Responsibility of personality in coordinates of psychological analysis

Authors

  • Arsen Lypka Administrative Manager and Master of Social Management, postgraduate student of the Department of Psychology and Social Work of the Ternopil National Economic University, Ternopil. ORCID: 0000-0002-1981-4675 http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1981-4675

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35774/pis2018.01.109

Keywords:

personality, responsibility, external, internal, socialization, mentally-cognitive, emotional-motivational, behavioral-volitional, moral-spiritual components of responsibility, phenomenological analysis

Abstract

Responsibility – is a very complex psychosocial phenomenon, which permeates all spheres of human life - from personal to economic and even political. Therefore, the work considers it as a social phenomenon and as a personal trait and at the same time as an important theoretical construct of modern psychology, which enables to attribute a special independent status to the properties of social and cultural events, life and psychological changes. Has been analyzed the formation of the phenomenon of personal responsibility through the processes of socialization and personalization, has been singled out a group of determination factors, which in the complementarity actualize the emergence of a four-component structure of responsibility and make it possible to identify the important components of the canon of the person responsibility. The article deals with causing and revealing of responsibility in the public everyday life, in particular in externals and internal ones. It has been proved that the internals, being oriented towards the future, live internally “here and now”, and therefore more personally responsible, and the externals, defending retrospective intentions, focusing on past events, which in the world perception rejects them to the past. At the same time it was singled out four groups of determinative factors of personal responsibility: global (civilized or common-human); macro- – at the level of separate countries, regions; meso- – available in the space of organizations, labor, educational or other groups; micro-factors, that is, those that are found at the level of medium and small groups and a specific person. On the basis of the analysis of the structural construction of the responsibility phenomenon, it was offered the first component – cognitive - to combine with the mental one, in which, in addition to the intellectual potential, also is preserved the archaic experience. In this regard, it is proposed to call it “mentally-cognitive”.

References

Bahtin M. M. Voprosy literatury i estetiki: Issledovaniya raznyh let. Michail Michaylovich Bahtin. M.: Hudozh. L-ra, 1975. 504 s.

Donchenko E. A. Sotsietalnaya psihika. E. A. Donchenko. K.: Naukova dumka, 1994. 208 s.

Entsyklopediya osvity. Akad. ped. nauk. Ukrainy; hol. red. V. H. Kremen’. K.; Yurinkom Inter, 2008. 1040 s.

Yonas H. Pryntsyp vidpovidal’nosti. U poshukah etyky dlya tehnolohichnoi tsyvilizatsii. H. Yonas; per. z nim. K.: Libra, 2001. 400 s.

Muzdybaev K. Psiholohiya otvetstvennosti. K. Muzdybaev. L.: Nauka, 1983. 240 s.

Rodgers K. R. Vzglyad na psihoterapiyu. Stanovlenie cheloveka. Karl Rodgers; per. s anhl. [obshch. red. i predisl. Iseninoy E. I.]. M.: Izd. Gruppa “Progress”, “Univers”, 1994. 480 s.

Rubinshteyn S. L. Bytie i soznanie. Chelovek i mir. Sergey Leonidovich Rubinshteyn. SPb.: Piter, 2003. 512 s. (Seriya “Mastera psiholohii”).

Rubinshteyn S. L. Osnovy obshchey psiholohii. Sergey Leonidovich Rubinshteyn. SPb.: Piter, 2000. 712 s.

Savchyn M. V. Psyholohiya vidpovidal’nosti povedinky. M. V. Savchyn. K.: Ukraina-Vita, 1996. 130 s.

Savchyn M. V. Svoboda i vidpovidal’nist’ osobystosti. Myroslav Savchyn. Psyholohiya i suspil’stvo. 2007. - №4. S.73. 80.

Savchyn M. V. Psyholohiya vidpovidal’noi povedinky : [monohrafiya]. M. V. Savchyn. Ivano-Frankivs’k: Misto NV, 2008. 280 s.

Tret’yachenko V. V., Baranova S. V., Bochonkova Yu. O., Terenina L. V. ta in. Psyholohichna kul’tura osobystosti v umovah hlobalizatsii svitu: Monohrafiya. Za zah. red. Tret’yachenko V. V. Luhans’k: Svitlytsya, 2006. 352 s.

Furman (Humeniyk) O. Ye. Psyholohiya Ya-kontseptsii: navch. pos. O. Ye. Furman (Humeniyk). Ternopil: Ekonomichna dumka, 2004. 310 s.

Furman (Humeniyk) O. Ye. Teoriya i metodolohiya innovatsiyno-psyholohichnoho klimatu zahal’noosvitn’oho zakladu : [monohrafiya]. O. Ye. Furman (Humeniyk). Yalta-Ternopil: Pidruchnyky i posibnyky, 2008. 340 s.

Furman A. V. Psyhokul’tura ukrains’koi mental’nosti. A. V. Furman. Ternopil: Ekonomichna dumka, 2002. 132 s.

Furman A. V. Ideya profesiynoho metodolohuvannya: [monohrafiya]. Anatoliy V/ Furman. Yalta-Ternopil: Ekonomichna dumka, 2008. 205 s.

Furman A. V. Sotsial’na kul’tura. Anatoliy V. Furman, Olena Morshchakova. Psyholohiya i suspil’stvo. 2015. №1. S. 26. 36.

Furman O. Ye. Hromadyans’ka vidpovidal’nist’ osobystosti yak predmet psyholohichnoho doslidgennya. O. Ye. Furman. Psyholohiya i suspil’stvo. 2015. №1. S. 65. 91.

Yunh K. G. Problemy dushu nasheho vremeni. Karl Gustav Yung; per. s nem. M.: Progress, 1993. 310 s.

Rotter J.B . Some problems and misconceptions related to the construct of internal versus external control of reinforcement. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1975. №43. Р. 56-67.

Issue

Section

Статті

How to Cite

Lypka, Arsen. “Responsibility of Personality in Coordinates of Psychological Analysis”. Psyhology & Society, no. 1-2, Mar. 2019, pp. 109-17, https://doi.org/10.35774/pis2018.01.109.