Methodological optics as a thought-deed tool
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35774/pis2022.02.006Keywords:
methodology as a sphere of thought-activity, scientific rationality, classical, non-classical, post-non-classical ideals/types of rationalityAbstract
The proposed research constitutes a completed author’s p r o j e c t of creating a complicated complex of multi-module methodological optics of multidisciplinary research of the post-non-classical mode-level of thought-activity implementation, which super-reflexively and meta-systemically complements: a) appropriate multi-parametric optics of the classical, non-classical and post-non-classical t y p e s of scientific rationality according to the logic of their categorical, criterion, attributive and thought-activity complication; b) a five-level structure-functional organization (implemented according to the philosophical categories “universal – general – special – specific”) of methodological m o d u l e s as collective tools of professional methodologization within the framework of the most culturally significant methodologies; c) the ideals, principles, strategies, and norms of the nascent p o s t – n o n – c l a s s i c a l methodology which advocates an interpenetrating type of connection between all sciences, establishes a dialogue of cultures, integrates the unity of truth and morality, rational knowledge and ethical behavior, legalizes mixed methods, paradigms, methodologems; d) foundations-postulates, categories, canons and epistemological organizations of a metamethodological optics which is currently being formed as the newest post-non-classical project of interconnected development trajectories of philosophy, science, methodology, is based on the understanding the optics as an integral mechanism or a complicated complex of selection tools and equipping the lenses-modules of interdependent understanding, thinking, activity, reflection in the canonical format of realization the a c t of metamethodologization, the subject of which is the study of existing methodological theories and systems, at the same time, it is the methodological optics that is the main synthetic objectification and paradigmatic center of the post-non-classical v e r s i o n of methodology advocated here. First of all, in connection with this, based on the principle of action, the essential quaternary subjectifications, the main causes, the instrument-categorical modules of logically perfected methodological optics, as well as the defining criteria for typological distinction of historically variable and culturally different in significance and influence i d e a l s of scientific rationality were revealed. At the same time, m o d e l s of methodological optics of classical, non-classical and post-non-classical science were created and characterized in detail for the first time, their ever-growing quantitatively and qualitatively parametric set was clearly defined, structure-functional connections were described, invariantly were accepted ideals and norms of cognitive activity and the main epistemological organizations and products. In addition, the arguments-positions of the emergence of a post-non-classical epistemology in the complementarity of epistemological and purely cognitive aspects of reflective consideration are detailed and systematized. A five-level categorical scheme of clearly organized lenses-modules of the latest methodological optics of theoretical construction and psychological cognition of modular-developmental interaction as a complex-systemic psychosocial phenomenon is argued. As a result, the methodological optics is grounded in four d i m e n s i o n s or m o d e s of its own thought-active being, namely: “metaphorical construct and categorical concept of philosophical and scientific methodologies”; “a special setting of the research and constructive consciousness in its essential environment – the intentionality of methodological thinking – to its own self-reflection”; “an original reasoning instrument and an effective tool for thought-activity and competent methodologization”; “an innovative modular complex of self-reflective lenses (mainly methods, means, mechanisms and instruments) of construction, cognition and transformation of reality which is used under specific conditions, tasks, resources, capabilities”.
References
Furman, A. V. & Furman, O. I. & Shandruk, S. K. & Co (Eds.). (2019). Vitakulturna metodolohiia: antolohiia. Do 25-richchia naukovoi shkoly profesora A.V. Furmana [Viticultural methodology: an anthology. To the 25th anniversary of professor A.V. Furman's Scientific School]. Ternopil: TNEU [in Ukrainian].
Hirniak, A.N. (2021). Phychological fundamentals of participants modular-developmental interaction process in the educational establichments: Thess for a doctors degree in Phychology: 19.00.07. Ivano-Frankivsk [in Ukrainian].
Huseltseva M.S. (2017). Metodolohichna optyka yak instrument piznannia [Methodological optics as a tool of cognition]. Psykholohiya i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 4, 39-55 [in Ukrainian].
https://doi.org/10.35774/pis2017.04.039
Guseltseva, M.S. (2021). Sub'iektno-diyalnisnui pidchid S.L. Rubinschteiana: neokantianstvo i marksuzm [Subject-aktivity approach of S.L. Rubinschtein: Neo-Kantianism and Marxism]. Psykholohiya i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 2, 102-121 [in Ukrainian].
https://doi.org/10.35774/pis2021.02.102
Furman, A.V. & Biskup, V.S. & Morschakova, O.S. (comp.) (2020). Zahalna sotsiolohiya [General sociology]. Kyiv: Lira-K [in Ukrainian].
Kant, I. (2001). Krytyka chystoho rozumu [Critique of pure reason]. (Trans. from german). Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Karpenko, Z.S. (2022). Kulturno-istoruchni modeli verufikacii efektuvnosti psykhoterapii [Cultural and historical models of verification of effectiveness of psychotherapy]. Psykholohiya i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 2, 97-112 [in Ukrainian].
Lakatos, I. (2016). Istoriya ta yy racionalni rekonstrucchii [History of a science and its rational reconstructions]. Psykholohiya i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 3, 13-23 [in Ukrainian].
Furman, A.V. & Furman, O.I. & Shandruk, S.K. & Co (2019). Metodolohiia i psykholohiia humanitarnoho piznannia. Do 25-richchia naukovoi shkoly profesora A. V. Furmana [Methodology and psychology of humanitarian cognition. To the 25th anniversary of professor A. V. Furman's scientific school]. Ternopil: TNEU [in Ukrainian].
Furman, A.V. (head editor) (2002). Modulno-rozvyvalna systema yak sotsiokul'turni orhanizatsiya [Modular and developmental system as socio-cultural organization]. Psykholohiya i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 3-4, 12-92 [in Ukrainian].
Rubinstein, S.L. (2021). Printsip tvorchoiy samodiyal'nosty [The principle of creative self-activity]. Psykholohiya i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 2, 97-101 [in Ukrainian].
https://doi.org/10.35774/pis2021.02.097
Furman, A.V. (Ed.). (2015). Systema suchasnykh metodolohii: khrestomatiia u 4-kh tomakh [The system of modern methodologies: a textbook in 4 volumes]. Ternopil: TNEU [in Ukrainian].
Furman, A.V. (2022). Arhitektonika teoriyi diyal'nosty: reflecsivno-vchunkoviyi scenariyi metametodolohuvannia [Architectonics of activity theory: reflexive-deed scenario of metamethodologization]. Psykholohiya i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 1, 7-94 [in Ukrainian].
https://doi.org/10.35774/pis2022.01.007
Furman, A.V. (2006). Vstup do teorii osvitnoi diialnosti [Introduction to the theory of educational activity]. Ternopil: Instytut ESO [in Ukrainian].
Furman, A.V. (2013). Geneza nauky yak hlobalna doslidnytska prohrama: tsyklichno-vchynkova perspektyva [Genesis of science as a global research program: cyclical-action perspective]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 4, 18-36 [in Ukrainian].
Furman, A.V. (2016). Ideia i zmist profesiinoho metodolohuvannia [The idea and content of professional methodology]. Ternopil: TNEU [in Ukrainian].
Furman, A.V. (2017). Metodolohichna optyka tsyklichno-vchynkovoi orhanizatsii teorii yak systemy orhanizatsii ratsionalnoho znannia [Methodological optics of cyclic-action organization of theory as a system of organization of rational knowledge]. Vitakulturnyi mlyn - Viticultural mill, 19, 4-15 [in Ukrainian].
Furman, A.V. (2021). Metateoretychna rekonstruktsiia systemomuslediialnisnyi pidkhid do rosuminnia svidomosti [Methodological reconstruction of system-thought-activity approach to consciousness understanding]. Psykholohiia osobystosti - Personality psychology, №1(10), 5-35 [in Ukrainian].
https://doi.org/10.35774/pis2021.01.005
Furman, A.V. (2013). Metodolohiia paradyhmalnykh doslidzhen u sotsialnii psykholohii [Methodology of paradigmatic research in social psychology]. Kyiv; Ternopil: TNEU [in Ukrainian].
Furman, A.V. (2005). Modulno-rozvyvalna orhanizatsiia myslediialnosti - skhema profesiinoho metodolohuvannia [Modular and developmental organization of thinking - a scheme of professional methodology]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 4, 40-69 [in Ukrainian].
Furman, A.V. (2017). Modulno-rozvyvalnyi orhprostir metodolohuvannia: arhumenty rozshyrennia [Modular-developmental organizational space of methodology: arguments of expansion]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 1, 34-49 [in Ukrainian].
https://doi.org/10.35774/pis2017.01.034
Furman, A.V. (1997). Modulno-rozvyvalne navchannia: pryntsypy, umovy, zabezpechennia [Modular and developmental education: principles, conditions, provision]. Kyiv: Pravda Iaroslavychiv [in Ukrainian].
Furman, A.V. (2013). Paradyhma yak predmet metodolohichnoi refleksii [Paradigm as a subject of methodological reflection]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 3, 72-85 [in Ukrainian].
Furman, A.V. (2011). Psykhokultura ukrainskoi mentalnosti [Psychoculture of the Ukrainian mentality]. Ternopil: Ekonomichna dumka [in Ukrainian].
Furman, O.Ye., Hirniak, A.N. (2020).Sutnisne vyznachennia modulno-rozvyvalnoi vzayemodiyi vykladacha i studentiv v osvitn'omu protsesi [The essential definitions of modular developmental interaction of teacher and students the educational process]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 3, 53-81 [in Ukrainian].
https://doi.org/10.35774/pis2020.03.053
Furman (Humeniuk), O.I. (2008). Teoriia i metodolohiia innovatsiino-psykholohichnoho klimatu zahalnoosvitnoho zakladu [Theory and methodology of innovation-psychological climate of the general educational institution]. Yalta-Ternopil: Pidruchnyky i posibnyky [in Ukrainian].
Shchedrovitsky, G.P. (2022). Zasadnuchi yiavlennia ta katehorijni zasoby teorii diial'nosti [Basic ideas and categorical means of activity theory]. Psykholohiya i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 1, 95-126 [in Ukrainian].
https://doi.org/10.35774/pis2022.01.095
Shchedrovitsky, G.P. (2005). Skhema myslediialnosti - systemno-strukturna budova, znachennia i zmist [The scheme of mentality - the system-structural structure, meaning and content]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 4, 29-39 [in Ukrainian].
Yakovenko, Yu.I. (2022). Metodolohichna travma v sotsiohumanitarnykh naukakh [Methodological trauma in the cocio-humanitarian sciences]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo - Psychology and society, 1, 127-148 [in Ukrainian].
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
1. PROPOSED POLICY FOR JOURNALS THAT OFFER OPEN ACCESS
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
2. PROPOSED POLICY FOR JOURNALS THAT OFFER DELAYED OPEN ACCESS
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work [SPECIFY PERIOD OF TIME] after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).