Personal world as an ontophenomenal reality (to the categorical analysis of Heorhiy Ball)

Authors

  • Anatoliy A. Furman Candidate of Psychological Sciences, Associate Professor, Senior Researcher, Research Institute of Methodology and Education of Ternopil National Economic University, Associate Professor of the Department of Social Work and Personnel Management of the Odessa National Polytechnic University, member of the editorial board of the journal Psychology and Society, Odesa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35774/pis2017.02.135

Keywords:

being, human existence, psychosophian approach, personal world, world as a category and universal, integrative-personal approach, factors of self-realization

Abstract

The basic approaches to the research of the category and universals “world” that holds semantic idea about comprehension by human foundations and regularities of the organization of the surrounding reality are substantiated. A holistic worldview picture of reality is revealed in the dialectical unity of the subject-object and subject-subject interaction as the perfect form of the filling the subject meaning of fundamental properties of being. Personal world, comprehended from the vertices of philosophical-psychological reflection, appears as a conceptual model of multidimensional reflection-creation by the subject the life activity of reality, and at the same time ontophenomenal locus that combines comprehended and realized by it in the existential space as a hypostasis of human existentialization. Integrative-personal approach of H.O. Ball in the interpretation of the world within the human substantive integrity determines the boundless horizons of self-creation as a personality and individuality in the whirlwind of spiritualized self-cherishing and co-vital self-realization.

References

Myasoid, P. A., & Shatyrko, L. O. (Eds.). (2016). Akademik, V.A. Romenets: tvorchist i pratsi [Akademiс V.A. Romenets: creativity and work]. Kyiv: Lybid, 272 p. [in Ukrainian].

Ananyev, B. G. (1968). Chelovek kak predmet poznaniya [Human as an object of cognition]. Leningrad: Izd-vo LGU, 339 p. [in Russian].

Asmolov, A. N. (2002). Po tu storonu soznaniya: metodologicheskie problemy neklassicheskoy psihologii [On the other side of consciousness: the methodological problems of nonclassical psychology]. Moscow: “Smysl”. 480 p. [in Russian].

Ball, G. O. (2000). Do vyznachennia zasad ratsiohumanistychnoho pidkhodu u psykholohii [To determine the principles of ratio-humanistic approach to psychology]. Psychology and society – Psykholohiya i suspilstvo, 2, 74-89 [in Ukrainian].

Ball, G. O. (2004). Do obgruntuvannia ratsiohumanistychnoho pidkhodu u psykholohii [To study ratio-humanistic approach in psychology]. Psychology and society – Psykholohiya i suspilstvo, 4, 60-74 [in Ukrainian].

Ball, G. O. (2009). Intehratyvno-osobystisnyi pidkhid u psykholohii: vporiadkuvannia holovnykh poniat [Integrative-personal approach in psychology: the main streamlining concepts]. Psychology and society – Psykholohiya i suspilstvo, 4, 26-53 [in Ukrainian].

Ball, G., Medintsev, V. (2010) Lichnost kak modus kulturyi i kak integrativnoe kachestvo litsa [Personality as a mode of culture and as an integrative quality of a person]. The world of psychology – Mir psihologii, 4, 167-178. [in Russian].

Ball, G. O. (2007). Oriientyry suchasnoho humanizmu (v suspilnii, osvitnii, psykholohichnii sferakh) [Landmarks of modern humanism (in the social, educational, psychological spheres). Kyiv-Rivne: Vydavets Oleh Zen, 172 p. [in Ukrainian].

Ball, G. O. (2006). Psihologiya v ratsiogumanisticheskoy perspektive [Psychology in the ratio-humanistic perspective]. Kyiv: Izd-vo “Osnova”, 408 p. [in Russian].

Ball, G. O. (2015). Ratsiohumanistychnyi pidkhid do vyznachennia zasad tsinnisno nalashtovanoi sotsialnoi povedinky [Rational-humanistic approach to determining the value minded principles of social behavior]. (Ch. 1.). Psychology and Personality – Psykholohiya i osobystist, 2 (8), 6-22 [in Ukrainian].

Ball, G. O. (2011). Systema pryntsypiv ratsiohumanizmu [The system of ratio-humanism principles]. Psychology and society – Psykholohiya i suspilstvo, 4, 16-33 [in Ukrainian].

Ball, G. O. (2015). Teoretychna psykholohiia yak tsaryna naukovosti y dukhovnosti [Theoretical psychology as a scientific and spiritual realm]. Psychology and society – Psykholohiya i suspilstvo, 3, 72-79 [in Ukrainian].

Gubernuk, L. V. (2010). Life world as a specific personal experience of the human life [Zhyttevyi svit jak specyfichnyi osobystisnyi dosvid zhytteprozhyvannia ludyny]. Philosophical problems of the humanities – Filosofski problemy gumanitarnyh nauk, 18/19, 150-155, available at: http://www.info-library.com.ua/books-text-11464.html [in Ukrainian].

Gusserl, E. (2004). The crisis of European science and transcendental phenomenology [Krizis evropeyskih nauk i transcendentalnaya fenomenologiya]. – Sankt-Peterburg: Izd-vo “Vladimir Dal”, 400 p. [in Russian].

Kolotylo V. V. (2009). The modern picture of the world and the worldview of human [Suchasna kartyna svitu i svitogliad ludyny]. Philosophical problems of the humanities – Filosofski problemy gumanitarnyh nauk. – Kyiv: Mizhnarodnyi osvitnii fond im. Jaroslava Mudrogo, 193-197 [in Ukrainian].

Leontiev, A. N. (1983) Favorites Shows Psychological Works: In 2 t. [Izbrannye psihologicheskaye proizvedeniya: v 2 t.] . – M .: Pedagogika, 1983. – T. II. – 320 p. [in Russian].

Lichnostnyiy smyisl. (Deyatelnost. Soznanie. Lichnost.) [Personal meaning (Activity. Consciousness. Personality.)]. (Vol. 4.). Moscow: Politizdat, 1975. – 304 p. [in Russian].

Morshchakova, O. S. (2011). Sotsialni tsinnosti i vartisno-zmistove napovnennia protsesu sotsializatsii [Social values and value-semantic content of the socialization process]. Vitacultural Mill – Vitakulturnyi mlyn. Vol 13, 38-43 [in Ukrainian].

Kyrychuk, O. V., & Romenets V. A. (Eds.). (2006). Osnovy psykholohii [Principles of psychology]. Kyiv: Lybid, 632 p. [in Ukrainian].

Myasoid, P. A., & Furman, A. V. (Eds.). (2012). Psykholohiia vchynku: Shliakhamy tvorchosti V.A. Romentsia [Psychology act: the way of creativity, of Romenets V. A.]. Kyiv: Lybid, 296 p. [in Ukrainian].

Rybalka, V.V. (2009). Teorii osobystosti u vitchyznianii psykholohii ta pedahohitsi [Theories of personality in our psychology and pedagogy]. Odesa: Vydavets Bukaiev V.V., 575 p. [in Ukrainian].

Romenets, V. A. (2007). Іstorіya psikhologіi ХIХ – pochanku ХХ stolіttia [History of Psychology XIX – early XX century]. Kyiv: Lybіd, 832 p. [in Ukrainian].

Safonik, L.M. (2017). Kontseptualizatsiia sensu zhyttia u neklasychnykh filosofskykh pidkhodakh: sotsialno-antropolohichnyi kontekst [Conceptualizing the meaning of life in a non-classical philosophical approaches: social and anthropological context]. Lvivskyi natsionalnyi universytet im. I. Franka. Lviv, 40 p. [in Ukrainian].

Kapiton, V. P. (Ed.). (2008). Svitogliad i svit ludyny [Worldview and World of human]. Dnipropetrovsk: DDFA, 324 p. [in Ukrainian].

Tytarenko, T. M. (2003). Life world personality: inside and outside the ordinary [Zhyttevyj svit osobystosti: u mezhakh i za mezhamy budennosti]. – Kyiv: Lybid, 376 p. [in Ukrainian].

Fromm E. (1998.). Psihoanaliz i etika [Psychoanalysis and ethics]. P.S. Gurevich, S.Ja. Levit (Eds.). Moscow: AST, 566 p. [in Russian].

Furman, A. A. (2016). Psikhologіya osobystostі: sіnnіsno-orіentatsіyniy vimіr [Personality Psychology: value-orientation dimension]. Odesa: ONPU; Ternopіl: TNEU, 312 p. [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A. A. (2017). Metodolohichni aktsenty stosovno genezy psykholohichnoho znannia [Methodological emphases regarding genesis of psychological knowledge]. Nauka i osvita – Science and education, 1, 16-20 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A. V. (2013). Heneza nauky yak hlobalna doslidnytska prohrama: tsyklichno-vchynkova perspektyva [Genesis science as a global research program: act-cycle perspective]. Psykholohiya i suspilstvo – Psychology and society, 4, 18-36 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A. V. (2016). Metodoloh – profesiya maybutnioho [Methodologist – profession of the future]. Psykholohiya i suspilstvo – Psychology and society, 1, 16-42 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A. V. (2013). Paradyhma yak predmet metodolohichnoyi refleksiyi [Paradigm as a matter of methodological reflection]. Psykholohiya i suspilstvo – Psychology and society, 3, 72-85 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A. V. (2013). Psykhokultura yak samoorhanizovana sfera aksiobuttia [Psychoculture as a self-organizing sphere of axiology]. Vitacultural mill – Vitakulturnyi mlyn, vol. 15, 13–22.

Furman, A. V. (2015). Svit metodolohiyi [World of methodology]. Psychology and society – Psykholohiya i suspilstvo, 2, 47-60 [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A. V., Shandruk, S. K. (2014). Sutnist gry jak uchynennia [The essence of the game as the commission]. Ternopil: TNEU, 120 p. [in Ukrainian].

Yaroshevskiу, M. G. (1996). Istoriya psikhologii ot antichnosti do serediny XX veka [The history of psychology from antiquity to the middle of the XX century]. Moscow: Akademiya, 416 p. [in Russian].

Issue

Section

Статті

How to Cite

Furman, Anatoliy A. “Personal World As an Ontophenomenal Reality (to the Categorical Analysis of Heorhiy Ball)”. Psyhology & Society, no. 2, Mar. 2019, pp. 135-4, https://doi.org/10.35774/pis2017.02.135.