Dialogics of idea form-creation as a means of thinking
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35774/pis2020.03.005Keywords:
dialogics, theory, problem, idea, thinking, unknown/known, formal logic, antinomiesAbstract
Theoretical problems mostly arise in a situation of collision of mutually unacceptable provisions of a separate theory, which are in a state of active confrontation. Possible ways or methods of solving these problems are usually indicated by ideas – a kind of psychological tools of thinking, the structure and functional purpose of which allow reflecting the object of comprehension in many ways and holistically, thus preventing the prospect of its extreme manifestations as mutually contradictory concepts of one-sided theoretical ideas-approaches. The peculiarity of the idea form-creation process is determined by the fact that thinking, stimulating the functional purpose of the idea, uses while its development improved rules of concepts derivation and changed principles of proving their truth, which are different from those that caused the theoretical problem occurrence. The improvement of these rules and the change of principles is carried out by taking into account the function of the operational component of thinking as a such, which leaves behind its categorical component only the function of the source of links to be reorganized. Mental operations that carry out this reorganization are triadic inferences, the use of which through thinking as psychological tools is possible by providing the content of the conceivable form of dialogics, i.e. a kind of dialogue logic of two logics, which meets the requirements of dialogical essence of thinking and principles of dialectics. Dialogics considers formally mutually contradictory understanding positions of one and the same object of comprehension, organizing them as a positively significant form of a theoretical problem statement. To solve it successfully, dialogics uses the idea as a mental tool, which is given the form of a dialectical-logical concept that can reflect the essence of a particular theoretical problem, manifested in the form of dialectical unity of formally opposite theoretical positions. Most importantly, the idea as a mental tool of reflecting the essence of the problem raises the theoretical comprehension of the investigated object over the functional degree of finding its place in a particular concept or paradigmatic model and opens the prospect of its objectification at the metaparadigmatic level in an exhaustive category-methodological completeness.
References
Arbib, M. (1976). Metaforicheskiy mozg [Metaphorical brain]. Moscow [in Russian].
Aristotel (1952). Analitiki pervaya i vtoraya [Analysts one and two]. Moscow: GIPL [in Russian].
Asmus, V. F. (1947). Logika [Logics]. Moscow [in Russian].
Asmus, V. F. (1956). Dekart [Descartes]. Moscow [in Russian].
Asmus, V. F. (1965). Problema intuitsii v filosofii i matematike [The problem of intuition in philosophy and mathematics]. Moscow [in Russian].
Asmus, V. F. (1973). Immanuil Kant [Immanuel Kant]. Moscow [in Russian].
Asmus, V. F. (1975). Platon [Plato]. Moscow [in Russian].
Ball, G. A. (1990). Teoriya uchebnyih zadach: psihologo-pedagogicheskiy aspect [Theory of educational problems: psychological and pedagogical aspect]. Moscow [in Russian].
Bahtin, M. M. (1975). Voprosyi literaturyi i estetiki: issledovaniya rannih let [Literature and aesthetics: early studies]. Moscow [in Russian].
Bahtin, M. M. (1972). Problemy poetiki Dostoevskogo [Problems of poetics of Dostoevskiy]. Moscow [in Russian].
Bahtin, M. M. (1990). Tvorchestvo Fransua Rable i narodnaya kultura srednevekovya i Renessansa [The work of Francois Rabelais and the folk culture of the Middle Ages and the Renaissance]. Moscow [in Russian].
Bahtin, M. M. (1986). Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva [Aesthetics of verbal creativity]. Moscow [in Russian].
Bibler, V. S. (1990). Nravstvennost. Kultura. Sovremennost [Moral. The culture. Modernity]. Moscow [in Russian].
Bibler, V. S. (1991). Ot naukoucheniya – k logike kulturyi. Dva filosofskih vvedeniya v dvadtsat pervyiy vek [From science to the logic of culture. Two philosophical introductions to the twenty-first century]. Moscow [in Russian].
Bibler, V. S. (1993). Samostoyanie cheloveka [Human autonomy]. Kemerovo [in Russian].
Blek, M. (1990). Metafora. Teoriya metafory [Metaphor. Theory of Metaphor]. Moscow [in Russian].
Bogomolov, A. S. (1959). Kritika subyektivno-idealisticheskoy filosofii D.Berkli: lektsiya [Criticism of the subjective-idealistic philosophy of D. Berkeley: lecture]. Moscow: MGU [in Russian].
Bogomolov, A. S. (1982). Dialekticheskiy logos [Dialectical logo]. Moscow [in Russian].
Bocharov, V. A. (1984). Aristotel i traditsionnaya logika: Analiz sillogisticheskih teoriy [Aristotle and traditional logic: Analysis of syllogistic theories]. Moscow [in Russian].
Brokgauz-Efron (1911). Biblioteka samoobrazovaniya. Filosofskiy slovar [Self-education library. Philosophical Dictionary]. St. Petersburg [in Russian].
Brushlinskiy, A. V. (1979). Myshlenie i prognozirovanie [Thinking and forecasting]. Moscow [in Russian].
Brushlinskiy, A. V. (1982). Myshlenie: protsess, deyatelnost, obschenie [Thinking: process, activity, communication]. Moscow [in Russian].
Bush, G. Y. (1985). Dialogika i tvorchestvo [Dialogue and creativity]. Riga [in Russian].
Vasileva, M. U. (2009). Kant i Berkli: Shodstvo ili razlichie [Kant and Berkeley: Similarities or Differences]. Kantovsiy sbornik – Kant’s collection, 1, 30–39 [in Russian].
Vundt, V. (2007). Vvedenie v psihologiyu [Introduction to psychology]. Moscow [in Russian].
Vundt, V. (2011). Vvedenie v filosofiyu [Introduction to Philosophy]. Moscow: Kanon+ROI «Reabilitatsiya» [in Russian].
Vygotskiy, L. S. (1992). Myshlenie i rech [Thinking and Speech]. Vol. 2. Moscow: Pedagogika [in Russian].
Gaydenko, P. P. (1978). G. Fihte. Istoriya dialektiki: Nemetskaya klassicheskaya filosofiya [G. Fichte. The History of Dialectics: German Classical Philosophy]. Moscow [in Russian].
Gaydenko, P. P. (1979). Filosofiya Fihte i sovremennost [Fichte’s philosophy and modernity]. Moscow [in Russian].
Gaydenko, P. P. (1983). Dekart [Descartes]. Filosofskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar – Philosophical Encyclopedic Dictionary, 142–144. Moscow [in Russian].
Gryaznov, A. F. (1987). Kantovskaya otsenka idealizma [Kant’s assessment of idealism]. Istoriko-filosofskiy ejegodnik – Historical and philosophical yearbook, 93–106. Moscow [in Russian].
Gegel, G. V. F. (1970–1972). Nauka logiki [The science of logic]. Vol. 1–3. Moscow [in Russian].
Geyne, G. (1982). Stihotvoreniya. Poemy [Lyrics. Poems]. Vol. 2. Moscow [in Russian].
Getmanova, A. D. (1986). Logika [Logics]. Moscow [in Russian].
Gusev, S. S. (1984). Nauka i metafora [Science and metaphor]. Leningrad [in Russian].
Davyidov, V. V. (1972). Vidyi obobscheniya v obuchenii (Logiko-psihol. problemy postroeniya uchebnyih predmetov) [Types of generalization in training (Logical-psychological. Problems of building educational subjects)]. Moscow [in Russian].
Dekart, R. (1950). Izbrannyie proizvedeniya [Selected Works]. Moscow – Leningrad [in Russian].
Orudjeva, Z. M. & Sheptulina, A. P. (Eds.). (1986). Dialekticheskaya logika [Dialectical logic]. Moscow [in Russian].
Jinkin, N. I. (1958). Mehanizmy rechi [The mechanisms of speech]. Moscow [in Russian].
Jinkin, N. I. (1964). O kodovyih perehodah vo vnutrenney rechi [About code transitions in inner speech]. Voprosyi yazyikoznaniya – Questions of linguistics, 6, 26–39 [in Russian].
Ilenkov, I. V. (1984). Dialekticheskaya logika: Ocherki istorii i teorii [Dialectical logic: essays on history and theory]. Moscow [in Russian].
Kant, I. (1963–1966). Kritika sposobnosti sujdeniya [Criticism of the ability of judgment]. Vol. 5. Moscow [in Russian].
Kant, I. (1963–1966). Kritika chistogo razuma [Criticism of pure reason]. Vol 3. Moscow [in Russian].
Kalujin, L. & Pogrebyisskiy, I. & Gryaznov, B. Leybnits. Formalnaya logika [Leibniz. Formal logic]. Filosofskaya entsiklopediya – Philosophical Encyclopedia, Vol. 3, 52–59 [in Russian].
Kenig, E. V. (1902 (2012)). Vundt. Ego filosofiya i psihologiya [Wundt. His philosophy and psychology]. St. Petersburg [in Russian].
Kirillov, V. I. & Starchenko, A. A. (1987). Logika [Logics]. Moscow [in Russian].
Kumpf, F. & Orudjev, Z. (1979). Dialekticheskaya logika: Osnovnyie printsipyi i problemy [Dialectical logic: Basic principles and problems]. Moscow [in Russian].
Leontev, A. N. (1972). Problemy razvitiya psihiki [Problems of development of the psyche]. Moscow [in Russian].
Leybnits, G. V. (1982–1989). Sochineniya [Works]. Vol. 1–4. Moscow [in Russian].
Losev, A. F. (1990). Jiznennyiy i tvorcheskiy put Platona [Life and career of Plato]. Platon. Sobranie sochineniy – Plato. Collected works, vol. 1, 3–63. Moscow [in Russian].
Lokk, D. (1973). Opyt o chelovecheskom razumenii [Experience of human understanding]. Vol. 2. Moscow [in Russian].
Lyatker, Y. A. (1975). Dekart [Descartes]. Moscow [in Russian].
Marks, K. (1988). Protsess proizvodstva kapitala [The process of capital production]. Vol. 1. Kapital. Kritika politicheskoy ekonomii – Capital. Criticism of political economy. Moscow [in Russian].
Markish, S. P. (1971). Znakomstvo s Erazmom iz Rotterdama [Acquaintance with erasmus from Rotterdam]. Moscow [in Russian].
Mayorov, G. G. (1983). Leybnits [Leibniz]. Filosofskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar – Philosophical encyclopedic dictionary, 304–305. Moscow [in Russian].
Matvievskaya, G. P. (1976). Rene Dekart [Rene Descartes]. Moscow [in Russian].
Molyako, V. A. (1970). Psihologiya tvorcheskoy deyatelnosti [Psychology of creative activity]. Kiev [in Russian].
Molyako, V. A. (1983). Psihologiya konstruktorskoy deyatelnosti [Psychology of design activity]. Moscow [in Russian].
Narskiy, I. S. (1972). Gotfrid Leybnits [Gottfried Leibniz]. Moscow [in Russian].
Narskiy, I. S. (1973). David Yum [David Hume]. Moscow [in Russian].
Narskiy, I. S. (1978). G.V.F. Gegel [G.V.F. Hegel]. Istoriya dialektiki: nemetskaya klassicheskaya filosofiya – The history of dialectics: german classical philosophy. Moscow [in Russian].
Pavilenis, R. Y. (1983). Problemy smysla [Problems of meaning]. Moscow [in Russian].
Platon (1990). Sobranie sochineniy [Collected works]. Vol. 1. Moscow [in Russian].
Panfilov, V. A. (2004). Filosofiya matematiki Leybnitsa [The philosophy of mathematics Leibniz]. Dnіpropetrovsk. DNU [in Russian].
Popov, P. S. (1957). Sujdenie [Judgment]. Moscow: MGU [in Russian].
Rubinshteyn, S. L. (1958). O myshlenii i putyah ego issledovaniya [About thinking and ways of its research]. Moscow [in Russian].
Rybalka, V. V. (2010). Psihologiya chesti i dostoinstva lichnosti [Psychology of honor and dignity of a person]. Odessa [in Russian].
Sayko, E. V. (2014). Myshlenie, mysl, smysl v strukture bazovyih osnovaniy sistemnoy tselostnosti – Chelovek [Thinking, thought, meaning in the structure of the basic foundations of systemic integrity – Human]. Mir psihologii – World of psychology, 1 (77), 3–15 [in Russian].
Samoylov, A. E. (1997). Teoreticheskie problemy logiko-psihologicheskogo analiza myshleniya [Theoretical problems of the logical and psychological analysis of thinking]. Zaporoje [in Russian].
Samoylov, A. E. (2007). Psihologiya paradoksalnogo myshleniya ili prognosticheskiy dialog teorii s empiriey [The psychology of paradoxical thinking or the predictive dialogue of theory with empiricism]. Dnepropetrovsk [in Russian].
Samoylov, O. I. (1996). Psykholohichnyi smysl ironizuvannia v protsesi spilkuvannia. Ukrainska psykholohiia: suchasnyi potentsial. Materialy chetvertykh Kostiukovskykh chytan – Materials of the fourth Kostyukov readings, Vol. 3, 57–63 Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Samoylov, A. E. (2000). Dialogichnost kak suschnost protsessa myshleniya [Dialogue as the essence of the thinking process]. Pedagogіka і psihologіya formuvannya tvorchoi osobistostі: problemi і poshuki – Pedagogy and psychology of the form of creative specialties: problems and searches, 46–50. Kyiv–Zaporіzhia [in Russian].
Samoylov, A. E. (2002). Logicheskiy vyvod i dostovernyi prognoz. Osobennosti formirovaniya i formulirovaniya [Logical conclusion and reliable forecast. Features of formation and formulation]. Vіsnik HGU – Bulletin of HGU, Vol. 550, 201–208. Vіsnik HGU [in Russian].
Samoylov, O. I. (2006). Dіalogіka transtsendentalnogo prognozu [Dialogue of transcendental prognosis]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo – Psychology and society, 2, 93–110 [in Ukrainian].
Samoylov, A. E. (2007). Intuitivnyi dialektiko-logicheskiy prognoz formy i funktsii ponyatiy psihologii myshleniya [Intuitive dialectical-logical forecast of the form and function of concepts of psychology of thinking]. Praktichna psihologіya ta sotsіalna robota – Practical psychology and social work, 12, 1–7 [in Russian].
Samoylov, A. E. (2008). Psihologiya myshleniya kak empiricheyakaya nauka [Psychology of thinking as an empirical science]. Praktichna psihologіya ta sotsіalna robota – Practical psychology and social work, 1, 2–9 [in Russian].
Samoylov, O. I. (2008). Psihologіchniy zmіst boyovoi pіdgotovki u kontekstі dіalogu dvoh logіk [Psychological content of combat training in the context of the dialogue of two logicians]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo – Psychology and society, 4, 122–126 [in Ukrainian].
Samoylov, O. I. (2015). Zmіst ta forma postanovki teoretichnoї problem [The content and form of the theoretical problem]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo – Psychology and society, 2, 31–36 [in Ukrainian].
Svintsov, V. N. (1987). Logika [Logics]. Moscow [in Russian].
Sokolov, A. N. (2007). Vnutrennyaya rech i myshlenie [Inner speech and thinking]. Moscow [in Russian].
Tkachenko, A. A. (1993). Teoriya dialektiko-logicheskogo dokazatelstva [The theory of dialectical-logical proof]. Zaporoje [in Russian].
Furman, A. V. (1992). Aktualnі pitannya metodologії problemnogo navchannya [Aktualni pytannia metodolohii problemnoho navchannia]. Pedagogіka – Pedagogy, Vol. 31, 3–14. Kyiv: Rad. shkola [in Ukrainian].
Furman, A. V. (1985). Vliyanie osobennostey problemnoy situatsii na razvitie myshleniya uchaschihsya [The influence of the peculiarities of the problem situation on the development of students thinking]. Voprosyi psihologii – Questions psychologists, 2, 68–72 [in Russian].
Furman, A. V. (2007). Navchalna problemna sytuatsiia yak obiekt psykholohichnoho piznannia [Learning problem situation as an object of psychological cognition]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo – Psychology and society, 1, 9–80 [in Ukrainian].
Furman, A. V. (1991). Problemni sytuatsii v navchanni [Problem situations in learning]. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Furman, A. V. (1989). Problemno-dialohichna sytuatsiia yak umova rozvytku piznavalnoi aktyvnosti shkoliariv u protsesi navchannia [Problem-dialogue situation as a condition for the development of cognitive activity of students in the learning process]. Psykholohiia – Psychology, Vol. 33, 16–25. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Furman, A. V. (1990). Problemnyiy dialog: metodologiya obosnovaniya i analiza. [Problematic dialogue: justification and analysis methodology]. V mire dialoga – In a world of dialogue, 16–19. Moscow [in Russian].
Furman, A. V. (1994). Psihologo-pedagogіchna teorіya navchalnih problemnih situatsіy [Psychological and pedagogical theory of educational problem situations]. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Furman A.V. (2007). Teorіya navchalnih problemnih situatsіy: psihologo-didaktichniy aspect [Theory of educational problem situations: psychological and didactic aspect]. Ternopіl: Aston [in Ukrainian].
Holts H. (1986). Dialektika Leybnitsa [Dialectic of Leibniz]. Filosofskie nauki – Philosophical sciences, 3, 128–137 [in Russian].
Shashkevich P.D. (1960). Teoriya poznaniya Immanuila Kanta [Theory of knowledge of Immanuel Kant]. Moscow [in Russian].
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
1. PROPOSED POLICY FOR JOURNALS THAT OFFER OPEN ACCESS
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
2. PROPOSED POLICY FOR JOURNALS THAT OFFER DELAYED OPEN ACCESS
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work [SPECIFY PERIOD OF TIME] after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
