Structural-functional model of artistic abilities formation

Authors

  • Oleh Tkacuk Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Theory and Methodology of Decorative Arts and Graphics of the South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University named after KD Ushinskogo, Odesa.
  • Olena Polysayeva lecturer of the Department of Theory and Methodology of Decorative Arts and Graphics of the South-Ukrainian National Pedagogical University named after K.D. Ushinskogo, Odesa.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35774/pis2018.01.187

Keywords:

modeling, model, creative personality, artistic abilities, ability, classification and stages of modeling

Abstract

The article deals with general approaches concerning the study of methods of modeling a creative person, their classification, stages and an attempt to create a structural-functional model of interdependent formation of artistic abilities components. In particular, the principles of scientific modeling are analyzed, the content of concepts “model” and “modeling” is considered, the definition of general interpretation of the term “artistic abilities” is given. Phenomenologically indicated abilities are the complex synthetic quality of a specialist in combination with the individual psychological properties of his personality and persistent ability-skills in the professional implementation of fine art activity. Instead, artistic ability is a broader concept that covers the entire field of artist’s implementation of his professional functions and tasks at the creative stage of his work. The proposed author’s model creates an effective basis for considering the process of organizing the formation of future artist’s abilities during an ascent by a complex creative way of university education. The basic professional components, which are psychological factors of purposeful development of personality creative potential, are highlighted. It is noted that psychology of artistic creativity is a section of psychology of an art, the subject field of which includes the study of regularities of upbringing process and the aesthetic development of personality, the perception and understanding of works of art by people, on the one hand, and the direct process of psycho-spiritual creation of artistic works by the artist – on the other. It is obvious that the artist, creating an objective work of art, remains the subject of his perception, emotionally and even sensually passionately reacting to it, which conflicts with his personal and thus stimulates the creative individual one growth.

References

Ball G. O. Psihologia v raciogumanisticheskoy perspektive: Izbrannuje rabotu. G. O. Ball. K.: Izd-vo “Osnova”, 2006. 408 s.

Brushlinskiy A. V. Tvorcheskiy process kak predmet issledovanijy. A. V. Brushlinskiy. Voprosu filosofii. 1965. №7. S. 65–73.

Vartovskiy M. V. Modeli. Reprezentacuy i nauchnoe ponimanie:. M. V. Vartovskiy. Per. s angl. Obsh. red. i poslesl. I. B. Novikova i V. N. Sadkovskogo. M.: Proces, 1988. 507 s.

Venikov V.A. Nekotorue filosofskie problem modelirovaniy. “Filosofskie problemu kibernetiki”. V. A. Venikov. Materialu k simpoziymy “Dialektika i sovrimennoe estestvoznanie”. Vyp. №3. M., 1966. S. 47-49.

Venikov V. A. Modelirovanie v nayke i texnike. V. A. Venikov. Nayka i chelovechistvo. M.: Znanie, 1966. 399 s.

Gumenuk O. E. Metodologichna model innovaciino-psixologichnogo klimatu. Psihologija i suspil’stvo. 2005. №4. S. 70–83.

Zinovev A. A. Logicheskay model kak sredstvo naychnogo isledovaniy. A. A. Zinovev, I. I. Revzin. Voprosy Filosofiyi. 1960. № 1.

Zukov E. V. Psihologicheskie osobenosti ispolsovaniy modeiey kak opor pri usvoenii znaniy vusokogo urovny abstraktnosti: avtorev. dis. … kand. ped. nayk: 13.00.01. E. V. Zukov. M.: MGY, 1980. 241 s.

Levina I. A. Professionalnay deytelnast ychitely po formirovanij poznavatelnoy samostoytelnosty podrostkov sredstvami modelirovaniy: dis. … kandidata pedagogicheskih nayk : 13.00.04. I. A. Levina. Odessa, 2001. 283 s.

Leontev A. H. K voprosu o modelirovanii i matematizacuy v psihologii. A. H. Leontev, E. H. Jafarov. Voprosu psihologii. 1973. № 3. S. 3-15.

Maksveli D. K. Staty i rechi. D. K. Maksvell. М., 1968. 422 s.

Modelirovanie psihicheskoy deytelnosti. Pered zagl. avt.: A. A. Bratko, P. P. Volrov, A. N. Kochergin, G. I. Caregorodcev. М.: Мysl, 1969. 384 s.

Nikandrov V. V. Metod modelirovaniy v psihologii. V. V. Nikandrov. SPB.: Rech, 2003. 55 s.

Starovojtjenko Е.B. Sovrjemjennaja psihologija: formy intjelljektual’noj zhizni. Еljena Starovojtjenko. M.: Akad. Projekt, 2001. 544 s. (Gaudeamus).

Tkachyk O. V. Psihologiy hudojnih zdatnostey: Monografiy. O. V. Tkachyk. Odessa: vudavec Bukaev Vadum Viktorovuch, 2012. 372 s.: іl.

Tkachyk O. V. Rozrobka ta vukoruztanny metoduku “koloroznavstva” dla doslidjenna hudojnih zdibnostey”. Naukovo-praktuchnuy jurnal Pivdennogo naukovogo centru АPN Ukrainu “Nauka i osvita”. Vup. 4-5. О., 2010/LXXXII. S. 48-55.

Tkachyk O. V. Structurno-functionalnaja model organizacii of artistic capabilities. Кishinev 2012. S. 33-38. [rjezhim dostupu do rjesursu]: univers pedagogic Academia de Etiinue a Moldovei https://ibn.idsi.md/sites/default/files/j_nr_file/up.2012.4.pdf

Romenets V.A. Vykhovannia tvorchykh zdibnostei u studentiv. Volodymyr Romenets. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo. 2018. №1–2.

Romenets V.A. Psykholohiia tvorchosti : [navch. posib.]. Volodymyr Romenets. K.: lybid, 2004. 288 s.

Furman A. V. Idjeja profjesijnogo metodologuvannja: [Monografija]. A. V. Furman. Ternopіl’ : TNEU, 2016. 387 s.

Furman A.V. Modul’no-rozvihval’na organizacija misledjiylnosti shaема profjesijnogo mjetodologuvannja. Psyhologija i suspil’stvo. 2005. № 4. S. 40-69.

Furman O.Ie. Psykholohichni parametry innovatsiino-psykholohichnoho klimatu zahalnoosvitnoho zakladu : dys… doktora psykholohichnykh nauk: 19.00.07. Oksana Yevstakhiivna Furman: DNZ “Pivdennoukrainskyi natsionalnyi pedahohichnyi universytet imeni K.D. Ushynskoho”. Odesa, 2015. 464 s.

Chornuy E. V. Psihologiy modelurovany polikylturnoyi osvity: Monografiya. E. V. Chorniy. Simferopol: CONAT, 2010. 540 c.

Shadrikov V. D. Psihologiy deytel’nocti и sposobnosti cheloveka. V. D. Shadrikov. Uchebnoe posobie, 2-е izd,, pererab. i dop. М.; Izdatelskaja korporactija “Logos”, 1996. 320 s: il.

Shandruk S.K. Psykholohichni zasady rozvytku profesiinykh tvorchykh zdibnostei maibutnikh praktychnykh psykholohiv: avtoref. dys… na zdobuttia doktora psykholohichnykh nauk: 19.00.07. Serhii Kostiantynovych Shandruk: DNZ “Pivdennoukrainskyi natsionalnyi pedahohichnyi universytet imeni K.D. Ushynskoho”. Odesa, 2016. 36 s.

Shandruk S.K. Psykholohiia profesiinykh tvorchykh zdibnostei : [monohrafiia]. Serhii Shandruk. Ternopil: TNEU, 2015. 357 s.

Shandruk S.K. Teoretychna model rozvytku profesiynykh tvorchykh zdibnostei osobystosti praktychnoho psykholoha. Serhii Shandruk. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo. 2015. №4. S. 107–121.

Schjedrovickij G. P. Mjetodologichna organizacija sistemno-structurnuh dozlidzhen’ i rozrobok. Psyhologija i suspil’stvo. 2004. №2. S. 30–49.

Issue

Section

Статті

How to Cite

Tkacuk, Oleh, and Olena Polysayeva. “Structural-Functional Model of Artistic Abilities Formation”. Psyhology & Society, no. 1-2, Mar. 2019, pp. 187-94, https://doi.org/10.35774/pis2018.01.187.