Relationship between value-oriented and motivational spheres of personality

Authors

  • Yuliia Karpiuk Candidate of Psychological Sciences, Docent of the General and Clinical Psychology Department of Precarpathian National University named after Vasyl Stefanyk, Ivano-Frankivsk. kzep@pnu.edu.ua ORCID: 0000-0001-6602-4302 http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6602-4302

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35774/pis2021.02.169

Keywords:

axiological psychology, being, value, morality, motives, personality, value orientation

Abstract

The article deals with reflexive analysis of the peculiarities of the correlation of the components of value-orientation and motivational spheres of man. The formation of the individual as a full member and co-creator of the surrounding reality is characterized by a stable system of internal motives – motivational aspirations, taking into account social requirements and a personified system of values. The result of the interaction between man and the world is the discovery of a person’s synthesized expression of cost priorities or clear orientations and motives on the path to self-improvement. The complex and multi-faceted structure of value-orientation and motivational components of the individual involves a conscious progression to the implementation of a significant number of strategies, principles, criteria and parameters of their research. Therefore, it is expedient to use a systematic approach to the knowledge of the value orientations of man in the relationship of his personality and social guidance, creating a motivational field of its activity. On the basis of empirical search, types of value-motivational profile of respondents were distinguished: progressive, regressive, impulsive, expressive, trivial. It is proved that value orientations of a person are formed under the influence of conscious choice of cost priorities and are manifested in the through motive of committing. Valuable orientations are the basis for realizing the personality of rational choice of approaches and principles in achieving positive (from the evaluative positions of the person himself) results of his actions, whereas the process or procedure of this choice is based on the motives that determine the tools (means, forms, mechanisms and methods) of direct activity . Personality is guided by the choice of strategies for self-improvement, mainly by a system of values, which, transforming into a person’s value orientations, produce its motives-the desire for full self-realization under the actual conditions of situational everyday life.

References

Abulhanova-Slavskaya, K. A. (1991). Strategiya zhizni [Life strategy]. - Moscow: Mysl [in Russian].

Humeniuk, O. E. (2003). Psykhologiya vplyvu. [Psychology of influence]. Ternopil: Ekonomichna dumka [in Ukrainian].

Karpenko, Z. S. (2009). Aksiolohichna psykholohiia osobystosti [Axiological personality psychology]. Ivano-Frankivsk: Lileia-NV [in Ukrainian].

Karpiuk, U. I. (2012). Vplyv khrystyianskoi morali na tsinnisno-oriientatsiinu sferu molodshykh shkoliariv [Influence of Christian morality on the value-orientation sphere of junior pupils]. Natsionalna akademiia Derzhavnoi prykordonnoi sluzhby Ukrainy imeni Bohdana Khmelnytskoho. Khmelnytskyi [in Ukrainian].

Maslow, A. G. (1999). Motivatsia lichnosti [Personality motivation]. Moscow: Smysl [in Russian].

Maslow, A. G. (1999). Novye rubezhi chelovecheskoj prirody [New frontiers of human nature]. Moscow: Smysl [in Russian].

Milman, V. E. (2005). Motivatsiya tvorchestva i rosta: Struktura. Diagnostika. Razvitie [Motivation of creativity and growth: Structure. Diagnostics. Development]. Moscow: Mireya i ko [in Russian].

Rubinshteyn, S. L. (2003). Bytie i soznanie. Chelovek i mir [Being and consciousness. Man and the world]. St. Petersburg: Piter [in Russian].

Sannikova, O. P. (2003). Fenomenologiya lichnosti: Izbrannyie psihologicheskie trudyi [Phenomenology of personality: Selected psychological works]. Odessa: SMIL [in Russian].

Furman, A. A. (2016). Psykhologiya osobystosti: tsinnisno-orientatsiinyi vymir. [Personality Psychology: value-orientation dimension]. Odesa: ONPU, Ternopil: TNEU [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A., & Humenuk, O., & Trach, U. (2010). Metodolohichne obgruntuvannia kontseptsii motyvatsiinykh psykhoform [Methodological justification of the concept of motivational psychoforms]. Vitakulturnyi mlyn, 15, 13-22 [in Ukrainian].

Osgood, C. E., & Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The measurement of meaning Urbana, Chicago and London: University of Illinois Press [in English].

Issue

Section

Статті

How to Cite

Karpiuk, Yuliia. “Relationship Between Value-Oriented and Motivational Spheres of Personality”. Psyhology & Society, no. 2, Nov. 2021, pp. 169-76, https://doi.org/10.35774/pis2021.02.169.

Most read articles by the same author(s)