Peculiarities of the mutually caused development of personality self-consciousness and Self-concept
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35774/pis2018.03.154Keywords:
personality, consciousness, self-consciousness, self-concept, self-esteem, level of aspirations, global Self-concept, positive-harmonic Self-concept, speech as a correlate of consciousness, ability to self-awareness, self-perception, self-creationAbstract
The article highlights peculiarities of the holistic development of self-consciousness, Self-concept and self-esteem as a dialectical complementary of general, special and individual categories in the core of a personality psycho-spiritual life. At the same time, self-consciousness is considered as a holistic psychic new formation, which arises ontogenetically later than consciousness, and the essence of which lies in self-awareness. The dynamic center of consciousness is the Self, which controls the behavior, communication and actions of a human, and the central formation of self-consciousness is the Self-concept that constitutes a system of representations (Self-image), attitudes (Self-attitude), actions (Self-deed) an interconnected set of personality installations that are directed towards himself. It is proved that self-esteem represents a “cell” of self-consciousness, essentially reflects the value and significance that a person attributes to himself. It was made a constructive analysis of the three stages of the self-consciousness development, which was singled out by the German philosopher G. W. F. Hegel: a single, special and general dimension of self-consciousness. It is established that at the personal level, self-consciousness in the structural ratio is a unity of four sides which are caused by a human actions: cognitive (the self-cognition), emotional-valuable (the self-attitude), psycho-regulative (the self-regulation), reflexive (the self-awareness).
References
Bakhtin M.M. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva. M.: Iskusstvo, 1979. 424 s.
Berns R. Razvytye Ya-kontseptsyy i vospytanye. Robert Berns; per. s anhl. M. : Prohress, 1986. 421 s.
Bolotova A.K. Razvitiye samosoznaniya lichnosti: vremennoy aspekt. A.К. Bolotova. Voprosy psikhologii. 2006. №2. S. 116-125.
Vigotskiy L.S. Sobraniye sochineniy: V 6-ti t. T. 1. Voprosy teorii i istorii psikhologii. pod red. A.R. Luriya, M.G. Yaroshevskogo. M.: Pedagogika, 1982. 488 s., il. (Akad. ped. nauk SSSR).
Hehel H.V.F. Entsyklopedyia fylosofskykh nauk. Heorh Vylhelm Frydrykh Hehel. T.3. Fylosofyia dukha. Otv. red. E.P. Sytkovskyi; red. kollehyia: B.M. Kedrov y dr. M.: Mysl, 1977. 471 s. (AN SSSR. Yn-t fylosofyy. Fylos. nasledye).
Dzhems U. Psykholohyia. Uyliam Dzhems: [per. s anhl.; pod red. L.A. Petrovskoi]. M.: Pedahohyka, 1991. 368 s.
Zinchenko V.P. Soznaniye i tvorcheskiy akt. M.: Yazyki slavyanskih kul’tur, 2010. 592 s.: il.
Kant I. Krytyka chystoho rozumu: [per. z nim. ta prym. I. Burkovskoho]. I. Kant. K.: Yunivers, 2000. 504 s.
Kon Y.S. V poyskakh sebia: Lychnost y ee samosoznanye. Ihor Semenovych Kon. M.: Polytyzdat, 1984. 335 s.
Leontev A.N. Deiatelnost. Soznanye. Lychnost. Aleksei Nykolaevych Leontev. M.: Polytyzdat, 1975. 304 s.
Lomov B.F. Ob issledovanii zakonov psykhiki. Borys Fedorovych Lomov. Psykholohycheskyi zhurnal. 1980. T.1, №1. S. 157-189.
Osnovy psykholohiyi : pidruch. [dlya stud. vyshch. navch. zakl.]. za zah. red. O.V. Kyrychuka, V.A. Romentsya. [2-e vyd., stereotyp.]. K. : Lybid, 1996. 632 s.
Petrovskyi V.A. Lychnost v psykholohii : paradihma subyektivnosti. Vadim Arturovych Petrovskyi. Rostov-na-Donu: Fenyks, 1995. 512 s.
Psykholohyia samosoznanyia: khrestomatyia. [red.-sost. D.Ia. Raihorodskyi]. Samara: Izd. Dom “Bakhrar-M”, 2000. 672 s.
Rodzhers K.R. Vzghliad na psykhoterapyiu. Stanovlenye cheloveka. Karl Rodzhers; per. s anhl. [obshch. red. i predysl. Isenynoi E.Y.]. M.: Izd. hruppa “Prohress”, “Unyvers”, 1994. 480 s.
Romenets V.A., Manokha I. P. Istoriya psykholohiyi XX stolittya: navch. posibnyk. V.A. Romenets, I.P. Manokha; vst. st. V.O. Tatenka, T.M. Tytarenko. Vyd. 3-tye. K.: Lybid, 2017. 1056 s.
Rubynshtein S.L. Osnovy obshchei psykholohii : ucheb. [dlia psykholohov, pedahohov, filosofov]. Serhei Leonydovych Rubinshtein. SPb. : Piter, 2000. 712 s. : yl. (Seryia “Mastera psikholohii”).
Freid Z. “Ia” y “Ono”. Zyhmund Freid. “Ia” y “Ono”: v 2-kh kn. Tbylysy: Merany, 1991. Kn. 1. S. 351-392.
Furman A.A. Psykholohiya smyslozhyttyevoho rozvytku osobystosti: [monohrafiya]. Anatoliy Anatoliyovych Furman. Ternopil: TNEU, 2017. 508 s.
Furman A.V., Furman (Humeniuk) O.Ye. Psykholohiia Ya-kontseptsii: Navch. pos. Anatolii Vasylovych Furman, Oksana Yevstakhiivna Furman (Humeniuk). Lviv: Novyi svit-2000, 2006. 360 s
Furman A.V. Svidomist yak ramkova umova piznannya i metodolohuvannya. Anatoliy Furman. Psykholohiya i suspilstvo. 2017. №4. S. 16. 38.
Furman (Humeniuk) O.Ye. Psykholohiia Ya-kontseptsii: navch. pos. O.Ye. Furman (Humeniuk). Ternopil: Ekonomichna dumka, 2004. 310 s.
Furman (Humenyuk) O. Metodolohiya piznannya osvitnoho vchynku v konteksti innovatsiyno-psykholohichnoho klimatu. Oksana Furman (Humenyuk). Psykholohiya i suspilstvo. 2012. №1. S. 47. 81.
Furman O. Yе. Prostir i chas u psykholohichnomu dyskursi. Oksana Yevstakhiivna Furman. Psykholohiya i suspilstvo. 2017. №1. S. 79. 132.
Furman O.Ye. Ya-kontseptsiya yak predmet bahatoaspektnoho teoretyzuvannya. Oksana Yevstakhiivna Furman. Psykholohiya i suspilstvo. 2018. №1-2. S. 38. 67.
Chesnokova Y.Y. Problema samosoznanyia v psykholohii: [monohrafyia]. Iryna Ivanovna Chesnokova. M.: Nauka, 1977. 144 s.
Chamata P.R. K voprosu o genezise samosoznaniya lichnosti /. Problemy soznaniya: Materialy simpoziuma. Mart-aprel 1966. Otv. red. V.M. Banshchikov. M.: Nauka, 1966. S. 228. 239.
Shandruk S. Teoretychna model rozvytku profesiynyh tvorchyh zdibnostey osobystosti praktychnoho psykholoha. Serhiy Shandruk. Psykholohiya i suspilstvo. 2015. №4. S. 107. 121.
Erikson E.H. The concept of ego identity. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn. 1956. №4. Р. 56-121.
Hull, J.G., Slone, L.B., Meteyer, K.B., & Matthews, A.R. (2002). The nonconsciousness of self-consciousness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(2), 406-424.
Trapnell, P.D., & Campbell, J.D. (1999). Private self-consciousness and the five-factor model of personality: Distinguishing rumination from reflection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(2), 284-304.
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
1. PROPOSED POLICY FOR JOURNALS THAT OFFER OPEN ACCESS
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
2. PROPOSED POLICY FOR JOURNALS THAT OFFER DELAYED OPEN ACCESS
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work [SPECIFY PERIOD OF TIME] after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
