The mystery of revelation and apocalypse: the content of symbolics

Authors

  • Volodymyr Sabadukha candidate of philosophical sciences, docent, docent of the Philosophy Department of Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas, Ivano-Frankivsk. ukrainian_idea@ukr.net ORCID: 0000-0001-9208-2661 http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9208-2661
  • Oleksii Sabadukha candidate of philosophical sciences, Director of the PO “Ukrainian Association of Psychosomatic Therapy”, Zhytomyr. ukrainian_idea@ukr.net

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35774/pis2021.01.066

Keywords:

Revelation, Apocalypse, the principle of spiritual hierarchy, truth, love, dependent personality, mediocre personality, mature personality, impersonal, metaphysical theory of personality, determination

Abstract

The philosophical, psychological and sociological analysis of the Christian symbol of the Revelation is for the first time in the Ukrainian humanities carried out in the study. Understanding Revelation based on scientific concepts is a very complex problem, however, it is clear that its cause is the lack of the necessary methodology, ignoring the leading trend of world history and spirit i.e. the struggle of impersonal and personal principles of social being. It is proposed to base the study on the concept of four stages of human spiritual development: dependent personality, mediocre personality, mature personality, genius. With the help of Revelation, Christianity rethought the philosophical meaning of the concept of “truth”, which concerned not the material world, but the inner qualities of man. Christianity has come to the conclusion that the question “Who is the truth” is more important to man than the question “What is the truth?” Lack of a philosophical answer to the question “Who is the truth”? led to the dominance of the value judgment “every person is an individual”, which became the philosophical basis of the depersonalized paradigm of human being. Revelation appears as a way out of impersonal being into personal (transcendent), overcoming the fear of personal being, the birth of a spiritual principle in man and as a symbolic beginning of a new – personal – paradigm of being, when the highest values are self-actualization, self-realization and related work. Revelation is not only the birth of a person from an egocentric person, but it is a recognition of the significance of a person in another person. The reasons that prevent the scholars from revealing the meaning of Revelation are analyzed – the mechanisms of psychological protection and fear of personal being. Ignoring the leading trend of the world spirit (the struggle of the impersonal and the personal) and the concept of the four stages of spiritual development of man has led to a decrease in the critical mass of individuals in the human community. Failure to recognize the importance of the idea of personal existence is a crucial ideological cause of the existential vacuum, mental epidemics in the form of hybrid wars, global terrorism and violence against both human nature and nature in general. The modern apocalypse – an anthropological-global catastrophe – is the result of a crisis of impersonal existence and the priority of the material over the spiritual, which is realized by the mediocre person. It is proved that the proposed metaphysical theory of personality meets modern global challenges, opens opportunities for philosophical, psychological and sociological understanding of the causes of the crisis in Ukrainian society and in the human community. It is substantiated that the ideological basis for overcoming the crisis of impersonal existence is the assertion of the priority of the spiritual over the material, the adoption of the ideological law “Personality is the basis of being” and changing the form of determination. Determination of the present must be replaced by determination of the future.

References

Bakhtyn, M.M. (1986). K fylosofyy postupka [To the philosophy of action]. Moscow [in Russion].

Bodryiiar, Zh. (2000). Prozrachnost zla [The transparency of evil]. Moscow [in Russion].

Berdiaev, N.A. (1996). Ystyna y otkrovenye. Prolehomeny k krytyke Otkrovenyia [Truth and revelation. Prolegomena to the criticism of Revelation]. St. Petersburg [in Russion].

Berdiaev, N.A. (1983). O naznachenyy cheloveka [About the appointment of a person]. Moscow [in Russion].

Berdiaev, N.A. (2003). Sudba cheloveka v sovremennom myre [The fate of a person in the modern world]. Kharkov [in Ukrainian].

Berdiaev, N.A. (2007). Fylosofyia neravenstva [Philosophy of inequality]. Moscow [in Russion].

Hartman, N. (2002). Etyka [Ethics]. St. Petersburg [in Russion].

Helvetsii, K.A. (1994). Pro liudynu, yii rozumovi zdibnosti ta yii vykhovannia [About a person, his mental abilities and his upbringing]. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Entsyklika Fides et Ratio Cviatishoho Ottsia Ivana Pavla II do episkopiv Katolytskoi tserkvy pro spivvidnoshennia viry y rozumu (2000). – [Encyclical Fides et Ratio of the Holy Father John Paul II to the Bishops of the Catholic Church on the Relation of Faith and Reason]. Kyiv-Lviv [in Ukrainian].

Ylyn, Y.A. (1993). Put k ochevydnosty [The path to evidence]. Moscow [in Russion].

Lokk, D. (1985). Opyt o chelovecheskom razumenyy [An Experiment on Human Understanding]. Moscow [in Russion].

Makyavelly, N. (1996). Rassuzhdenyia o pervoi dekade Tyta Lyvyia [Discourses on the first decade of Titus Livy]. Moscow [in Russion].

Malaniuk, Y. (2011). Iierarkhiia [Hierarchy]. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Manhaim, K. (2008). Ideolohiia ta utopia [Ideology and utopia]. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Mune, E. (1999). Personalystycheskaia y obshchnostnaia revoliutsyia [Personalistic and communal revolution]. Moscow [in Russion].

Nitsshe, F. (1993). Zhadannia vlady [The desire for power]. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Potustoronnee, kotoroe realno sushchestvuet. Nemistychne potoibichchia. – [The otherworld, which really exists. Non-mystical otherworld]. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Riker, P. (2001). Istoriia ta istyna [History and truth]. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Rius, Zh.(1998). Postup suchasnykh idei: Panorama novitnoi nauky [Progress of modern ideas: Panorama of modern science]. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Sabadukha, V.O. (2014). Hnostytsyzm yak dzherelo kontseptsii chotyrokh rivniv dukhovnoho rozvytku liudyny [Gnosticism as a source of the concept of four levels of human spiritual development]. Ivano-Frankivsk [in Ukrainian].

Sabadukha, V.O. (2011). Hrikhy poserednoi liudyny, abo Filosofskyi analiz prychyn liudskoi destruktyvnosti [Sins of the mediocre man, or Philosophical analysis of the causes of human destructiveness]. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Sabadukha, V.O. (2019). Metafizyka suspilnoho ta osobystisnoho buttia [Metaphysics of social and personal existence]. Ivano-Frankivsk [in Ukrainian].

Sabadukha, V.O. (2012). Ukrainska natsionalna ideia ta kontseptsiia osobystisnoho buttia [Ukrainian national idea and concept of personal existence]. Ivano-Frankivsk [in Ukrainian].

Soloviov, O.V., Sabadukha, V.O. (2014). Chy mozhe pidtverdyty suchasne znannia pro mozok liudyny „fakt zabuttia” elitamy svoikh sotsialnykh zoboviazan [Can modern knowledge of the human brain confirm the fact that the elites have forgotten their social obligations]. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Frank, S.L. (1990). Nepostyzhymoe: ontolohycheskoe vvedenye v fylosofyiu relyhyy [Incomprehensible: an ontological introduction to the philosophy of religion]. Moscow [in Russion].

Frank, S.L. (2003). Realnost y chelovek : metafyzyka chelovecheskoho bytyia [Reality and Man: Metaphysics of Human Being]. Moscow [in Russion].

Frankl, V. (1990). Chelovek v poyskakh smysla [A man in search of meaning]. Moscow [in Russion].

Fromm, E. (2010). Maty chy buty? [To have or to be?]. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A.A. (2017). Psykholohiia smyslozhyttievoho rozvytku osobystosti [Psychology of meaningful life development of personality]. Ternopil [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A.A., Furman, A.V. (2018). Vchynkova buttievist osobystosti: vid kontseptu do metateorii [Actual being of personality: from concept to metatheory]. Ternopil [in Ukrainian]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35774/pis2018.01.005

Furman, A.V. (2012). Natsionalna ideia – shchyt i mech ukrainstva [The national idea is the shield and sword of Ukrainians]. Ternopil [in Ukrainian].

Furman, A.V., Dovhan, A.O. (2019). Onovlena svitohliadna mapa buttia, osmyslenoho v suspilnomu ta osobystisnomu vymirakh [Updated worldview of life, meaningful in social and personal dimensions]. Ternopil [in Ukrainian]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35774/pis2019.03.148

Khaidehher, M. (1993). Vopros o tekhnyke [Question about technique]. Moscow [in Russion].

Iunh, K.H. (2003). Synkhronyia [Synchronicity]. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Jaspers, K. (1994). Smysl y naznachenye ystoryy [The meaning and purpose of history]. Moscow [in Russion].

Issue

Section

Статті

How to Cite

Sabadukha, Volodymyr, and Oleksii Sabadukha. “The Mystery of Revelation and Apocalypse: The Content of Symbolics”. Psyhology & Society, no. 1, July 2021, pp. 66-81, https://doi.org/10.35774/pis2021.01.066.