.T. Na rubjezhі lіtjeraturnih jepoh: “Еnjeida” Kotljarjevskogo і hudozhnіj progrjes v ukrainskіj lіtjeraturі. K., 1977 [In Ukrainian].
Culler J. Structuralist Poetics. Ithaca, 1978 [In English].
Jenciklopedia Likovnik Umjetnosti. Zagreb, 1972. T. 2 [In Croatian].
Heath S. Structuration of the Novel-Text. Signs of the Times. Granta; Cambridge, 1971 [In English].
Meyers J. Painting and the Novel. Manchester, 1975 [In English].
Santayana G. The Sens of Beauty. New York, 1961 [In English].
Shipley T. J. Dictionary of World Literary Terms. Boston, 1970 [In English].
Smith N.B. Mining for Details. Smith N.B. Speed Reeding Made Jeasy. New York, 1963 [In English].
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
1. PROPOSED POLICY FOR JOURNALS THAT OFFER OPEN ACCESS
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
2. PROPOSED POLICY FOR JOURNALS THAT OFFER DELAYED OPEN ACCESS
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work [SPECIFY PERIOD OF TIME] after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
