Public monitoring of the courts work of Ternopil region

Authors

  • Anatoliy V. Furman Doctor of Psychological Sciences, Professor, Academician of the Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Head of the Department of Psychology and Social Work of the Ternopil National Economic University, Head of the Civil Society Intelligence Headquarters, Head of the Regional Branch of the Sociological Association of Ukraine, Member of the National Union of Journalists of Ukraine, Editor-in-chief of the journal "Psychology and Society", Ternopil
  • Andriy Hirniak Candidate of Psychological Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Psychology and Social Work of the Ternopil National Economic University, Deputy Chairman of the Civil Society Intelligence Headquarters, Deputy Editor-in-Chief of the journal Psychology and Society, Ternopil
  • Halyna Hirniak Candidate of Psychological Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Psychology in the Production Area of the Ivan Puluj National Technical University, Deputy Editor of the Methodological Almanac "Vital Culture Mill", Ternopil

Keywords:

judicial reform, monitoring, social survey, judiciary system, the quality of the court services, quality measurements, evaluation criteria, citizen report card

Abstract

The article contains the results of visitors survey of 20 courts of Ternopil region which was held by public organization “The intellectual headquarter of civil society” from November, 1 2015 to January, 15 2016 based on the methodology of citizen report cards that is an instrument of external quality evaluation of the court. Indicated research was held with the support of USAID project “Fair justice” and gave an opportunity to reveal an integrated assessment of the quality of the courts work of Ternopil region by such six criteria like availability of the court, convenience and comfort of being in the court, completeness and clarity of information, compliance of terms of the judicial consideration, the quality of work of court apparatus staff, the quality of judges work.

References

Hirniak A. N. Krytychnyi analiz yakosti roboty sudiv Ternopilskoi oblasti / A. N. Hirniak, Yu. I. Herheliuk // Ukraina v umovakh reformuvannia pravovoi systemy: suchasni realii ta mizhnarodnyi dosvid : materialy Mizhnar. nauk.-prak. konf., 8-9 kvitnia 2016 r. : tezy dop. – Ternopil : Ekonomichna dumka, 2016. – S. 113-117.

Hirniak A. N. Hromadskist i sudy na shliakhu porozuminnia : [Elektronnyi resurs] / A. N. Hirniak // Ternopil sohodni. – 2016. – 30 bereznia. – Rezhym dostupu do stat. : http://news-te.blogspot.com/2016/03/blog-post_75.html

Hirniak A. N. Otsinka rivnia zadovolenosti hromadian yakistiu funktsionuvannia sudiv Ternopilskoi oblasti: analitychnyi zvit / A. N. Hirniak / Proekt “Spravedlyve pravosuddia”, Hromadska orhanizatsiia “Intelektualnyi shtab hromadianskoho suspilstva”. – Ternopil : TNEU “Ekonomichna dumka”, 2016. – 80 s.

Doslidzhennia yakosti roboty sudiv : posib. dlia vykorystannia metodolohii kartok hromadianskoho zvituvannia / [Devid Von, Maryna Ohai, Yuliia Sedyk, Oleksandr Serdiuk ta in.] ; Proekt USAID “Spravedlyve pravosuddia”. – K. : USAID, 2015. – 125 s.

Rishennia Rady suddiv Ukrainy № 28 vid 02.04.2015 r. [Elektronnyi resurs]. –Rezhym dostupu do stat. : http://court.gov.ua/rsu/rishennya/risksjdfh.

Furman A. V. Metodolohichni oriientyry kompleksnoi humanitarnoi ekspertyzy u pravovii sferi / A. V. Furman // Ukraina v umovakh reformuvannia pravovoi systemy: suchasni realii ta mizhnarodnyi dosvid : materialy Mizhnar. nauk.-prak. konf., 8-9 kvitnia 2016 r. : tezy dop. – Ternopil : Ekonomichna dumka, 2016. – S. 146-148.

Issue

Section

Статті

How to Cite

Furman, Anatoliy V., et al. “Public Monitoring of the Courts Work of Ternopil Region”. Psyhology & Society, no. 3, Mar. 2019, pp. 122-8, https://pis.wunu.edu.ua/index.php/enpis/article/view/932.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>